User talk:Pipo489
A tag has been placed on E3value, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Drivenapart (talk) 14:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Answer
[edit]It is not an ad or anything like that ! E3Value is a serious graphical modeling language for business approach. The tool to use it and all the documentation are free of use.
AfD nomination of E3value
[edit]I have nominated E3value, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E3value. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Drivenapart (talk) 15:46, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Explanation
[edit]Hello, I agree that I'm a beginner in Wikipedia rules: the first version of my article was not neutral, as if I have nothing to do with e3value, it is just a subject of study for one of my courses. I've rewrited this article and now I really think it is neutral and clear, in the Wikipedia syntax. E3value is becoming more and more important in business modeling, it is not part of any companies, and the tool to develop it is free to use. I really think it has a place in Wikipedia. Please explain why you consider not before deleting it.
Regards
Recreation of deleted page
[edit]Please do not recreate pages that were deleted after an AfD discussion, like you did with E3value. You can take it to deletion review if you dispute the conclusion of the debate. Fram (talk) 09:08, 21 May 2008 (UTC)´
Welcome!
[edit]
|
