User talk:Pflatau

Atmospheric thermodynamics

Good work on that image contribution and discussion section:--Sadi Carnot 00:37, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wilhelm von Bezold

Thank you for contributing this stub! I have announced it at Portal:Germany/New article announcements. If you write more about German scientists, please announce your articles there. Thank you, and happy editing! Kusma (討論) 16:31, 1 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Soil

I am hoping tha some aspects of this project will interest you. Cheers! -- 67.185.75.97 07:09, 8 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

GW cat changes

You've moved many pages into cl-ch-feedbacks-and-causes. Why is Global cooling in this cat? Or GW?

William M. Connolley 07:04, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There are several cooling mechanisms proposed: aerosols (non absorbing) reflection, orbital changes, sun activity, increased cloud cover (reflection). All of them are feedbacks - one adds something (say reflecting aerosols) and Earth's surface is cooling. Some of these feedbacks are related to aerosols and clouds (so called Twomey effects) - i.e. aerosols influence cloud microphysics (droplet size) which causes more reflection (e.g. "ship tracks") This is why I moved greenhouse effect, aerosol effect, cloud effect, orbital, sunspots to "climate change feedbacks and causes". Same with GW. Global warming is based on feedbacks (CO2 introduced --> water vapor increases --> temperature changes; direct CO2 effect is relatively small). Either through increased CO2, or absorbing soot, etc. Now, the main reason was that I wanted to separate climate change policy, assessment (mostly IPCC), from climate change feedbacks; i.e. to separate politics from science. Also (important) I wanted to intruduce classification in climate change categories, because there were too many articles in one category. More work is needed there and help will be appreciated. I have noticed that "forcing", "attribution" and "causes" are similiar and we will need to address this bu adjusting category names slightly. But, I think that "climate change policy", "climate change assesment", "cimate change feedbacks", "climate change forcings" can form basis for the category "climate change". With "global warming" and "global cooling" we can move them back to "climate change" mostly because of their prominence; agree. Pflatau 14:33, 21 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A quick hello

Peter, this is you, right? Just saying hello. It's been quite a while. Raymond Arritt 00:53, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mesoscale Convective Complex‎

My apologies for my revert of your edit. It took me a moment to see what you had done - I thought I had reverted myself, but I see that you beat me to it :) Crimsone 16:45, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

A study on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies

Hi. I would like to ask whether you would agree to participate in a short survey on how to cover scientific uncertainties/controversies in articles pertaining to global warming and climate change. If interested, please get in touch via my talkpage or email me Encyclopaedia21 (talk) 18:24, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

David Derman

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of David Derman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://pythia.uoregon.edu/~llynch/Tango-L/2001/msg02412.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 01:12, 20 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Pflatau! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 3 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Norberto Esbrez - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 22:09, 17 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

List of atmospheric radiative transfer codes

Hi. I have cleanup plans for List of atmospheric radiative transfer codes, see the talk page there. Since you have worked on the article, I would like you to take part in the discussion on how to improve it. --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 10:11, 5 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Christy Coté for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Christy Coté is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christy Coté until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. J N 466 18:17, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Edward Flatau, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Polish. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:02, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Edward Flatau may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

left|First page of ''Das Gesetz der excentrischen Lagerung der langen Bahnen im Ruckenmark'' 1897).]]
till 7pm and 1/2. This is medical doctor seal from a medical prescription issued on 27 August 1920).]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 16:13, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Basic meteorological concepts and phenomena has been nominated for discussion

Category:Basic meteorological concepts and phenomena, which you created, has been nominated for merging with Category:Meteorological phenomena. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you.

Category:Satellite meteorology and remote sensing has been nominated for renaming

Category:Satellite meteorology and remote sensing has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 15:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of David Derman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article David Derman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/David Derman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 04:01, 17 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Marine meteorology and sailing has been nominated for renaming

Category:Marine meteorology and sailing has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 14:51, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tanguero and milonguero

A tag has been placed on Category:Tanguero and milonguero indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:37, 4 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]