User talk:Play Money for Dummies

Stop removing content

Please stop removing content on Bitcoin. Just because you don't believe in the project does not make Bitcoin non-notable. You are risking being blocked, and you're not helping Wikipedia. Why don't you try editing constructively instead? • Jesse V.^(talk) 00:00, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Primary sources

Hello Play Money. Regarding your edit, where you removed a link to a Bitcoin whitepaper as a source. A primary source is fine to establish that the person said this. See WP:PSTS. We often link to primary sources to establish what an organization or group does, with the understanding that this only presents their view. I take note that your user name might be considered to be an ironic comment on Bitcoin. If you are editing as a WP:Single purpose account please use caution, because your account name may be seen as a red flag by administrators. Thanks, EdJohnston (talk) 18:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Play Money for Dummies, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Play Money for Dummies! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Benzband (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of HowardStrong (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Dennis Brown - 2¢ © Join WER 23:43, 26 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]