User talk:Pocar19
October 2012
[edit]
Hello, I'm Eeekster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Laboratory Unit Operations, but you didn't provide a reliable source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 18:07, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Laboratory Unit Operations, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.labautopedia.org/mw/index.php/Laboratory_Unit_Operation_%28LUO%29_concept.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 18:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
The article Laboratory Unit Operations has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Completely unreferenced, apparently pure WP:OR.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Balph Eubank ✉ 18:08, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Laboratory Unit Operations
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Laboratory Unit Operations requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. - Balph Eubank ✉ 18:09, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
A page you started has been reviewed!
[edit]Thanks for creating Automated pipetting system, Pocar19!
Wikipedia editor Danielj27052705 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
Very well written and Interesting article- only categories needed
To reply, leave a comment on Danielj27052705's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Ways to improve Pipette stand
[edit]Hello, Pocar19,
Thanks for creating Pipette stand! I edit here too, under the username Meatsgains and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Meatsgains(talk) 01:11, 11 April 2019 (UTC)
Domino block moved to draftspace
[edit]An article you recently created, Domino block, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 15:35, 13 April 2019 (UTC)
The article Domino (laboratory) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Proprietary term used by one single manufacturer; no general use in industry, no independent sourcing.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Elmidae (talk · contribs) 23:56, 20 July 2019 (UTC)
Draft:Domino block concern
[edit]Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Domino block, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:25, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Domino block
[edit]
Hello, Pocar19. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Domino block".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Alliance (October 29)
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, Pocar19!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — SamX [talk · contribs] 21:19, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Alliance (November 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
- Hi Ratnahastin, can you help me how to modify the article to avoid looking like an advertisement, please? I tried to follow an article of a similar company (Eppendorf) and I tried to be as neutral as possible. Your guidance will be very appreciated. Thanks Pocar19 (talk) 13:41, 1 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Andrew Alliance (November 2)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Andrew Alliance and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Pocar19. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Draft:Andrew Alliance, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Your edits to Liquid handling robot also, and Automated pipetting system, make it clear enough that you have a conflict of interest with this Andrew company. Please declare that properly before you do anything else. Drmies (talk) 17:15, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Automated pipetting system
[edit] Hello, Pocar19. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Automated pipetting system, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Andrew Alliance
[edit] Hello, Pocar19. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Andrew Alliance, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC)