User talk:Plavalagunanbanshee
Đâhow many people died
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Aphenphosmphobia, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at its talk page. Removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, but the article may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. -- lucasbfr talk 21:07, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:GregPlitt-IconMag.JPG)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:GregPlitt-IconMag.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:09, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
){kind=link}
The article Greg Plitt has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- There is no evidence that he satisfies the notability guidelines. The references and external links are: a page on an advertising web site; an article making brief mention of Plitt in a few sentences; a YouTube video marked "this video is private", and unavailable for public viewing; IMDb; three dead links; a web page listing a few links, one of which is "Greg Plitt", but clicking on that link just opens a search page, and gives no information about him, in effect another dead link. Google search produces mostly much more of the same sort of things.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:41, 9 December 2012 (UTC)