User talk:Pistooo

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Pistooo, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Help desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date. We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains^(talk) 00:54, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Romaisa Khan moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Romaisa Khan, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia, especially on Biographies of living persons). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Styyx^{Talk? ^-^} 17:55, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Raza Samo

Hello, Pistooo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username Nightenbelle, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Raza Samo, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raza Samo .

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Nightenbelle}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Nightenbelle (talk) 18:34, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mixxtone (DJ)

The article Mixxtone (DJ) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Cannot find references to assert notability (and all currently listed references are primary). Also appears to be a copy-paste from the relevant draft, so work can continue there.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Giraffer ^{(talk·contribs)} 17:52, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mixxtone for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mixxtone is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mixxtone until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 20:20, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Saqlainify per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Saqlainify. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 21:12, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]