User talk:Plasmastar
Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. I cannot see any reason why information about a private server is helpful or informative in an encyclopedia meant to inform a general audience. Nor can I see any reasonable way that this information can be attributed to a reliable source. If you are aware of a Wikipedia guideline that would support adding this detail to the article, I hope you'll bring it to my attention. If not, please stop adding it. -FisherQueen (Talk) 10:25, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
Ok ok, I have been informed that I should keep that information to myself. But it would have been useful to post it here for people that didn't know about it if I hadn't been told to keep my mouth shut. Like I said, sometimes Cascade does make exceptions and lets decent people onto his "Private Server". And whoever said it wasn't a reliable source? Seems like you just don't know anything about it. You madam, have just been owned. :P -Plasmastar
On the address I removed
[edit]I hope I didn't misinterpret your recent edit. If the server address is "just a rumor," then we shouldn't add it to the article until it is confirmed- Wikipedia isn't in the business of publishing rumors, only information that comes from reliable sources. -FisherQueen (Talk) 00:39, 9 April 2007 (UTC)
Some of the oldbies say it's true but I don't personally know. It's also been said that the server isn't up much so it can't really be proven. -Plasmastar