User talk:Phirkaisadarr

October 2015

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Rishi Kapoor. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 12:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Rishi Kapoor, you may be blocked from editing.

Please familiarise yourslef with WP:UNDUE and WP:NPOV and stop adding unsourced non-neutral details about films that "were successful" or (even worse) "worked". Rishi Kapoor has much, much too much detail already, in order to become a useful article it needs to be trimmed, not overloaded even more.

What user names have you used when editing Wikipedia in the past? bonadea contributions talk 18:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This warning needs to be sent to Bonadea!! Bonadea has vandalized by keeping quiet on the matter.

The Rishi Kapoor article - is presently glorifying him unnecessarily. You are removing fact that he had only 11 successful films from 51 solo hero films and that he had only 25 successful films of the multi star films he did!

By not mentioning the article is excessive of POV and is not adhering to neutral point of view! The article is keeping quiet on whether of the 92 films he did as lead hero, all were successful? No. Majority were disasters(only 36 films of 92 have been successful).

Also if the articles is excessively detailed, remove the sentence that says he had 92 films as lead hero and do not mention the names of films which were successful!! since filmography is already provided , why do you need to mention any film for that matter!

If it is mentioned that he did 92 films as lead hero, break up of how many were successful has to be mentioned to DEMYSTIFY his career! Phirkaisadarr (talk) 08:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re "vandalizing by keeping quiet" - well, you know how many articles there are in Wikipedia. It's completely impossible to clean up every single article you discover that needs work - after all, this is something we all do in our spare time! In any case, thank you for your most recent edits, which did go some considerable way towards improving the article. --bonadea contributions talk 09:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or sock puppetry.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! 220 of ^Borg 17:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]