User talk:Phyllis1753

Welcome!

Hello, Phyllis1753, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --rogerd 19:54, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well done on George Unwin

Well done for your contribution on this article. Capitalistroadster 19:36, 30 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Question about September 21

Hi Phillis, I'm confused about this edit. What was wrong with this entry?

1920 - Jay Ward, American animator (d. 1988)

-- Jim Douglas 00:59, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I get it now...born yesterday = September 20. -- Jim Douglas 01:02, 21 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Help!

Hi there. I guess us seniors should stick together but your recent edit looks a little like it could be OR- why do you say "act of courage" when all Ringo does is to wave? --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 17:17, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fine, it's just that I haven't seen the movie for a couple of weeks & that bit of the dialogue had slipped my mind. I bow to your better memory! --Rodhullandemu (please reply here - contribs) 17:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely lady; you may be right. But although it's plain from the scene that Ringo may be a coward, and that is a recurring theme right up to the end of the film, to say so, I think needs a reference. However, I don't see any reason to get hot under the collar about it. Regards, --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 01:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not at all. Your edit was totally valid, and my collar is accordingly chilled. --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 03:35, 16 February 2008 (UTC) Talk to me, please, Phyllis --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 03:42, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, I had no intention of pestering you. I will reply to your email once I've thought a little, but yesterday was a little strange here and I am in recovery mode. Cheers, --Rodhullandemu (Talk) 21:58, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wadena

Just wanted to let you know: despite its small size, Wadena, Iowa is legally a city. Nyttend (talk) 18:45, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

another member of the geriatric ward checking in

Hi Phyllis, nice to make your acquaintance (now doesn't that sound quaint?) as we both seem to inhabiting the same WikyWacky world. I hail (another way of telling I come from the Jurassic period) from the frozen north (I still have snow in my front yard!!). I think we may share some common interests, some of which are films and flight. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 23:08, 13 April 2008 (UTC). Well okay, just aviation topics, but that's a good start. FWiW Bzuk (talk) 00:47, 14 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]

YF/F-107/F-107A

Sorry I couldn't join in on the fun but being bereft of reference sources, and out in Mexico for a week and in Toronto twice on business and pleasure trips, I finally got a look at Steve Pace's X-Fighters: USAF Experimental and Prototype Fighters XP-59 to YF-23, Nico Sgarlato and Franco Ragni's U.S. Fighters of the Fifties and Robert F. Dorr and David Donald's Fighters of the United States Air Force. All of the sources agree that the aircraft type designation was the F-107 while the three prototypes were designated the YF-107A. FWiW, BillCj is a "good guy" just of the "anal-retentive variety" like most of us fuddy-duddies. Bzuk (talk) 13:30, 22 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]

Help! (film)

Hi. Long time, no see, but you've put a lot of good work into this article. How do you feel about getting it to Good Article status, if you can spare the time? Cheers. --Rodhull andemu 23:55, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Repost of Peacock words

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Peacock words, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Peacock words was previously deleted as a result of an articles for deletion (or another XfD)

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Peacock words, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 03:20, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Horn

P1753,

Back on the 21st of this month you "fixed" the article Tom Horn. But if you had done a compare on the history tab you would have seen a major vandalism done by 65.114.202.254 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log), where that user removed 1,673 bytes of information from the article, thus causing the indent that you found. If you see an indent like that try to figure out how it happened and who did it using the "History" tab, then you can really fix it. Thanks. > 4.240.78.183 (talk) 09:30, 29 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That time already?

Hey, Phyllis1753. Just stopping by to wish you a Happy Birthday from Rodhull andemu!
Have a great day!-- ~~~~

Awwwww... Thanks! 56 she is?! Where does it go etc.....? --Phyllis1753 (talk) 23:15, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm still a few months off. Sometime I still feel like I'm 18, and sometimes like 81. Hope you have a good day. --Rodhull andemu 23:29, 6 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Now in here was Sandy Denny singing "Who Knows Where The Time Goes" but the .ogg file was pulled...copyright violations or something...carry on

Nice! Sandy Denny had such a good voice. Hard to believe she's been gone 30 years now. Hmmm...mmm...mmm. Still, the one that really brings a tear to my eye at a time like this is Joni Mitchell's Circle Game. Me? I can still think young but it's like the Little Feat song "Old Folks Boogie"

"You know you're over the hill

When the mind's makin' promises

The body can't fill"

Cheers! --Phyllis1753 (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tsk! Rod you were bombed by a bot. Thanks, anyway--Phyllis1753 (talk) 17:18, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have remembered that would happen. Never mind, the sentiment remains. --Rodhull andemu 17:32, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And it's appreciated--Phyllis1753 (talk) 23:03, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Konrad Dannenberg

Hi,

I noticed you made some recent edits to the Konrad Dannenberg page. I am wondering if you could help me keep an eye out on this article. There is a troll who continually tries to vandalize the article using various aliases that are similar to mine in an attempt to impersonate me. I don't have the time to watch it every day and am wondering if you could help me. I didn't know Mr Dannenberg well but he was a very nice man and doesn't deserve this.

Thanks

NASA399 (talk) 06:51, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bramlett Article

You will forgive me for taking a slightly more firm line than you did with the miscreant, mouth-breathing drooler who is attempting to control the article.

(Oh, did I say all that out loud?)

Cheers. Rainbow-five (talk) 20:41, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, sic 'em! Cheers!--Phyllis1753 (talk) 22:08, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cass Hough

Writing an article about him? If so, good on ya. :-) Binksternet (talk) 20:04, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, no. There isn't much out there about him. He's always been one of those back-room-boy mystery men we've read about in connection with the 8th AF. Turns out to be a mundane story, in a way. He was the grandson of the man who invented the Daisy air rifle! Helped manage the Daisy company until he served in WW II, single handedly curing all the 8th's technical problems and diving every conceivable aircraft past the sound barrier, if you believe all the stories (there's probably one soul who believes he did it in a Cessna :^D), came back to Daisy where he rose to be President and retired in the early 70s. He died in 1990 at 85. His name popped into my head this AM and I had a Paul Harvey moment. "The rest of the story..." and all. Anyway, one website had him in a P-38 in Aug. '42 and I groaned. " Now it's a P-38." (I had always heard it was a P-47). I saw some sort of reference to this in the P-47 article and I thought to pass it along on the P-38 page just to cover that base. It doesn't have to be much, just a statement to the effect that a P-38 couldn't go supersonic if its life depended on it, with a citation to make it "official". Cheers!--Phyllis1753 (talk) 22:47, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Work last year on Strategic Air Command (film)

We have someone who is trying to cut out the section we wrote last year on Strategic Air Command. Please visit Talk:Strategic Air Command (film) to comment. -OberRanks (talk) 04:21, 20 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Identity question about {file:Terrytalbot.JPG}

Hi Phyllis1753, please take a look at the Mason Proffit edit history, an IP editor saying he's Terry Talbot has stated that your photo of Terry is actually Ron Schuetter. This could be a good faith mistake, it could be a hoax, or it could be Terry. Are there any other photos of Terry or Ron that we could match it up with? No offense, just looking for accuracy and verifiability. Regards, Chuckiesdad/Talk/Contribs 03:11, 5 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Turns out it was Ron Schuetter after all. Well, it was 40 years ago!--Phyllis1753 (talk) 02:44, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Another birthday

Not that milestones should become millstones. I envisage you retreating to your garage with your guitars every so often and just bashing out some major riffs, and I think that would be worth witnessing. I wish you very well, and hope your own day was special for you. Regards, and as far is possible here, love to you. Rodhull andemu 02:00, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help expand the Coe article?

I'm not an alumnus, just married to one; don't have much to add not taken from the copies of the Arrow scattered around our bedroom, and those are not reliable sources. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:01, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monnette Sudler

(Ignore this. There I was in the middle of adding refs to the article and I get tagged by some eager-beaver for not having refs. Jeez-louise!)

The article Monnette Sudler has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Claritas (talk) 17:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Go for it. Since the article has the one required source you may now remove the PROD and get on with it. Cheers. Rodhull andemu 17:30, 6 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Original Research

Made you look. Gotcha! =)

My kind of woman. Keep on chooglin', as they say. Rodhull andemu 02:15, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

email on way to you. Cheers. Rodhull andemu 02:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Colorado-class battleship

Hi there, if you could add more information and citations from Newhart, we could collaborate and nominate it for A and FA. I haven't done anything more with it since I wrote it because I don't have any other sources besides Friedman. If Newhart gives ship histories, it would be nice to have additional citations to the relevant sections because the FAC people do not like DANFS (rightfully, as it tends to gloss over negative periods in the ship's or US history). —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 22:17, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well, thanks anyway :) —Ed (talk • majestic titan) 01:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May you have a day full of WikiLove

	Happy Valentine's Day
	All the best for one of Wikipedia's best! (Feel free to send this to your other Valentines) Smallbones (talk) 00:45, 14 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Washington Cemetery (Washington Court House, Ohio)

Thank you for pointing out the error in the DYK hook. I wrote the hook, so I apologise; you'll note that the article text always said that he was the attorney general, so I obviously had a mental lapse when writing the hook after the article was done. Perhaps the biggest question is why it wasn't caught by the reviewer, but he's recently placed {{retired}} on his userpage, so I'll not bug him. Nyttend (talk) 02:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. Thanks for correcting it. I'm something of a history student of the inter-war era so that error leapt out at me. Cheers!--Phyllis1753 (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to September 17 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Modi]], Indian politician, 14th [[Chief Minister of Gujarat]], current Prime Minister of India]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:36, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Thanks. --Phyllis1753 (talk) 00:58, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Phyllis1753. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Phyllis1753. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Miss you

It's been a long time since you've edited, and I wanted to say we miss you. Give the age of some of the photos you took and uploaded, you may no longer be on this Earth. If so, I pray you're in a better place, where we can meet someday. God bless you and your family. BilCat (talk) 19:48, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

RFC: El Cerrito High School

Hello Phyllis, I am looking over archival sources for El Cerrito High School, I saw that you edited the page way back in 2007[1]. As far as I've seen, this is the only reference ive seen on the internet saying that ECHS was a WAP project. I'm wondering if theres any chance at all that you remember anything about where you heard that / got that information. Thank you!

- notmysql ('25) Notnotmysql (talk) 04:00, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]