User talk:Pizzaman6233

Welcome!

Hello, Pizzaman6233, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! --Midnightcomm 04:43, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woah!

With regards to your comments on Capella University: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. —Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:49, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why can he/she tell me what I can and can't post? What gives him/her the right?

Why can Shac1 post articles from copywrited sources and I can't?

That is not the point of this message. You should never attack another editor because you are in a dispute with him/her. Please discuss your changes on Talk:Capella University.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 04:58, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to ask this person why his facts are relavant but mine are not. He continues to post articles that only he agrees with. I add stuff and he removes it saying it is vandalism but when he does it it is ok. WHat gives?

You cannot curse at others nor tell them to get a life. That's what gives.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:10, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Additionally: Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly, as you are doing in Capella University. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. Rather than reverting, discuss disputed changes on the talk page. The revision you want is not going to be implemented by edit warring. Thank you.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:11, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

So what you are telling me is I can get blocked for putting something up and reputting it up because someone else erases it?

Yes, but the other person can also be blocked for doing the same.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:17, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Shac1 wants to post links to articles that shed only bad light on Capella. I post articles that shed good light. Why is his data more important than mine?

It does not matter whose stuff is more important than the other, it is the disruption this is causing.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:27, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do I stop the disruption? What do I do to make a point that I am posting relevant information to the facts surrounding Capella University? I will keep posting and he keeps erasing? Nobody wins.

Go to the talk page. Discuss it there.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:31, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Where is the talk page ````

Talk:Capella University—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 05:56, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Any more personal attacks such as creating another user's page (Shac1) as an attack page and you will be blocked. This is not a message board. Flame wars are strongly discouraged. --Woohookitty^Woohoo! 08:45, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]