User talk:Pleaseandthankyou1

Pleaseandthankyou1, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Pleaseandthankyou1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:01, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

May 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at George Stephanopoulos, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article.

1) The Washington Examiner is NOT a reliable source. 2) Using primary sources WITHOUT secondary coverage is not on. Doing this to add defamatory information a biography of a living person WP:BLP is NOT going to be allowed. If you want this included, come up with reliable sources and get consensus on the talk page of the article that it's worth including. Calton | Talk 10:11, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It may not have been your intention, but one of your edits, specifically one that you made on George Stephanopoulos, may have been a change that some consider controversial. Due to this, your edits may have been reverted. When making possibly controversial changes, it is good practice to first discuss your edit on the article's talk page before making it, to gain consensus over whether or not to include the text, phrasing, etc. If you believe that the information you added was correct, please initiate that discussion.

Enough. Throwing buckets of mud and hoping some of it sticks is NOT a valid approach to writing a biography of a living person, ESPECIALLY when relying on passing references and sources that DON'T support the wording, even if using ostensibly reliable sources. At the very BEST, due weight guidelines apply, so go to the article talk page and get consensus if you want to continue this campaign.' Calton | Talk 09:48, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of sockpuppetry, which means that someone suspects you of using multiple Wikipedia accounts for prohibited purposes. Please make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Therazzors. Thank you. Calton | Talk 10:15, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Therazzors per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Therazzors. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]