Jump to content

User talk:Philhellenism

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2006 - 2008 Archives

[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Georgios Vafopoulos. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Fut.Perf. 06:26, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

[edit]

I have reviewed some more of your contributions. You were apparently heavily involved, back in 2006, in the vandalism on the impersonation account User:Risto Stefov. I have no idea why you weren't indef-banned right then and there. You obviously should have been. Since then, you have persistently abused Wikipedia by using that dead account's talk page as a dumping ground for your nationalist rants, most recently just today with your IP [1].

As far as your other contributions are concerned, I can see nothing but: misusing various talkpages as a forum for your opinion rants; posting irrelevant and tendentious external links to various articles; and posting copyright violations both in text and image.

I see no useful contributions whatsoever.

You are therefore now blocked indefinitely. Fut.Perf. 13:34, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Philhellenism (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

your reason here

Decline reason:

FPaS' observation that you have a nationalist battle stance here certainly seems accurate to me. We really don't need any more of that, and if it had been brought to your attention in the past, it hasn't sunk in because you are still making such comments; the edit Future Perfect points out is one example; your recent comments at Talk:Macedonia naming dispute are others. If you want to be unblocked you are going to have actually address this issue: it is a problem, it is a current problem, and at the very least, any unblock request needs to address the substance of these issues. Mangojuicetalk 15:48, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:

I recently had my account suspended by Future Perfect at Sunrise.

I would like someone to review this, and hopefully unblock the account. Many of the actions Future Perfect at Sunrise makes reference to happened 3 years ago, and any more recent events have been brought to my attention, at which point I addressed them, through compliance or dialogue with the user who brought the matter to my attention.

In my opinion, for this to happen after three years is a bit much, especially that one of a handful of users that I have liaised with over the years has been Future Perfect at Sunrise, but when he was known as Future Perfect.

Regards, Φilhellenism 01:05, 20 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

UNBLOCK REQUEST

[edit]

Haven't I used the templete correctly?

Φilhellenism 09:00, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You did, and you got a response to it, above. You can of course post a new request, if you have something to say that addresses the issues pointed out to you last time. Fut.Perf. 10:50, 4 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eikonografia.jpg listed for deletion

[edit]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, File:Eikonografia.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Calliopejen1 (talk) 17:48, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

[edit]

Hello Philhellenism! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

  1. Evangelos Kofos - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 09:44, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Nikolaos Martis, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.hri.org/Martis/contents/author.html, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Nikolaos Martis saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! — Wyliepedia 04:37, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The article Evangelos Kofos has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

BLP with no sources made prior to Mar 2010

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:29, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Theodoros Kolokotronis.jpg

[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Theodoros Kolokotronis.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

  • make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
  • Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Kelly hi! 22:18, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

The file File:Byzantine1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]