User talk:Phunky Phresh
Phunky Phresh, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Phunky Phresh! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 20:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC) |
April 2018
[edit]
Hello, I'm Rivertorch. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Dildo have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. RivertorchFIREWATER 07:54, 29 April 2018 (UTC)
August 2018
[edit] Hello, I'm PolicyReformer. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Body worship— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. --Policy Reformer(c) 23:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Phunky Phresh. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
"Close proximity" and "Period of time"
[edit]You have beefs with these phrases for some reason? I've seen "close proximity" used commonly. ViperSnake151 Talk 00:57, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- I just came by to thank Phunky_Phresh for these edits. Yes, they're commonly used, wisely avoided phrases. They're redundant. "Proximity" means "closeness"; there's no such thing as "far proximity" from which a distinction needs to be made. "Period of time" can generally be replaced by "period". A good copy editor removes words that make no contribution to meaning. Largoplazo (talk) 01:05, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. These phrases, and others such as “rate of speed,” are redundant and needlessly wordy. Removing them improves flow and overall writing quality. Just because they appear commonly doesn’t mean they are examples of good writing. I occasionally go through “binges” of cleaning up such phrases in articles just for fun. I do the same for expletive constructions and passive voice use. Phunky Phresh (talk) 13:32, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
Thanks for the message. These phrases, and others such as “rate of speed,” are redundant and needlessly wordy. Removing them improves flow and overall writing quality. Just because they appear commonly doesn’t mean they are examples of good writing. I occasionally go through “binges” of cleaning up such phrases in articles just for fun. I do the same for expletive constructions and passive voice use. Phunky Phresh (talk) 13:33, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
- I appreciate the effort. I once replaced the precious and subjective "at a/the tender age" on hundreds of pages. I kind of wished I hadn't turned off the option to add them to my watchlist, though. Largoplazo (talk) 14:36, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
"Close proximity"
[edit]OMG, "close proximity" appears in thousands of articles! I was thinking of running through them in AutoWikiBrowser, but there aren't enough hours in the day. More power to you! Largoplazo (talk) 00:59, 7 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |