User talk:PhillyPartTwo

Welcome

Hello, PhillyPartTwo, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 14:39, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

MTV Unplugged

Hello PhillyPartTwo, I saw your edits at MTV Unplugged, but I could not find any references regarding the Neil Young Freedom tour being an official MTV Unplugged show. Or is it that in that tour he performed some acoustic versions of his songs? Thank you! --Kio 02:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the only reference I have is that I watched the thing myself at the time and I still have it on VHS... that's as good as I can do!

I have no doubts that Neil Young performed in its Freedom tour (and that you saw it)... but, was it really a MTV Unplugged performmance? I believe the Freedom tour began before the MTV unplugged series started... --Kio 01:44, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Note

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Jeff Garlin, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. EVula // talk // ☯ // 14:29, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary usage

Hi there. When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field. If you are adding a section, please do not just keep the previous section's header in the Edit summary field - please fill in your new section's name instead. Thank you. Ohmpandya (Talk) 23:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of CBS Mandate

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is CBS Mandate. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CBS Mandate (2nd nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:13, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cliff Lee

Your edits have been reverted. The trade is not official, and it could be called off if the physicals don't go well. Until it is official, Lee is an Indian. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:06, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How many sites that say 'done deal', including the Phillies and Indians sites do you want to see? EVERY trade is not final until physicals. The trade is done. The trade is final. It has passed the Commissioner's office. If someone fails the physical the trade is canceled. It is not dependent on the physical. The trade is complete. If the physical is failed, then the trade is nullified, but the trade did happen. Sorry to burst your bubble. -- Me, now.

If a player fails a physical, it nullifies the trade, meaning the players don't change teams. Therefore, if Carlos Carrasco fails his physical, Cliff Lee remains an Indian; the deal doesn't go through. Therefore we don't change his team until we know the deal is official. --Muboshgu (talk) 20:50, 29 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No point arguing with a stubborn mind. You win. It's never stopped any other player ever on here from being changed upon official word of his trade/signing, but you can feel all kinds of important and keep it Cleveland for 10 more hours. Enjoy. - Me, now.

Toyota recall

The recall is in progress or planned for several countries, not just the USA. By including that and other information that you have done and the article will be nicer! Suomi Finland 2009 (talk) 18:54, 29 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have already noted the recall in Europe and China on the page. I don't have enough information to expand at this time, but I will keep an eye on it. The acceleration incidents seem to have been confined to the US.

ITN for 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall

On 30 January 2010, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article 2010 Toyota Vehicle Recall, which you created. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the candidates page.

--BorgQueen (talk) 00:12, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! 21655 ^{ταλκ/01ҁ} 00:50, 30 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:WaitingForArmytoDie.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Shubinator (talk) 03:13, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Do not remove FfD entries or tags indicating FfD listings from file pages. Continue to do so and you will be blocked. ÷seresin 04:26, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:5Portraits3.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:5Portraits3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --Blurpeace 05:24, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The Mayerson Law Offices, P.C.

I now see that this is an established office and has a Wikipedia article. If it was up to me I wouldn't use their website as a source; I'd probably find something a bit more neutral. Something a bit more removed from the business of making money off these kinds of incidents and accident articles that you're working on. Catch you around. Dawnseeker2000 16:47, 17 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is not spam nor promotion. This is legitimate legal and information subject matter. I do not represent nor work for any company or firm.

Domonic Brown

Crossing Broad is in no way a reliable source for the Domonic Brown call-up. You need to wait until it's officially announced by the team, per WP:CRYSTAL. Stop inserting information that's not verifiable by reliable sources. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 18:04, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Already changed source to USA Today. PhillyPartTwo

That's a community-edited forum, not a reliable source, regardless of its being hosted on USA Today. — KV5 • Talk • 18:08, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sourced MSNBC as well. - PhillyPartTwo

Fine dude, you win. If you really want your 'special' writing in the article instead of mine, so be it. This clearly is quite important for you for some reason. You could had just undid or put back my edits, but it's fine whateverdude.

It doesn't have anything to do with "my writing" or "your writing"; it had to do with sourcing. Once I found a reliable source, I put the information back in the article. Please keep in mind that Wikipedia is never about being "right" or "wrong"; it's about being factually accurate and neutral. Thanks. — KV5 • Talk • 18:17, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If that helps you sleep at night. - PhillyPartTwo

File source problem with File:LawBuilding3.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LawBuilding3.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:29, 27 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:5Portraits3.jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:14, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one of your uploads, File:AnthonyWayne.jpg, has also had some information automatically added. If you get a moment, please review the bot's contributions there as well. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:01, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

FYI: Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/ZeroesAndOnes The Banner talk 01:13, 1 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mayerson Law for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mayerson Law is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mayerson Law until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 13:16, 2 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. OSborn ^arf_contribs. 04:26, 12 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Feith Systems' BridgeLogiQ software product logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:25, 8 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Meeting House Law Building & Gallery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 22:33, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Feith Logo smaller.png

Thank you for uploading File:Feith Logo smaller.png. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Feith Systems Logo.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Feith Systems Logo.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:48, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhoad'sBuryingGroundsmall.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Rhoad'sBuryingGroundsmall.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:19, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:WaltWhitmanPastel2.jpg

The file File:WaltWhitmanPastel2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not suitable for encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:20, 21 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Yous

@Jpgordon: Thank you. Greatly appreciated. Nice to be back. MPH (talk) 01:17, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

PhillyPartTwo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

This account has been blocked for four years. I no longer work for the organization that lay at the issue of this sockpuppetry problem, nor am I associated with the owner of the account that created the article in question. This is a personal account unassociated with that former organization, and have never had an issue related to any personal work or work not related to that organization. It is my belief that four years is long enough for punishment to have been met and good faith in continuing forward as a productive member of the Wikipedia community. My positive contributions are many (including an article that wound up on the news homepage), and I have no current associations with any fraudulent or disruptive accounts or organizations. I hope you can understand that four years blocked is a long time, and no further interruptions from this user will occur. I would ask for contrition and leniency and call this time served, and request this account unblocked so I can continue to make edits in the name of my account which has been doing positive for the Wikipedia community for 15 years. Thank you.

Accept reason:

I took a look at your edits, and I believe you. You've a history of perfectly good edits and good encyclopedia creation; your only previous block was 12 hours for an edit war about an known-but-not-announced player trade; you don't seem to me to be a threat to Wikipedia. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 00:54, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, PhillyPartTwo. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rah Rah (band), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Regina (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:01, 1 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 27

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Zeno Mountain Farm, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musical (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:58, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Julie Klausner, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Big Mouth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:29, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Needlework Guild of America

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:Needlework Guild of America, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other test edits you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:38, 21 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]