User talk:Platznium1

Nomination of Juris Graubergers for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juris Graubergers is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juris Graubergers until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

CUPIDICAE💕 20:28, 20 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:D3FAULTX8 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/D3FAULTX8. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. --Blablubbs (talk) 17:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

False sockpuppet bans

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Platznium1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Clearly false sockpuppet ban. I'm not connected with the user called "D3DAULTX". This is completely a false sockpuppet ban. Please provide a valid research report on why do you think I was affiliated with the user. Also, I invited the user zapfrommars and Not chicken to contribute to the discussion. I believe anyone accessing Wikipedia can literally contribute to open discussions either way. Please stop banning them and my account for the reason of sockpuppeting by another user. Platznium1 (talk) 02:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 03:03, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.