User talk:Peterborofan1982

Prisoner Overseas

Will suggest that the article not be deleted as it does show the wide variety of the very muddled UK transmission of the most populart late night acquisition. I think that there is no other series in the world (or TV network) which would have had towns two miles apart having a wait of eight years between them seeing the same episode (for the first time) eg Meridian and Central with episodes around 580. I have all the details that are on here myself and am in the process of putting them all on a separate site when I have around 75% of exact airdates. I have all UK airdates from 1984 upto early 1995 and need to check on a few TSW days and then complete all regions after 1995. Australia I have most Melbourne airdates but these need more checking as I need to clarify which were single episode slots and which were double. Sydney airdates will be added too. NZ also. Other Aust cities and US too difficult to get info on. Sweden dates come from sun-and-rain.harnosand.org Hopefully this wiki page will not be deleted (yet). :)

Hi Peterborofan1982....Click on THIS ARTICLE'S ENTRY on the top section on the Prisoner overseas page where it reads about Wikipedia's deletion policy. Leave a comment to KEEP the article. thanks

Page moves

You have recently made several moves concerning European football competitions, on the flimsiest of reasons and against the established consensus. Please do not make such page moves, which take time and effort to undo. If you wish to propose a page move, then discuss it first, and consider following the instrictions at WP:RM. There are often good reasonsfor particular page titles which you may be unaware of. --Stemonitis 10:11, 8 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Prisoner Information

All of these dates given are meaningless. There is no proof that any of them are real or accurate. They are also very hard to understand as they are not shown in the am and pm format. How can it be real that an network affiliate would start a program in 1984 and then others like Angela start it years later at an odd early morning hour? It was also shown for a short while in the U.S. but was not on for too long. You gotta add on how you know that these details are correct. I have looked at itv.com and I can see that all the affiliates have the same programs all day and night. So I mistrust these wikipedia submissions. --Katmason 10:37, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Kazakhstan

Thanks for reverting your own tests. Please don't make test edits in articles again; use the sandbox.
— FIRE!^{in a crowded theatre...} 13:36, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Peterborofan1982! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 2 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Yoon Deuk-Yeo - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:12, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lagganlia

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Lagganlia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. smileguy91^talk 14:14, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:39, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Peterborofan1982. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]