User talk:Pncpa
June 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ϫ 20:46, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not add promotional material to articles or other Wikipedia pages, as you did to Wikipedia:Layout. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" is strongly discouraged. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 19:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
you seem to have reedited the first part of this guideline as if its an article on a business. I suggest you revert this. if this was somehow an accident, you need explain it on that pages talk page. This is not an appropriate edit for this page.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 19:40, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of "Postlethwaite & Netterville"
[edit]
A page you created, Postlethwaite & Netterville, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for companies in particular.
You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.
Thank you. Alansohn (talk) 20:53, 14 July 2009 (UTC)
The article for Postlethwaite & Netterville is largely written as an advertising piece, and not as a neutral and objective article per the WP:NPOV standard. There are also no sources, per WP:RS and WP:V that demonstrate that the company meets the Wikipedia standard for notability. I have no doubt that the company exists, but the question of why the company should have an article needs to be answered. Given your choice of user name, you may also want to review policy regarding conflict of interest. Alansohn (talk) 23:46, 14 July 2009 (UTC)