User talk:Pigslookfunny

Adoption offer

I see you're looking for adoption by a more experienced user. I've been around on Wikipedia for more than a year now, and I have a pretty good idea of how it works. Let me know on my talk page if you're still interested in adoption. Happy editing! —P^urple ^RA^IN 14:36, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kent‎ FAC

Hi. I'm sorry to bother you, but as a Wikiproject Grammar member, I just wondered if you would be willing to have a look through the Kent‎ article. It is currently a Featured Article Candidate and needs a copy-edit for grammar by someone who hasn't yet seen it. Any other ways to improve the article would also be welcome. Thank you very much, if you can. Epbr123 10:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hi. I realize I haven't done much in the way of adoption -- I figured that you'd come to me if you had questions. Sorry if that didn't work out for you. Anyway, I'm likely to be less involved at Wikipedia, so I'm stepping back from the adoption thing for a while. If you still feel like you need adoption, head back to Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User, where there are several willing adopters who'll be able to help you. Thanks. —P^urple ^RA^IN 15:46, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

League of Copyeditors roll call

Greetings from the League of Copyeditors. Your name is listed on our members page, but we are unsure how many of the people listed there are still active contributors to the League's activities. If you are still interested in participating in the work of the League, please follow the instructions at the members page to add your name to the active members list. Once you have done that, you might want to familiarise yourself with the new requests system, which has replaced the old /proofreading subpage. As the old system is now deprecated, the main efforts of the League should be to clear the substantial backlog which still exists there.
The League's services are in as high demand as ever, as evinced by the increasing backlog on our requests pages, both old and new. While FA and GA reviewers regularly praise the League's contributions to reviewed articles, we remain perennially understaffed. Fulfilling requests to polish the prose of Wikipedia's highest-profile articles is a way that editors can make a very noticeable difference to the appearance of the encyclopedia. On behalf of the League, if you do consider yourself to have left, I hope you will consider rejoining; if you consider yourself inactive, I hope you will consider returning to respond to just one request per week, or as many as you can manage. Merry Christmas and happy editing, The League of Copyeditors.

Melon‑Bot (STOP!) 18:04, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]