User talk:PleasePlayMyColony9395

March 2022

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gaultheria humifusa have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gaultheria humifusa was changed by PleasePlayMyColony9395 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.964257 on 2022-03-10T00:27:36+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 00:27, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making test edits to Wikipedia pages, such as the one you made with this edit to Committee on International Security and Arms Control, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Bgv. (talk) 00:30, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. -Alabama- (talk) 00:34, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Alexf^(talk) 00:35, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleasePlayMyColony9395 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I request an unblock. Please. I need to start a new arbcom case. I will not vandalise anymore. It was unnecessary, and I also understand what I got blocked for. I admit my block, and I should be trusted again because I want to be automatically confirmed. Take a look at this edit. It was unintentional editing. --PleasePlayMyColony9395 (talk) 00:37, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I don't know why you summoned me here, but in examining your edits I think that the block is completely correct. If you have constructive edits to make, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@331dot: I need to consult with you to unblock me, please. Alexf blocked me for inappropriate edits. --PleasePlayMyColony9395 (talk) 00:52, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot: I have no constructive edits, sorry. PleasePlayMyColony9395 (talk) 01:17, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you have no edits to make, there is no need to unblock you, as blocks only prevent editing. 331dot (talk) 01:38, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

2nd unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleasePlayMyColony9395 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I already made an unblock request and an appeal but they both declined it! Please unblock me! --PleasePlayMyColony9395 (talk) 03:54, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

We don't unblock people just because they desperately beg to be ... — Daniel Case (talk) 07:47, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Alexf: I already mentioned you on my Simple English Wikipedia talk page. This is regerding you and Vermont. Please refer to this at simple:User talk:PleasePlayMyColony9395#Shelter wiki. Thank you. PleasePlayMyColony9395 (talk) 04:56, 10 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Breast999A per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Breast999A. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:52, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]