User talk:Phillicia Cattertails
Hi! Welcome to Wikipedia! First and foremost, we are an encyclopedia. You should begin contributing by reading these pages:
- Start at Wikipedia:Introduction. But if you're too busy to click through a few screens, try this basic table of how to write Wikipedia's links, headings, etc.
- You want to make sure you know the Five Pillars of Wikipedia. I've summarized them here (although you still should read the full page):
- Wikipedia is an encyclopedia. Try for accuracy and verifiability, and don't try to create articles about yourself, your friends, dog, school, or company... not, at least, until you have read the criteria for notability and know that what you're writing about meets those criteria.
- Wikipedia has a neutral point of view policy. Give reasonable weight to all sides of an issue, without overemphasizing any one view, and without inflating fringe views.
- Wikipedia is free content (licensed under the GFDL) and can be edited by anyone. No one is a webmaster (except maybe Jimmy Wales) and anyone can change any article that you make with certain exceptions.
- Wikipedia does have a code of conduct. Do not attack anyone, and be civil, avoid making personal attacks, find consensus for your changes, avoid edit wars, follow the three-revert rule, and remember that there are about 2 million articles out there and you don't have to get into any disputes about any one article.
- Wikipedia does not have any firm rules. Be bold, because nobody is perfect and you don't have to have a perfect encyclopedia article the first time around. Don't worry about messing up, either, because all previous versions are kept (check the "History" tab at the top of the page for all those previous versions!) and can be accessed.
- There is a help page for new contributors.
And above all, this is an encyclopedia! Happy editing! ~user:orngjce223 how am I typing? 03:54, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
I'd recommend just going right after it! If you're adding useful info, even if you are formatting something incorrectly, someone can always come along and improve the formatting. I'd certainly be happy to check anything out for you, if you're uncertain it's appropriate.
When it comes to referencing an article that seems to have a strong opinion, you can always indicate that opinion by prefacing the sentence, "According to So-and-So of the New Yorker Magazine..." Even when there are strong opinions involved, if they are from reputable sources, they would add to the article.
Any questions, I'd certainly be happy to help! DBaba (talk) 17:28, 26 January 2008 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
[edit]
|
Hi, I am a relative of John Nicol living currently in the UK and also a songwriter. I have been trying to get a copy of his songs, as I thought it would be nice to do something with them. If you know any way to get hold of the person you mentioned who republished the poetry, or have any ideas in general, I would be very greatful to hear from you. I don't use wikipedia much, so if you could email me at nikbarrell@gmail.com that would be great. Thanks very much.. Nik. Nikolasbarrell (talk) 19:10, 24 October 2012 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of File:John Nicol Title page sm.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:John Nicol Title page sm.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cloudbound (talk) 16:38, 1 June 2016 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:JohnNicol Title sm.jpg
[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:JohnNicol Title sm.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused duplicate or lower-quality copy of another file on Wikipedia having the same file format, and all inward links have been updated.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:11, 27 April 2018 (UTC)
The file File:JohnNicol Title lo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
unused, low-res, no obvious use
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.
Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 1 July 2019 (UTC)
