User talk:Pigi100Triste

This is Pigi100Triste's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Republic of Triste (November 3)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pigi100Triste! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi KylieTastic, your respond didn't address any of my reasons for why the article shouldn't be removed. For this reason, I ask you to bring the page back. I can make it clearer that this nation is a micronation that doesn't officially exist, but there is no reason that the page shouldn't exist.

Thank you in advance. Pigi100Triste (talk) 16:21, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). KylieTastic (talk) 16:23, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

While you are correct that the micronation isn't yet famous, it is significant and is mentioned in at least 2 youtube videos and even more linked forms. The creation of the country is new, which is why it hasn't received much attention. The videos have already received thousands of view. 2A00:A041:3A99:BB00:201F:2144:479E:F933 (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it had millions of views that would not make it notable. KylieTastic (talk) 16:36, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Then what would make it notable? Pigi100Triste (talk) 16:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

See fist answer above - significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources KylieTastic (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying. If we manage to have at least 2 independent reliable sources we'll you let the page exist? Pigi100Triste (talk) 17:01, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Normally the rule of thumb is 3+ but it really depends on the source and how much coverage. However, as people make up new micronations on an almost daily basis I doubt that any serious source is going to care about yet another one created by a small YouTube channel KylieTastic (talk) 17:10, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I understand. Thank you for spending your time with this

(It's pigi100 just I am not logged in in my phone where I am answering) 2A01:73C0:603:414F:F855:E0FF:FE09:A0A2 (talk) 17:13, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Republic of Triste

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Republic of Triste, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 15:19, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]