User talk:Pliroforia

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Pliroforia! This is your Talk page, where other Wikipedia users might drop you a message from time to time related to any edits you make. You'll notice that I have dropped a 'badge' below this message, which shows that you are involved in the Conway project. If you want to, you can copy and paste the 'badge' onto your user page (a page you can create when you click on your username at the top level menu). Thanks for taking this first step! If you want reply here, you can type in {{U|KerstingFan}} to your message which will give me a notification. Thank you! KerstingFan (talk) 09:49, 19 August 2020 (UTC) Projects[reply]

This user is a participant in WikiProject Conway Library

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Anthony Newton (September 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Utopes was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The article is heavily biased due to the use of peacock words throughout the entire body of the page. Examples include, but are not limited to, "Newton employed...in its own right." and "His expertise in identifying...the Minster's nave clerestory." There are a couple more examples but those two are enough for me to decline this.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Peter Anthony Newton and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Peter Anthony Newton, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pliroforia! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:21, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Peter Anthony Newton

Hello, Pliroforia. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Peter Anthony Newton, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:02, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Anthony Newton has been accepted

Peter Anthony Newton, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 03:18, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]