User talk:Pichpich/Archive-2018

Archives

Talk page threads of 2008-2009
Talk page threads of 2010
Talk page threads of 2011
Talk page threads of 2012
Talk page threads of 2013
Talk page threads of 2014
Talk page threads of 2015
Talk page threads of 2016
Talk page threads of 2017
Talk page threads of 2018
Talk page threads of 2019
Talk page threads of 2020
Talk page threads of 2021
Talk page threads of 2022
Talk page threads of 2023

metal-archives.com is not a reliable srouce

https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Cut_Up&diff=818819745&oldid=818818506 Please don't even add it as an external link. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

?

Why did you unreview 2017 6 Hours of Bahrain?--Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Because I messed up... Note that I re-reviewed it seconds later. Sorry, Pichpich (talk) 20:38, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I didn't see that you re-reviewed it. It's fine, I wasn't mad, just wondered what your reason was.--Seacactus 13 (talk) 20:42, 6 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Liberalist

Why was Liberalist reverted? My addition before it was reverted was a 'not to be confused with' link. I do think that the Liberalist movement is important enough to need its own page, do you disagree or do you think it simply needed to be a more comprehensive article before we removed the reversion to liberalism?--ChekhovsGnu(talk)11:09, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I firmly believe that readers searching for "liberalist" are more likely to be interested in the article on liberalism than in the fairly fringe views of Benjamin. Pichpich (talk) 07:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"A Night in Malnéant" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect "A Night in Malnéant". Since you had some involvement with the "A Night in Malnéant" redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. — PinkAmpers &^{(Je vous invite à me parler)} 22:05, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Primefac. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Canadians for Health Research, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Primefac (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to both, can you please help. I am trying to write the page Canadians for Health Research without having massive pieces deleted after each review. How can I demonstrate that I have copyright permission? Also, the last edit I made contained a table and I am unsure why was it deleted. Many thanks (I think that is the link to my talk page talk) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Greatbanane (talk • contribs) 06:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Kanutia

Hello Pichpich. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Kanutia, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Contains sufficient content to be a stub. Thank you. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 01:19, 16 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

fleet

Why did you delete the fleet page bring it back you cant just do that i will report you if you dont Mississauga transit fan (talk) 02:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. The article's deletion was actually decided by a debate I did not participate in. See Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Toronto Transit Commission bus fleet. Cheers, Pichpich (talk) 04:32, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tullinge TP FK

Hello, I just wanted to advise you that I have contested your proposed deletion of Tullinge TP FK, I have now done a little work on the article to add references and give a little more context that I believe now asserts notability. The team have appeared in the 2017-18 Svenska Cupen, i.e. the national cup competition of Swedish football, and as per WP:FOOTYN clubs meeting this criteria are generally assumed to be notable by the standards of WikiProject Football. Yes, that is an essay rather than a policy, but it is a generally agreed standard that has been supported by project members in previous deletion discussions. Jellyman (talk) 08:45, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your efforts in reviewing new pages!

Backlog update:

The new page backlog is currently at 3819 unreviewed articles, with a further 6660 unreviewed redirects.
We are very close to eliminating the backlog completely; please help by reviewing a few extra articles each day!

New Year Backlog Drive results:

We made massive progress during the recent four weeks of the NPP Backlog Drive, during which the backlog reduced by nearly six thousand articles and the length of the backlog by almost 3 months!

General project update:

ACTRIAL will end it's initial phase on the 14th of March. Our goal is to reduce the backlog significantly below the 90 day index point by the 14th of March. Please consider helping with this goal by reviewing a few additional pages a day.
Reviewing redirects is an important and necessary part of New Page Patrol. Please read the guideline on appropriate redirects for advice on reviewing redirects. Inappropriate redirects can be re-targeted or nominated for deletion at RfD.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. 20:32, 7 February 2018 (UTC)

NPP Backlog Drive Review

Hi. looking over some your reviews from the recent backlog drive I saw that you did great work! One thing I would mention is that your use of maintenance tags seemed at bit sporadic. For example, from the dozen or so re-reviews I did; IndieWire Critics Poll, Monty Python's Flying Circus: Just the Words, and Rintaro_Tokunaga should have had some tags added (which I have now done). Nothing serious, as all are notable topics based on searches, just a bit of feedback. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 500 reviews during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol! There is still work to do to meet our long term goals, so I hope you will continue your great work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

		Asymmetric Epicyclic Gears
		For maintaining a streak of at least 100 reviews per week during the 2018 NPP New Year Backlog drive, you are awarded the asymmetric epicyclic gears. Well done! Keep up the good work. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 02:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New Page Review Newsletter No.10

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

ACTRIAL's six month experiment restricting new page creation to (auto)confirmed users ended on 14 March. As expected, a greatly increased number of unsuitable articles and candidates for deletion are showing up in the feed again, and the backlog has since increased already by ~30%. Please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day.

Paid editing

Now that ACTRIAL is inoperative pending discussion, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies. A further discussion is currently taking place at: Can a subject specific guideline invalidate the General Notability Guideline?

Nominate competent users for Autopatrolled

While patrolling articles, if you find an editor that is particularly competent at creating quality new articles, and that user has created more than 25 articles (rather than stubs), consider nominating them for the 'Autopatrolled' user right HERE.

News

The next issue Wikipedia's newspaper The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it, including ACTRIAL wrap-up that will be of special interest to New Page Reviewers. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. The Signpost is one of the best ways to stay up date with news and new developments - please consider subscribing to it. All editors of Wikipedia and associated projects are welcome to submit articles on any topic for consideration by the The Signpost's editorial team for the next issue.

To opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 08:06, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hoo Cha-pen

Hi, what's wrong with the reference in the page? GBG (msg) 23:15, 13 apr 2018 (CEST) — Preceding unsigned comment added by GBG (talk • contribs)

NPR Bronze Award

		The New Page Reviewer's Bronze Award
		For over 1000 new page reviews in the last year, thank you very much for your help at New Pages Patrol! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:05, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Matthew hk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Ganges river dolphin, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Matthew_hk t c 02:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.11 25 May 2018

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

ACTRIAL:

WP:ACREQ has been implemented. The flow at the feed has dropped back to the levels during the trial. However, the backlog is on the rise again so please consider reviewing a few extra articles each day; a backlog approaching 5,000 is still far too high. An effort is also needed to ensure that older unsuitable older pages at the back of the queue do not get automatically indexed for Google.

Deletion tags

Do bear in mind that articles in the feed showing the trash can icon may have been tagged by inexperienced or non NPR rights holders. They require your further verification.

Backlog drive:

A backlog drive will take place from 10 through 20 June. Check out our talk page at WT:NPR for more details. NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.

Editathons

There will be a large increase in the number of editathons in June. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

Paid editing - new policy

Now that ACTRIAL is ACREQ, please be sure to look for tell-tale signs of undisclosed paid editing. Contact the creator if appropriate, and submit the issue to WP:COIN if necessary. There is a new global WMF policy that requires paid editors to connect to their adverts.

Subject-specific notability guidelines

The box at the right contains each of the subject-specific notability guidelines, please review any that are relevant BEFORE nominating an article for deletion.
Reviewers are requested to familiarise themselves with the new version of the notability guidelines for organisations and companies.

Not English

A common issue: Pages not in English or poor, unattributed machine translations should not reside in main space even if they are stubs. Please ensure you are familiar with WP:NPPNE. Check in Google for the language and content, tag as required, then move to draft if they do have potential.

News

Development is underway by the WMF on upgrades to the New Pages Feed, in particular ORES features that will help to identify COPYVIOs, and more granular options for selecting articles to review.
The next issue of The Signpost has been published. The newspaper is one of the best ways to stay up to date with news and new developments. between our newsletters.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexandra Daddario Fan: Can you change my page from Draft:Kingsgate Films to Kingsgate Films

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: . Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: , , , .
Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Charles I. Ecker for deletion

As a previous editor to the entry, I'm giving you a heads up that a discussion is taking place as to whether the article Charles I. Ecker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Charles I. Ecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.Bangabandhu (talk) 16:41, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Ernaga info

Hi Pichpich. Please check at Baseball Almanac pages [1] / [2]. Thanks for your attention. MusiCitizen (talk) 03:21, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Just what I needed. Thanks! Pichpich (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Brief Cases

Greetings.

I just got a notice that you reviewed Brief Cases, a redirect I made. May I ask what such an action means, and how does it affect page/redirects?

Thanks! OneShot010 (talk) 22:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @OneShot010:. Technically all new pages that are created by users without the autopatrolled permission are reviewed by someone with the Reviewer permission. The point is to ensure that newly created articles and redirects are basically ok and to clean up or submit for deletion those which are not. So there you go, I hereby declare that your redirect made perfect sense. :-) Pichpich (talk) 22:09, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for explaining! OneShot010 (talk) 02:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yamato-kotoba

I reverted you, but didn't want to communicate in an edit summary, so messaging you here.

It was not a content fork, and you should read articles before redirecting them (wago is not a synonym for waka (poetry), and is used in entirely different contexts to refer to a slightly different category of words). The article as I left it was really short, so you didn't have much of an excuse for not reading it; in fact, I suspect you probably only redirected it because it was so short. That was my bad, and I apologize; I was distracted before I could expand it. If you want to expand it yourself, fire ahead; if you can't expand the content but want to fix the formatting issues by adding cats, etc., fire ahead.

Anyway, the article before I created the "content fork" was actually located at yamato kotoba, and I moved it specifically to make room for the new article; blanking the new article and redirecting it to the old one under the new title doesn't make sense, unless you actually agree with my page move but not the motivation behind the page move, which would be really weird.

Hijiri 88 (聖やや) 05:19, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Bplus-Class Chemistry articles

A tag has been placed on Category:Bplus-Class Chemistry articles requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Reason: Perpetually empty. B+ is not used by this wikiproject (or any wikiproject other than WP:WPMATH); see WP:WikiProject Chemistry/Assessment and Template:WikiProject Chemistry/doc#Parameters; attempting to assess a chemistry article as B+ will fail, so this category can never populate. — SMcCandlish ☏ ¢ 😼 16:07, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

		Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
		For completing over 250 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping out at New Page Patrol and keep up the good work, Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 01:45, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Arthur R.G. Solmssen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bryn Mawr (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Tom McMahon (American football coach), Pichpich.

Unfortunately Domdeparis has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

sorry but this guy fails WP:NGRIDIRON #3 as he is not head coach and WP:GNG

To reply, leave a comment on Domdeparis's talk page.

Dom from Paris (talk) 15:00, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.12 30 July 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months. (Purge)

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

June backlog drive

Overall the June backlog drive was a success, reducing the last 3,000 or so to below 500. However, as expected, 90% of the patrolling was done by less than 10% of reviewers.
Since the drive closed, the backlog has begun to rise sharply again and is back up to nearly 1,400 already. Please help reduce this total and keep it from raising further by reviewing some articles each day.

New technology, new rules

New features are shortly going to be added to the Special:NewPagesFeed which include a list of drafts for review, OTRS flags for COPYVIO, and more granular filter preferences. More details can be found at this page.
Probationary permissions: Now that PERM has been configured to allow expiry dates to all minor user rights, new NPR flag holders may sometimes be limited in the first instance to 6 months during which their work will be assessed for both quality and quantity of their reviews. This will allow admins to accord the right in borderline cases rather than make a flat out rejection.
Current reviewers who have had the flag for longer than 6 months but have not used the permissions since they were granted will have the flag removed, but may still request to have it granted again in the future, subject to the same probationary period, if they wish to become an active reviewer.

Editathons

Editathons will continue through August. Please be gentle with new pages that obviously come from good faith participants, especially articles from developing economies and ones about female subjects. Consider using the 'move to draft' tool rather than bluntly tagging articles that may have potential but which cannot yet reside in mainspace.

The Signpost

The next issue of the monthly magazine will be out soon. The newspaper is an excellent way to stay up to date with news and new developments between our newsletters. If you have special messages to be published, or if you would like to submit an article (one about NPR perhaps?), don't hesitate to contact the editorial team here.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 00:00, 30 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hopeless Romantic

There should be no links to disambiguation pages, so now that you made Hopeless Romantic a dab page, would you please follow up and fix all the incoming links? (DisamAssist, Dabfix and Dabsolver are helpful.) Thanks. — Gorthian (talk) 05:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.13 18 September 2018

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

The New Page Feed currently has 2700 unreviewed articles, up from just 500 at the start of July. For a while we were falling behind by an average of about 40 articles per day, but we have stabilised more recently. Please review some articles from the back of the queue if you can (Sort by: 'Oldest' at Special:NewPagesFeed), as we are very close to having articles older than one month.

Project news

The New Page Feed now has a new "Articles for Creation" option which will show drafts instead of articles in the feed, this shouldn't impact NPP activities and is part of the WMF's AfC Improvement Project.

As part of this project, the feed will have some larger updates to functionality next month. Specifically, ORES predictions will be built in, which will automatically flag articles for potential issues such as vandalism or spam. Copyright violation detection will also be added to the new page feed. See the projects's talk page for more info.

There are a number of coordination tasks for New Page Patrol that could use some help from experienced reviewers. See Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Coordination#Coordinator tasks for more info to see if you can help out.

Other

A new summary page of reliable sources has been created; Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources/Perennial sources, which summarizes existing RfCs or RSN discussions about regularly used sources.

Moving to Draft and Page Mover

Some unsuitable new articles can be best reviewed by moving them to the draft space, but reviewers need to do this carefully and sparingly. It is most useful for topics that look like they might have promise, but where the article as written would be unlikely to survive AfD. If the article can be easily fixed, or if the only issue is a lack of sourcing that is easily accessible, tagging or adding sources yourself is preferable. If sources do not appear to be available and the topic does not appear to be notable, tagging for deletion is preferable (PROD/AfD/CSD as appropriate). See additional guidance at WP:DRAFTIFY.
If the user moves the draft back to mainspace, or recreates it in mainspace, please do not re-draftify the article (although swapping it to maintain the page history may be advisable in the case of copy-paste moves). AfC is optional except for editors with a clear conflict of interest.
Articles that have been created in contravention of our paid-editing-requirements or written from a blatant NPOV perspective, or by authors with a clear COI might also be draftified at discretion.
The best tool for draftification is User:Evad37/MoveToDraft.js^(info). Kindly adapt the text in the dialogue-pop-up as necessary (the default can also be changed like this). Note that if you do not have the Page Mover userright, the redirect from main will be automatically tagged as CSD R2, but in some cases it might be better to make this a redirect to a different page instead.
The Page Mover userright can be useful for New Page Reviewers; occasionally page swapping is needed during NPR activities, and it helps avoid excessive R2 nominations which must be processed by admins. Note that the Page Mover userright has higher requirements than the NPR userright, and is generally given to users active at Requested Moves. Only reviewers who are very experienced and are also very active reviewers are likely to be granted it solely for NPP activities.

List of other useful scripts for New Page Reviewing

Twinkle provides a lot of the same functionality as the page curation tools, and some reviewers prefer to use the Twinkle tools for some/all tasks. It can be activated simply in the gadgets section of 'preferences'. There are also a lot of options available at the Twinkle preferences panel after you install the gadget.
In terms of other gadgets for NPR, HotCat is worth turning on. It allows you to easily add, remove, and change categories on a page, with name suggestions.
MoreMenu also adds a bunch of very useful links for diagnosing and fixing page issues.
User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js^(info): Installing scripts doesn't have to be complicated. Go to your common.js and copy importScript( 'User:Equazcion/ScriptInstaller.js' ); into an empty line, now you can install all other scripts with the click of a button from the script page! (Note you need to be at the ".js" page for the script for the install button to appear, not the information page)
User:TheJosh/Scripts/NewPagePatrol.js^(info): Creates a scrolling new pages list at the left side of the page. You can change the number of pages shown by adding the following to the next line on your common.js page (immediately after the line importing this script): npp_num_pages=20; (Recommended 20, but you can use any number from 1 to 50).
User:Primefac/revdel.js^(info): Is requesting revdel complicated and time consuming? This script helps simplify the process. Just have the Copyvio source URL and go to the history page and collect your diff IDs and you can drop them into the script Popups and it will create a revdel request for you.
User:Lourdes/PageCuration.js^(info): Creates a "Page Curation" link to Special:NewPagesFeed up near your sandbox link.
User:Writ Keeper/Scripts/deletionFinder.js: Creates links next to the title of each page which show up if it has been previously deleted or nominated for deletion.
User:Evad37/rater.js^(info): A fantastic tool for adding WikiProject templates to article talk pages. If you add: rater_autostartNamespaces = 0; to the next line on your common.js, the prompt will pop up automatically if a page has no Wikiproject templates on the talk page (note: this can be a bit annoying if you review redirects or dab pages commonly).

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:11, 17 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

NPR Newsletter No.14 21 October 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Pichpich, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

Backlog

As of 21 October 2018^[update], there are 3650 unreviewed articles and the backlog now stretches back 51 days.

Community Wishlist Proposal

There is currently an ongoing discussion regarding the drafting of a Community Wishlist Proposal for the purpose of requesting bug fixes and missing/useful features to be added to the New Page Feed and Curation Toolbar.
Please join the conversation as we only have until 29 October to draft this proposal!

Project updates

ORES predictions are now built-in to the feed. These automatically predict the class of an article as well as whether it may be spam, vandalism, or an attack page, and can be filtered by these criteria now allowing reviewers to better target articles that they prefer to review.
There are now tools being tested to automatically detect copyright violations in the feed. This detector may not be accurate all the time, though, so it shouldn't be relied on 100% and will only start working on new revisions to pages, not older pages in the backlog.

New scripts

User:Enterprisey/cv-revdel.js^(info) — A new script created for quickly placing {{copyvio-revdel}} on a page.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)} 20:49, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for your reviews ! Neverstopthat (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and cheers! Pichpich (talk) 17:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Frank Litsky / use of twitter as confirmation

Pichpich: I agree that currently there's no article (as of now) on Litsky's obit. My guess is the Times is currently writing one. Question: I can locate at least 2 twitter users (with blue checkmarks) who work for the Times referencing Litsky's passing. Can these be referenced as a source of attribution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by DarkStarHarry (talk • contribs) 17:12, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Art Aia - Creatives / In Residence

Hi Pichpich ,

An IP user had put the notability tag on Article Art Aia - Creatives / In / Residence. Do you think it is necessary to add additional sources in order to remove it ? Many thanks Neverstopthat (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 17:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well, to be honest, I don't think the tag is entirely without merit and I hesitated to place one myself. The references do backup specific claims (such as "artist X was there at some point") but only the first one really provides third-party coverage about Art Aia itself. So I'm ok with the tag remaining until more in-depth coverage can be found. Pichpich (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pichpich , How about adding this reference coming from this source where Art Aia is discussed in depth at a broadcast dated 26/09/2018 from min 35.41 to min 46.24 ?(talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:54, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't speak Italian so I can't say much about the content of that source and Google Translate is probably a few years away from translating audio! But the RAI is definitely a quality source so if it does have a 10 minute presentation of Art Aia, then I suggest you add it early in the article (in the lead paragraph for sure) and anywhere else where it can be used to verify the claims in the article (for instance, the "Venue" section has no references: could it be used there?). Adding this is probably enough to remove the notability tag. Pichpich (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you think would that provide enough coverage to remove the tag ? Neverstopthat (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I think so. If the IP user reinserts the tag, we'll just start a discussion about it on the talk page of the article. Pichpich (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Pichpich . I wonder how long it would Google to create audio translator . I bet by 202Oth it will be release . Neverstopthat (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:118.174.234.49

FYI. WP:DENY. ―Abelmoschus Esculentus 14:25, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thx for the tip. Pichpich (talk) 14:27, 9 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.15 16 November 2018

Chart of the New Pages Patrol backlog for the past 6 months.

Hello Pichpich,

Community Wishlist Survey – NPP needs you – Vote NOW

Community Wishlist Voting takes place 16 to 30 November for the Page Curation and New Pages Feed improvements, and other software requests. The NPP community is hoping for a good turnout in support of the requests to Santa for the tools we need. This is very important as we have been asking the Foundation for these upgrades for 4 years.

If this proposal does not make it into the top ten, it is likely that the tools will be given no support at all for the foreseeable future. So please put in a vote today.

We are counting on significant support not only from our own ranks, but from everyone who is concerned with maintaining a Wikipedia that is free of vandalism, promotion, flagrant financial exploitation and other pollution.

With all 650 reviewers voting for these urgently needed improvements, our requests would be unlikely to fail. See also The Signpost Special report: 'NPP: This could be heaven or this could be hell for new users – and for the reviewers', and if you are not sure what the wish list is all about, take a sneak peek at an article in this month's upcoming issue of The Signpost which unfortunately due to staff holidays and an impending US holiday will probably not be published until after voting has closed.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere ^{(or here)}18:37, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Pichpich. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

1954 United States gubernatorial elections

Hello Pichpich. I saw you moved this article back to the original title. Just a heads up that the naming convention for election articles (WP:NC-GAL) has just changed to put the year at the front. Most articles are going to be moved by a bot in the next few days, but any created after 1 October needed to be moved manually (hence me moving this one). Cheers, Number 5 7 20:57, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oh! (or should I say: Doh!) Thanks for the info. I was completely unaware of that debate. In any case, my main objective was to categorize these articles and at least that is done. Pichpich (talk) 21:00, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all. Cheers, Number 5 7 21:05, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Contact diode effect

A tag has been placed on Contact diode effect requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section R2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from the article namespace to a different namespace except the Category, Template, Wikipedia, Help, or Portal namespaces.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 18:33, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Job ads aggregator, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aggregator (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPR Newsletter No.16 15 December 2018

Hello Pichpich,

Reviewer of the Year

This year's award for the Reviewer of the Year goes to Onel5969. Around on Wikipedia since 2011, their staggering number of 26,554 reviews over the past twelve months makes them, together with an additional total of 275,285 edits, one of Wikipedia's most prolific users.

Thanks are also extended for their work to JTtheOG (15,059 reviews), Boleyn (12,760 reviews), Cwmhiraeth (9,001 reviews), Semmendinger (8,440 reviews), PRehse (8,092 reviews), Arthistorian1977 (5,306 reviews), Abishe (4,153 reviews), Barkeep49 (4,016 reviews), and Elmidae (3,615 reviews).
Cwmhiraeth, Semmendinger, Barkeep49, and Elmidae have been New Page Reviewers for less than a year — Barkeep49 for only seven months, while Boleyn, with an edit count of 250,000 since she joined Wikipedia in 2008, has been a bastion of New Page Patrol for many years.