User talk:Phoenix.K1918/sandbox

Brody Scott Peer Review From Email

"Hey Phoenix, number 2, 10, 11, 13 don't link on the main page"

Brody Scott Peer Review

The article is very clearly laid out. There is an immense amount of links throughout the page which I find very powerful.

Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?

     -Everything is clear and relevant. Nothing distracted me, the article is very clean.
     

Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?

     -The article is very neutral, there seems to be no bias anywhere. It is straight forward and speaks from a neutral tone. 
     

Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?

     -No viewpoint is under or overrepresented, the article is very well balanced. 
     

Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?

     -Have contacted over number 10,11 and 13 that do not link. Other then that the other 13 links work.
     

Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?

     -Yes. Every single fact is sourced and cited correctly from strong sources. The sources all seem to be neutral as they come from a variety of different organizations and writers. There does not seem to be any conflict with bias and this article. 
     

Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?

     -Every source is up to date and taken from current information. There is more new sources than anything, which is unique to what I have seen on most pages.