User talk:Pickelhaube103
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/37/Nice_Cup_of_Tea.jpg/220px-Nice_Cup_of_Tea.jpg)
Hello, Pickelhaube103, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Below are some pages that you might find helpful. For a user-friendly interactive help forum see the Wikipedia Teahouse.
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia or the Tutorial
- Create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified style guide
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. Again, If you need help visit the Teahouse or you can to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Sm8900 (talk) 04:04, 10 May 2020 (UTC)
July 2020
[edit] Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to National Reorganization Process—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:08, 2 July 2020 (UTC)
Edit summaries, please
[edit] Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Eric talk 13:06, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Edit summaries
[edit]Please use clearer edit summaries when you are editing. Here you summarize your edit as whitewashing, but I don't know what you wanted to whitewash. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 07:42, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
I Think it’s pretty clear that i was saying that you were whitewashing. Pickelhaube103 (talk) 07:47, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
- Then see Wikipedia:No personal attacks for policy. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 14:10, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- Accusing someone of whitewashing isn’t a personal attack. Pickelhaube103 (talk) 15:02, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- But it is according to previous WP:AE decisions. Zloyvolsheb (talk) 17:15, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- You just throw something against the Wall until it sticks don’t you? Anyway i don’t know much about WP:AE, but accusing someone of whitewashing is quite common on wikipedia. Pickelhaube103 (talk) 18:19, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
Notification of discretionary sanctions
[edit]This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in Eastern Europe or the Balkans. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Zloyvolsheb (talk) 17:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
- You have to be joking. Pickelhaube103 (talk) 18:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Politics -- K1ausMouse
[edit]How can someone be a Posadist and a Primitist at the same time? XD