User talk:Philippinesfan

This is Philippinesfan's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1st.One (October 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1st.One and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1st.One, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Philippinesfan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 14:35, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Philippinesfan (talk) 09:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

Your edit to Iz*One has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Evaders99 (talk) 20:22, 20 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1stOne (group) (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JavaHurricane was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1stOne (group) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1stOne (group), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Java Hurricane 07:25, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Philippinesfan (talk) 09:19, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 1stOne (group) (November 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SK2242 was:

Why did you resubmit with zero improvement? Do that again and this page will be listed at Miscellany for deletion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:1stOne (group) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:1stOne (group), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SK2242 (talk) 07:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Philippinesfan (talk) 02:38, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit on Bini

Excuse me, can you please stop adding template vandalism as you did on Bini (group)? You can't add it unless you're an administrator. See Template:Pp-vandalism. And also you added a short description of it but can't you see that it is already in the article? You can see it at the top. — ArriehM 💬 08:58, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to put page protection, you can request. See Wikipedia:Requests for page protection. Thanks! ArriehM (talk) 11:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Hello Philippinesfan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Philippinesfan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Philippinesfan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. CMD (talk) 05:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove an Articles for deletion notice or a comment from an AfD discussion, as you did at BABY BLUE. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 12:48, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Culture of the Philippines

added links pointing to Western, Korean, Kapampangan, Ilocano and Pop

List of Philippine-based music groups

added links pointing to Band, EDM, Idol, Pop and It's Showtime

2020 in Philippine music

added links pointing to EDM and Pop

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Baby blue, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 02:37, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Php (group) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Php (group), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:10, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Putang ina nyo Philippinesfan (talk) 07:53, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't curse or say bad words. They just need some references for your articles that's why your articles were moved to draft. Some of the references u put are from YouTube which is not suitable or allowed. Please do some research, put a reliable source (example: from ABS-CBN, GMA, and another Philippine news website) and make sure the website u put is RELIABLE. Thank you! I hope it helps! ArriehM (talk) 03:00, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please bakit NYO po inilagay sa draft! Tsaka inform po Naman ako ah inilagay NYO lang sa draft Kase gusto NYO na mapasainyo yun Philippinesfan (talk) 03:50, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please Naman Philippinesfan (talk) 03:52, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

English: Hi. Actually, we don't want to seize your articles. It's just, your articles are bad, or do not cite any independent or reliable sources to be an article. If you want to know more please visit Wikipedia:How to create a page. Use independent sources or references like ABS-CBN News and GMA News, AGAIN, DON'T USE YOUTUBE AS A SOURCE OR REFERENCE. It is not allowed. Please do some research and improve your article and please try to use the English language because this is English Wikipedia, Thanks!

Tagalog: Kamusta! ang totoo niyan, hindi namin gustong agawin mula sa'yo ang iyong mga artikulo. basta, ang iyong artikulo ay masama o hindi sumisipi o bumabanggit ng anumang malaya o independent na pinagmulan/kinunan ng sources para ito ay maging isang ganap at maging opisyal na Artikulo. Kung gusto mong malaman ang iba, bisitahin ang Wikipedia:How to create a page. Gumamit ng independent na sources o mga sanggunian tulad ng ABS-CBN News o GMA News. Muli, huwag gamitin ang YouTube bilang sources. Hindi ito ina-allowed. Manaliksik at ipagpabuti ang iyong mga artikulo at pakiusap, gumamit ng English na lengwahe sapagkat ito ay English Wikipedia, Salamat! ArriehM (talk) 09:57, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I went through that also, just read some of wikipedia rules and their requirements for an article. Keep it up bro! ArriehM (talk) 10:01, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Xoxo (group) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Xoxo (group), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. power~enwiki (π, ν) 06:12, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of XOXO (Girl Group)

The article XOXO (Girl Group) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No independent sources establishing the notability of this band.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Passenger pigeon (talk) 06:33, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, XOXO (Girl Group)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, XOXO (Girl Group). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Draft:XOXO (group). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Draft:XOXO (group). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at [[Talk:Draft:XOXO (group)|the article's talk page]].

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. CMD (talk) 07:43, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. CMD (talk) 07:52, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BABY BLUE

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BABY BLUE requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:23, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello this is BABY BLUE STAFF please don't delete it because fans see it and don't delete it please the information about BABY BLUR is right.

Thank you please we are so sad so hard to edit it and the information are so hard.

Our hardworking but you will delete it 😔 Philippinesfan (talk) 06:38, 19 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your Articles.

Hi! If you're going to continue creating pages like this List of P-Pop Artist you might be block from editing, John B123 already put redirect twice, he is right and you're wrong, it is the same as List of Philippine-based music groups. Please stop it. Thank you! ArriehM (talk) 09:14, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tanga Philippinesfan (talk) 01:53, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about BABY BLUE

Hello, Philippinesfan, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username John B123, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, BABY BLUE, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BABY BLUE.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not ballot-polls. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|John B123}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

John B123 (talk) 09:15, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with BABY BLUE. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --John B123 (talk) 12:46, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

FirstOne moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, FirstOne, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 12:57, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 13:59, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One account per person

Please have a look at WP:ROLE:

Because an account represents your edits as an individual, "role accounts", or accounts shared by multiple people, are as a rule forbidden and blocked.

Note, however, that we also prohibit meat puppetry: The block applies to you as a person, so you and your coworkers are not allowed to create a new account while this block is in place.

For an unblock to happen, you'd need to credibly assure us that only one person has access to the account (password changed, email account not accessible by anyone else), and that you do not intend to promote your business further. You'd need to provide specific examples for edits you would like to make in the future, and these must have nothing to do with those you got blocked for. If you are currently not interested in contributing to Wikipedia in any other way than advertising/promoting, you will not be unblocked. As there is no time limit for an appeal, please wait until your intentions ever change. At the moment, they're incompatible with the encyclopedia. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 14:05, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fuck you Philippinesfan (talk) 03:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Philippinesfan. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:27, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philippinesfan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Im sorry it's my fault I want to edit some page but WayKurat other blocked me because I need to edit good article, please unblock me

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. — O Still Small Voice of Clam 09:24, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2021

UTRS decline

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Please describe in greater detail how your editing was unconstructive and how you would edit constructively if unblocked. ( Please read Wikipedia's Guide to appealing blocks for more information. (https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Guide_to_appealing_blocks) As you still have access to your talk page, please post your unblock request to your user talk page, omitting any off-Wiki personally identifying information. If you have not already done so, please place the following at the bottom of your talk page, filling in "Your reason here "

 {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Thank you for your attention to these matters. Please see UTRS appeal #41258

--Deepfriedokra (talk) 02:50, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Update. As you are globally locked, you will need to request unblock at UTRS. --Deepfriedokra (talk) 16:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:XOXO (group)

Hello, Philippinesfan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:XOXO (group), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:XOXO (group)

Hello, Philippinesfan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "XOXO".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:44, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:PHP (band)

Hello, Philippinesfan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PHP".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 00:38, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]