Jump to content

User talk:PerspicazHistorian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome![edit]

Thanks for creating a draft!

Hello PerspicazHistorian, welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Liance, and I've been editing here for a while. I wanted to thank you for submitting Draft:Lingayat Vani (caste) to WikiProject Articles for Creation and helping to grow the encyclopedia! We appreciate your contributions and hope you stick around. I can see you've already started writing draft articles, so here are a few more resources that might be helpful:

I highly recommend visiting The Teahouse if you are unsure about anything Wiki related. It's a place where experienced editors answer questions and assist newcomers in the editing process. In addition, please do not hesitate to reach out on my talk page if you have any specific questions. Once again, welcome! I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Liancetalk 00:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Appa (Title) has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Appa (Title). Thanks! GrabUp - Talk 08:00, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Appa (title) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Appa (title). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GrabUp - Talk 08:07, 29 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devane (surname) (July 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SafariScribe was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, PerspicazHistorian! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 05:40, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devane (surname) (July 4)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikishovel was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Wikishovel (talk) 06:29, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Devane (surname), without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 11:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

added citations and some additional info. Thanks for guidance. Regards PerspicazHistorian (talk) 11:24, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, and good luck with the review. But please stop removing the templates from the previous submissions: they are vital guidance for reviewers. Wikishovel (talk) 11:46, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hi PerspicazHistorian! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:06, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to routinely mark your edits as minor, although many of them aren't – eg. this edit added an entire new section, amounting to 10%+ more content, to an article; there is simply no way that could be considered 'minor' by any measure. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
okay, will take care now onwards. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → check Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:08, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

learnt just now that giving a summary is important, thanks PerspicazHistorian (talk) 12:11, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Indian honorifics, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Appa. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:07, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Devane (surname) (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 14:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The topic is legitimately qualified to be added as an article . In India every surname has a history linked to them . When it comes to cattles:- I just added briefly to mention for what the city is famous for. Surnames in India usually represent a deep history and therefore mentioning other details is justified. Please do not reject it again and if necessary let me know what should be improved. The draft is still under development and new citations and edits are being made timely. Thank You! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:00, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Any history needs to be verified by reliable secondary sources. The cattle don't matter. You keep submitting this, again and again, and it wasn't ready. Plus, reading your other draft (see below) makes me wonder if you truly understand what reliable secondary sources are. Drmies (talk) 15:09, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies please tell which sources are not reliable. PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:11, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I did, below, for that other article. This is not a reliable source. This is not a reliable source. What even is this? And you put the cattle back in. Drmies (talk) 15:14, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
See brother This page is related to "marathi" LANGUAGE. Tell me atleast if you know this language or not. If you don't there is no logic debating you. And when it comes to adding cattle stuff , I appreciate your help to the matter and will edit it (but still keep an short brief of it). Thanks! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:21, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not your brother. Cattle is not language. Drmies (talk) 21:29, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Appa (title) (July 6)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Drmies was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Drmies (talk) 14:33, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is a collection of Wikipedia articles: it cannot be used as a source for Wikipedia articles. Drmies (talk) 14:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

changed some citations, Please remove the deletion tag. Thank You! PerspicazHistorian (talk) 15:39, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
There is no deletion tag. I don't see how anyone would accept that in the state it's in. Drmies (talk) 21:30, 6 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]