User talk:Pierce blalock/sandbox

Nathan's Revisions

Title is appropriate
The first sentence is very informative
The lead is a great, well rounded summary of the article
Seems to be written in your own words, the first publisher of the article who wrote the 2010 census section may have copied a bit so you could reword that section
all of the data is easily understandable and in a readable format
Written in an unbiased manner
Does not use first or second person :)
Follows the wikipedia format very closely
The in-text citations seem to be very good but it may draw to much from the 2010 census alone and that section could be cut down a little
The article could use more links in the tourism and history sections but besides that, they are used well

Longnat (talk) 23:23, 22 October 2019 (UTC) Longnat (talk) 19:03, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dylan Jiao's peer revision

First thing first, you got to add a title. Second, I can't really peer edit much since you didn't revise the article much. I noticed that you changed the order of the history and geography segments which I believe is a nice change to the article since it makes sense to talk about history first.