Jump to content

User talk:Persian Poet Gal/Archive2

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia



The current Wikipedia time is:
09:45, Tuesday, 26 November 2024 (UTC)
To update time purge the cache!


Archive 2

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, I passed. I appreciate your input. Please keep an eye on me(if you want) to see if a screw up. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 16:44, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

wikipedians

I know that there are more wikipedians but,how do I find them?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Usaman2 (talk • contribs)

Dork 'Stereotype'...

I didn't 'add' any nonsense to the 'dork' article, I removed the inaccurate stereotype description. The stereotype there is describing a nerd. Look at the 'nerd' article and look at the pictures on there, which clearly fit the description listed on the 'dork' page.

'Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism.'

The stereotype description is inaccurate, that is why I removed it. I would say that there isn't a visual stereotype for a dork, that it is more in the way the person acts.

Thanks, ThePotsy 01:05, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to undermine you PPG, I removed that template in the spirit of not biting the new users and WP:VANDAL#What_vandalism_is_not|what vandalism is not. This is a common error when fighting vandalism and I have made the same mistake myself. If you disagree I am ready to listen. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 01:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Don't worry I misread the content from a previous copy on Dork. It was a mistake during RC Patrol.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:17, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

I see, an honest mistake, no problem. HighInBC (Need help? Ask me) 01:18, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Whoops!

I guess we both reverted the Gaara page at the same time, sorry about that. Alexforcefive 02:44, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

barnstar

Thanks for the barnstar! I'll move it to my user page. -- Rick Block (talk) 04:27, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

User:Andrew Winston

Persian Poet Gal, Is it a form of vandalism to edit your own page? I have been editing mine and User:Warthog Demon has warned me twice about it. I don't understand what I am doing wrong. Can you help me?—Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Winston (talk • contribs)

  • Warthog is not an admin, only admins can issue blocks, users however can leave warnings that alerts suspected vandalizers of their rule breaking. Here is what you can do to help: try to sign in while editing your user page. Also, you may want to drop a note on Warthog's talk page that you have edited your page with an anonymous IP frequently. I'm sure Warthog will understand, as I did. One last thing, don't forget to sign your comments with four tildes at the end (~~~~) to properly sign and date your entries.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 06:04, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Persian Poet Gal, Thank you for helping me. I appreciate it, I would like to know how you became a vandalism patroller, i am thinking of trying to become one. PS: I don't know where Warthog's talk page is. Thanks, User:Andrew WinstonAndrew Winston 07:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Persian Poet Gal, I have now contacted warthog demon. Thank you for the address. If he does not understand my situation, would it be possible for you to try to contact him?

Thanks, User:Andrew Winston Andrew Winston 06:06, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Your userpage

Your page looks great! However, in the context that it's in, shouldn't Iranian link to Iranian peoples? --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 21:35, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

Our "squeaky" friend

Indefblocked :) Did you see how he tagged his userpages??? Odd  Glen  00:40, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks. This user was blocked indefinitely yesterday, User:The hobgoblin, and then unleashed some nasty socks, all began at bTalk:Mulatto, and has resurfaced as User:PinkDragon, SqueakBox 00:55, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

(from 41.241.94.130)

as I was stil editing ............ exactly how did you determine I was a vandal???????????????

are you psychic .......... can you show me how to be as well ???

pretty please do—Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.241.94.130 (talk • contribs)

Report this cretin to AIV, stat. --ElaragirlTalk|Count 16:47, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Barnstar for all your hard work. Natasha 17:28, 1 December 2006 (UTC)


Vandalism TJ Spyke

I was not meant to do the vandalism that I did. Can you revert my warning? 86.20.53.195 17:36, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

I saw

And Administrator 1 2 4 6 or whatever. Im ASF with that last one. Hes with AOL so hard to stop  Glen  20:50, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Sockpuppet questions

Hi, I've seen you around a lot, and today I noticed that you tagged User:HAPPINESS 1 2 3 6 as a suspected sockpuppet. It seems you're experience in this area, so I'm hoping you might have some advice:

The article Bryan Brandenburg has been nom'd for AfD at Brandenburg AfD. Due to disruptive edits on these pages, I suspect that Stanlys212 (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) is a mask for either Bryan B himself, or one of his "disciples". The contrib history is brief, and the disruptive edits fairly obvious.
Similarly, WatchedHim (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) and Smurf noodle (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) have been named as suspected sockpuppets by other involved editors; their Contribs are even briefer.
The edits they have all made, and the sophistication about WP practices and policies that they show make it fairly obvious that these are not newcomers by any means.
At the AfD, I added a tag under Stanlys212's comment, indicating that he had made few or no other contribs (zero actually) prior to this discussion. In retaliation, he has added nonsense posts regarding the nominator (who is somewhat new, but a very conscientous good-faith editor). Heh! And I just got a new bit of rubbish from him on my talkpage, while I was typing this to you. This situation seems to be an abuse of the AfD process and any number of policies. Can you advise me on how best to proceed? Thanks in advance for your time! Doc Tropics 21:39, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
You mean you're not an admin?!? Huh, I just assumed...
Thanks for the advice, I'll see what I can do. Doc Tropics 21:49, 1 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Added this to his talk page: Also one last thing, if you ever feel high suspicions of sockpuppetry you can tag their page with this template: {{sockpuppet|name of user that is using the account as a sockpuppet}}. If you ever need to make a case file regarding the sockpuppetry get back to me on that and I'll walk you through it, but first check with admin on this. Hope this helps.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 21:53, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Just a Hello...

Thanks for the message. Hello to you, too! Your userpage looks great. I think you would make a great admin. --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 22:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Heh, I'm tried to make at least one or two more articles of mine more sizable than stub quality. Unfortunately I'm still mostly a stub-work creator. As far as my images however, I greatly appreciate the compliment ^_^. It took hours to make 'em myself in photoshop especially when I do not own a computer graphic pen or stylus :P...I had to erase practically millions of times...¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:33, 1 December 2006 (UTC)

for contributing

The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
For your literally tireless contributions, the encyclopedia is much better because of you! Good job! —¡Randfan! 00:00, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
You are quite welcome, and you got it beause you deserve(d) it. Good, good job! —¡Randfan! 00:04, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

That's racist!

[1] Anomo 01:38, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Heh indeed, I had no idea such a report was submitted. People with vendettas will do anything sheesh :P. Anyways, I absolutely believe in the value Wikipedia's policy about no personal attacks, his accusations about you were totally unfounded.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 02:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

(from Lantoka)

I must say, Persian Poet Gal, having your talk page on my Watchlist is quite the experience. I have never seen so many inane comments by trolls in once place in my life. Reading these comments is like sticking my brains into an industrial meat grinder; when it all comes out, I only end up dumber.
Guess that means you're doing a good job of vandal fighting though. My congratulations, and my sympathies for the abuse your talk page takes. Let me know how those 'SC applications go! =) —Lantoka ( talk | contrib) 02:42, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Thanks I appreciate the sympathy :P. As far as SC I definitely will let you know on the results, at the moment I'm trying to finalize everything before December 10th so I do not miss their freshman scholarship deadline.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 03:17, 2 December 2006 (UTC)

?

I haven't been blocked. So..Im assuming I can use this name?Hi,MyNameIsMikeAndILiveAt6525MarkLutherHwyInWaukegan 04:00, 3 December 2006 (UTC) Just to be safe, I'll wait.

So far, no block. (Since I can edit your page). However maybe I should wait 3-5 weeks before contributing, just in case.Hi,MyNameIsMikeAndILiveAt6525MarkLutherHwyInWaukegan 04:07, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

-- The username was later blocked.

There, changed it.

As you can see, I have a sense of humor.Hi,MyNameIsMikeAndI'mNotTellingYouMyAddress 04:13, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

-- The username was later blocked.

Thank you

Hi, thanks for supporting me with my RfA and the note you left for me. I've got lots to read before I try out this shiny new mop, but it looks pretty nifty. Thanks again! =) -- Gogo Dodo 06:08, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism Templates

LOL, I am putting down the templates from memory. Thanks for your help! Bearly541 07:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Apologetic

Well, I suppose you can't be faulted for excessive civility. I just thought you might leave the incorrect impression that we were somehow ashamed of having that as the front page article's subject. In reality, the history of eroticism is immensely interesting to the fields of archaeology, anthropology, and sociology. It's a far more meritous topic for the front page than some band or game species. (I'm no anti-pop culture editor either, as you probably noticed in my contributions.)

Thanks for the barnstar by the way. Not sure I deserve it, but if you say so. :) --tjstrf talk 08:34, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Personal Attack?

I left my message for Jimbo Wale, not you. Please don't erase my comments on Jimbo Wale's talk page. I didn't attack User:Khoikhoi in any way. All S/he needs to do is to explain why s/he choose Khoikhoi as his/her user name. You can see from the Khoikhoi article that his/her user name definitely has a racism concern. Even if S/he is a Khoikhoi, his/her user name is still inappropriate. NKH 17:22, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

[if I could butt in] But the word isn't even deragatory. By that reasoning, no one can have any mention of race in their username. Which means, that, oh, say, Persian Poet Gal is out of line for her username. -Patstuart(talk)(contribs) 17:40, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

NKH, it still is considered unfounded to view the intention as racist. In my opinion I do not consider the name as offensive and I myself have a username which mentions ethnicity. Why not ask the question about Khoikhoi's name to Khoikhoi directly rather than leaving a message on Jimbo's talk page?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:11, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry to butt in as well but I dont see anything wrong with your user name Persian Poet Gal. I think its really unique =) MetsFan76 23:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC) (Sorry..forgot to sign)
  • No problem, I appreciate the comment. I'm simply explaining that Wikipedia policy does not ban use of ethnicity in usernames but does ban use of usernames which contain cultural religious figures or racial slurs.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:19, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Hey Persian Poet Gal. Thanks for your reply to NKH, I was somewhat impressed. I also left a message on his talk page. I don't mind being called a racist—it's not as bad as being a suspected agent of Greek National Intelligence Service and schizophrenic web vandal unacceptible to wikipedian community. ;-) Khoikhoi 04:04, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Re. A Neologism DB-Nonsense Article

Thank you for telling me about this, Persian Poet Gal. I deleted the article. Despite it was in the borderline of G1 (nonsense), it flagrantly fell under G10 (attack page). Regards.--Húsönd 02:24, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Not to worry. :-) --Húsönd 02:27, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

About my Village Pump discussion on Barnstar policy

I recently replied to the chargest leveled against me. Not sure if the discussion is dead, but I'm trying to set the record straight. Anyway, it can be found at [[2]]. Sharkface217 04:11, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

  • I actually regard that as very responsible of you to realize what might have hindered the spirit of distributing the stars. I honestly contributed what I felt about the matter and seems like it has mostly been discussed.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Hm

pardon? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 193.151.48.83 (talk • contribs) 08:14, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

(from Jimfbleak)

Thanks. jimfbleak 08:29, 4 December 2006 (UTC)

Yet another spoofer

Can I get added to the list of spoofers? Please? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Persian Poet Ghoul (talk • contribs) 08:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

Removal Of Ambiguous Words

This comment has absolutely nothing to do with ambiguous words. Tree. I'm happy to see you're all disagreeing with each other in polite tones. =)') Anyways, Nice template, and farewell! —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 195.194.152.3 (talk • contribs) 10:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC).

yw

You're welcome! btw, you're a good RC-patroller. Cheers, Antandrus (talk) 04:02, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 4th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 49 4 December 2006 About the Signpost
Arbitration Committee elections open The Seigenthaler incident: One year later
Wikimedia celebrates Commons milestone, plans fundraiser Wikipedia wins award in one country, reported blocked in another
News and notes: Steward elections continue, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:48, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Meow

meow meow... —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.32.160.159 (talk) 05:55, 5 December 2006 (UTC).


I feel loved

Thanks for reverting my user page three times to remove vandalistic edits! --Porqin 07:04, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Hi

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Because it's ridiculous that you don't have one already. NinaEliza 07:16, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Dang it, edit conflict. I've had you on my watchlist since you reverted a piece of vandalism on Jimbo Wales talk page. I notice that you do a lot of vandal reversion, perhaps to the detriment of editing things you might like to.

The only reason I've never awarded you a barnstar before is simply because I didn't know I could. I've also been involved in some very unfortunate situations that have made more wary than I would be otherwise.

I want you to know that I've always enjoyed your comments, your humor, and your user page. I also like your cat:). In any event, thank you.NinaEliza 07:23, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

My shiny new star!

Aww, thank you! It' my first one! :D delldot | talk 13:39, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thanks for replying about my sig, and sorry about the USC trojans loss. :(. Cheers! — Seadog (Talk) 19:11, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Also sorry to bother again, but you appear to have a userbox with a copyrighted image (The USC one). I do not know if you know but fair use images are sadly not allowed in userboxes. :(. Just trying to save you from future warnings. Cheers. — Seadog (Talk) 19:18, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
As you say No problem! Cheers. — Seadog (Talk)

Blocking

Hello! I've been exercising my new admin abilities (thanks for commenting on my RfA, by the way) and I usernameblocked the person you reported. It seems that AIV is patrolled too quickly for me to keep up with, and by the time I'm about to do anything besides a usernameblock, it's already been done! :0 Thank you for your services to Wikipedia, and your wonderful civility that makes you great to be around. --Gray PorpoiseYour wish is my command! 22:35, 5 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting vandalism to my user page Persian Poet Gal. I blocked him for vandalism + personal attacks. Keep up the great work. :-) Kindest regards,--Húsönd 01:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

(from 70.251.115.171)

ok sorry about that70.251.115.171 02:45, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

(from 71.98.20.146)

awww. vandalism is fun... :( come on PPG, you had to have been against some form of authority as a child! if you aren't a child now. but hey, what am i doing here on the internet, might as well go vandalize the white house and paint it red or something. peace out yo.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.98.20.146 (talk • contribs)

you're rainin' on my parade here sister! nah, i was pretty much kidding, i have plenty of hobbies... like... crying myself to sleep. haha. are you paid for this?—Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.98.20.146 (talk • contribs)

Back off man.....MetsFan76 05:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Do roses grow this time of the year? :) MetsFan76 05:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you so much for my first barnstar! That made my night:) --phenzTalk 06:17, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Incorrect vandalism warning

http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Loma_Linda_University_Medical_Center&diff=92395821&oldid=92394809 This] revert should not have been labelled as vandalism, and the editor should not have been labelled as a vandal or "warned" for it. Although the statement was incorrect, there was no direct evidence that it was done in bad faith. Ansell 06:20, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Sorry, on recent changes patrol there are revert edits which can be incorrect or marked incorrectly. It was so drastically out of place that it came across as vandalism. Again my apologies if it was merely an incorrect edit.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 06:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Admittedly that edit does not look okay, however, using evidence from March, when the IP could reasonably be said to be a shared ip [3], is a little misleading. It looks like, and I am going to tag it as a shared IP educational institution editor per the IP address. Ansell 07:37, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the revert on page. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 12:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

"Thanks!" from User:Atlant

Thanks for the revert to my user page!

Atlant 12:49, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

WP:AFC

Hey, this page can get pretty backlogged sometimes. I know you do mostly vandalism stuff, but I've seen you at Help Desk sometimes. If you could help this page out, it'd be great. Thanks. -Patstuarttalk|edits 19:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

Persian Poet Gal hello,

Please reconsider excluding my links from wiki. They r indeed to a specific site but that site has articles which wikipedia's readers can find helpful & learn a lot from. Please notice that Omedia is an academic and not a commercial site – it sells nothing and doesn't even have ads in it. Please reconsider. yuval —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Yuval a (talk • contribs) 13:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

  • Hello Yuval a, the link still does not seem appropriate enough to add to the article. I appreciate you asking to reconsider respectfully but according to this edit of Lebanon administrator Nlu had reverted your addition of an omedia link. The omedia link may not meet the requirements of WP:External Links. That's the only reason why one might consider it spam to add it to articles. If you still feel that the link is appropriate, leave a message on the article talk page appealing to its editors. They have more say in reality than I do considering that the editors of the article contribute to it more largely than any recent changes patroller does. Hope this helps you.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 14:29, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for Correcting the Skip Farlow Entry

Thanks for properly formatting the entry at articles for creation. It was my first time accepting/declining an entry. Keep up the great work :).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 15:47, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Actually, what you did was fine; I got an edit conflict on that one, and mis read Persian Poet to be "Patstaurt". Patstuarttalk|edits 15:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Proposals page

Before finalising the Discussion award, shouldn't at title be chosen, or do you think Discussion award\Barnstar (obviously one of the two) is good? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Simply south (talk • contribs) 22:49, 7 December 2006 (UTC).

I was just about to sign. ;) Simply south 22:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)

Re: Db-attack article

Sorry, I thought I had already replied. I deleted the article. Thanks for bringing it to my notice. --May the Force be with you! Shreshth91 17:12, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

George W. Bush

The following entry refers to this diff which I reverted of Psdubow's. Psdubow later left a message which explained that the random spamming of the ###### symbols in replacement of words was due to a server error.

Dear Ms. Persian Poet Gal,

The "Fun" Facts I added to the George W. Bush page is not "vandalism" as you said it was.

Bush's approval rating and the War in Iraq approval rating are entirely factual and up-to-date.

Also, the "fun" fact about when someone Googles the words "Failure" or "Worst President" one of the first things that shows up under search results is Pres. Bush's biography is entirely true.

If tried multiple times from my computer and other computers. Every time I tried typing either on of those phrases it listed Pres. Bush's biography within the first ten results.

If you wish to reply, please put your reply on my talk page.

Thanks!

Sincerely,

Psdubow

I can't for the life of me figure out this user's edits. At first I thought he was a vandal, reconsidered, and am back to wondering. That's the third time he's made that same edit to George W. Bush. [4] [5] [6]. His edits also seem to blank content from other pages: [7] [8] [9]. I'm starting to wonder if he has one of those programs on his computer that parents install to block questionable content. Those last three links block out XXX, fetish, and bondage, respectively. I don't think it is intentional blanking...thoughts? AuburnPilottalk 21:40, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Looking at his most recent edit, the word "hard" appears to have been blanked out. [10] I think he must have a content blocker installed. I'm not really sure there's anything we can do to avoid this problem, though. AuburnPilottalk 21:48, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Yeah, I tried to revert it and my computer is now screwing with me...sorry about that. AuburnPilottalk 21:58, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Fine, Sorry

I apologize.—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.94.122.64 (talk • contribs)

Edits

Dear Administrators,

It is a server error.

I even asked a more computer savy user and friend to help me and explain to me what is happening to me when I am trying to edit.

It has already happen to me on the Pres. Bush page, the Dr. James McCune Smith page, and others. It has also happened to other users too.

I am trying to edit stuff, but it keeps on doing this ("######") on some words. They are not offensive words! For instance, some of the words were hard, freedom, security, etc.

I am not trying to do anything wrong and I would be happy to help try and revert this server error and to fix the pages accidentally damaged by myself and others.

Sorry for any trouble I am causing you guys!

Thanks!


Sincerely,

Psdubow

  • Well alright, I will assume good faith and not scrutinize you for a server error. I am not an administrator, I voluntarily patrol recent changes. Please however consider testing in the sandbox for awhile before you continue to edit articles just in case.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:06, 8 December 2006 (UTC)


Thank you for giving me the benefit-of-the-doubt.

By the way, do you guys know what's causing this server error?

No offence, but I don't really need to use the "sandbox". I, for the most part, already know how to edit.

To prove it, please check out the work my friend and I did on the Dr. James McCune Smith page.

I want to be productive and add stuff to help improve important articles and articles I'm interested in.

Thanks!

Psdubow


  • I'm not mentioning the sandbox to learn how to edit, I'm saying to test in there if the error is persisting. Unfortunately I am unaware what may be causing the error but I wish the best of luck to you, and hope that the problem corrects itself or you find someone who knows how to fix it.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:19, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
Psdubow, do you know if you're using a proxy for your Web connection? ;) David Spalding ta!k y@wp/Contribs 17:09, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Please tell...

Dear Ms. Persian Poet Gal,

Can you tell your friend Auburn Pilot about this unfortunate server error ands that we have figured out the situation.

Thanks!

Psdubow


Thank you very much!

Psdubow

Bio star

I saw you created the fauna star. You may wish to know that there is already a bio star: Template:Bio-star. Samsara (talk • contribs) 01:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

AIV

Thanks for fixing AIV. I kept thinking that I removed everything accidentally, when really one of the reporrts messed up the formatting so that everything was blocked out. Academic Challenger 02:37, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

(from 24.119.29.8)

How am I spamming? Those are all legit Spider-Man sites?

BD www.spidermancrawlspace.com—Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.119.29.8 (talk • contribs)

So why is my website, which was one of the first online about Spider-Man banned from the Spider-Man entry? It gets deleted every time I try to add it.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Petroc (talk • contribs)

BD www.spidermancrawlspace.com

Seven wonders

Just wanted to say that I think you did a nice job on the USA Today/Good Morning America list of "seven wonders of the world" that you added to the Seven Wonders of the World article. Your work is clean and elegant in its simplicity, and I really like how you used a table rather than the boring lists used in other "wonders lists." Now if only we can keep things from degenerating into an edit war as people argue over what precisely the wonders should link to. --Kralizec! (talk) 18:04, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

accusations of vandalism

hello.

yo sent me a message accusing me of changing the christopher columbus page. I have never even visited that page. thanks —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 24.177.2.138 (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

EB Games article vandalsim

Hello Persian Poet Gal,

There has been some form of what I think is vandalsm on the bottom of the EB games article. Please delete it.

Thanks, Andrew Winston 22:13, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

About Raven Bishop

I have remade a edit for Raven Bishop with a different picture this time and the article with the tag that it was my work, I hope you can make this public domain for everyone to look up. My new nick's Etta85 with a new account deleted from the old. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 23:15, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

I tried to recreate to fit the standards for Wikipedia, and it was my hard work that made it with the hours I spent on it. You can delete the old one but please keep the one I redid and make it public domain.

Thank you,

Raven Bishop —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 23:25, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

Can the article and the picture about Raven Bishop that I wrote about myself be saved after all? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 23:44, 9 December 2006 (UTC).

So, what can you do to make the article saved? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 00:23, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

  • I am trying to explain to you that the person in question does not meet WP:BIO guidelines to be included. She and her work unfortunately are not notable enough to merit her a page on Wikipedia. If she does gain enough notability to meet WP:BIO guidelines then a page is completely merited.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

The biography of Raven Bishop is at poethunter.com I hope you can read it and the article on Wikipedia that I recently re-wrote. I have Mp3 lyrics and poetry about me, Raven Bishop online as well as project on Wikipedia in writing and poetry about my biography, I wrote.

Sincerely,

Raven Bishop—Preceding unsigned comment added by Etta85 (talk • contribs)

Do you have an idea to put me on Wikipedia successfully? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 05:21, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

The Right To Publish

I thought people could have the right to publish their biographies as long as they had a reliable source to them and I did.

Yours truly,

Raven Bishop —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Etta85 (talk • contribs) 05:26, 10 December 2006 (UTC).

  • Etta I understand you are an aspiring artist much like myself however at this current time you do not have the requirements to have a Wikipedia article. If your body of work becomes printed by notable publishers and your work is recognized by multiple notable independent reviews or awards then the circumstances would be otherwise. First I would suggest that you read WP:BIO to get an idea of the notability required for Wikipedia.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 05:27, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Re:Hey Noticed An Error in Your Signature

Wow! Thanks a lot! I never noticed the glitch since the signature seemed fine, though I wondered why it didn't show up green-blueish. That was nice of you ;) Parutakupiu talk || contribs 06:04, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

crossing my fingers....

Crossing my fingers for you (USC application).... — David Spalding ta!k y@wp/Contribs 16:52, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

From User:Gracenotes

I believe that you were thinking of my evil twin, User:Gracenotes ON WHEELS!!!. I apologize for any confusion of yours between him and me, and would encourage you to look out for him in the near future.

My edit was just intended to make the paragraph more in the style of ze famous Swedish Chef, with the added unapproachability of the German language. Perhaps you could tell that the paragraph was already relatively Swedish/German, and just needed a bit more børking. Ze CableModem (is ze isomophic of ze Buickid on ze IRC) wrote the paragraph in half-jest, so I attempted to improve the voice without removing or obfuscating any content.

More seriously, thanking you for having the decency and consideration to note your revert on my talk page, even though my edit was a silly one to begin with. Gracenotes T § 19:43, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh yes, its all cool. Most vandalism to my page is quite obvious, and stuff like this is always welcome. :) Come visit me @ #wikimedia-social on freenode one day! --CableModem^_^ 07:31, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my user page!  :) Wyatt Riot 00:28, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh, and I like some of your custom userboxes. I may just "borrow" a few if you don't mind....  :) Wyatt Riot 00:35, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Also thanks for reverting vandalism on my talk page. :-) Best regards.--Húsönd 01:44, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Me too. I probably would have never noticed it. -- Robert See Hear Speak 06:12, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

A collection of dangerous axes!
For the sharpest vandalfighters only! Just to make sure that you'll always have some extra tools for tackling those vandals. :-) Best regards.--Húsönd 02:06, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
IP-Vandals threaten our very Wikipedia way of life
  • Oh, I was thinking of one of these vandal invaders catching a cold and dying just before completely wiping good-hearted Wikipedians off the face of the earth. C'mon, filmgirl, get up on yo' film references.... :P Death to Videodrome, "Oh Strange One" 19:37, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Article deleted

I deleted it per CSD:A3 - empty article. Thanks for pointing it out. Gwernol 01:55, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

(from Wikidogs)

Hello!

Why Dogup.com is spam? This is a website with a lot of FREE information for dog lovers.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidogs (talk • contribs)

Hello, Why did you think about this is non-notable fansite? How do you know? Did you look aroud the website? Please let me know. The website have around 4000 pages with UNIQUE content, you can see it with copyscape.com—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidogs (talk • contribs)

Hello, You said, Wikipedia is not a repository of links, I'm VERY AGREE, I saw your entries and these links arent very strong, but dont worry, only TWO editors (you and another one) said that the website is not relevant (TWO editors in Thousands). For example your entries about movies arent notable for me, and I could delete your entries, but maybe for another editors are notable, what do you think? Please just for know, how do you check if a website is relevant or not? Thanks very much to talk with me :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidogs (talk • contribs)

  • Sure no problem, but understand that the reason why this may also be not included is because the addition of this link is as if the article promotes that website. Wikipedia is not made up of advert links which do not add on relevantly to the article. For example, the Food article on Wikipedia includes a few links to websites which are notable and relevant to the article. Notice however that it does not include other popular websites like Epicurious.com whose Alexa rank is way higher than Dogup.com's Alexa rank. Hope this helps.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 03:08, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello! :) Look at Dog Food, there are link http://www.aplus-flint-river-ranch.com/faqs-pet-food-nutrition.php, Dog up alexa rank is better than aplus-flint-river.... and the domain looks like spammy, right? If you see at Dog Up, this have free information, about dog breeds, dog names, dog photos, dog supplies, is more relevant, this is my opinion maybe no for you, if you browse Dog up, your learn about dogs, learn about dog names, etc. I think you should approve Dog up, this is my opinion, there are many link in Wiki (I have used Wiki for year, also I have donated money, etc) with Alexa 1500000 or more.

PS: As you can see I am not a spammer, I am sharing a nice resouce about dogs. Best regards :)—Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikidogs (talk • contribs)

  • I again appreciate your very polite approach but even that link is suscetible to being considered inappropriate. I think just avoid adding the Dogup.com link for now. As a editer it is generally encouraged to avoid link only contributions. I'm sure you will add on to articles with very good information in the future rather than just links. Regards,¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 04:38, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for awarding me with a barnstar! I didn't expect that. --Neigel von Teighen 13:40, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Paternity Party

Hi, I saw you flagged my entry for speedy deletion. This is my first time posting, so sorry if I screwed up!

I'm not sure what I did wrong. This is a movie in development and I wanted to include it on the site. I put in links to the production and management companies. Is there anything else I should add?

Thanks!

/alex grossman

user: Agrossman—Preceding unsigned comment added by Agrossman (talk • contribs)

  • No worries there was nothing drastically wrong with it. The production did not seem notable enough and therefore was speedily deleted (see WP:N). There was a user who tried to redirect to a main article but there was no such article in existence.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 16:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Discussion Award closure near

Things have been going well and then stopped for a while. Therefore i am closeing the proposal nearly.

"Thank you for voting orginally and the additional comments. I have posted on the proposals page a closing subsection with a couple of minor issues. I would apreciate comment. The issues are title and image. See the Wikipedia:Barnstar and award proposals/New Proposals#Closing discussion."

I have put this in quote marks as i have put only slightly altered messages on those who have participated. Please review the award. Simply south 22:58, 11 December 2006 (UTC)

Signpost updated for December 11th.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery


Volume 2, Issue 50 11 December 2006 About the Signpost
From the editor: New feature
Board of Trustees expanded as three new members are appointed Wikimedia Foundation releases financial audit
Arbitration Committee elections continue, extra seat available Female-only wiki mailing list draws fire
Trolling organization's article deleted WikiWorld comic: "Redshirt"
News and notes: Fundraiser plans, milestones Wikipedia in the News
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Report on Lengthy Litigation
Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Article in need of cleanup - please assist if you can

The article Argentina, to which you have helped contribute, has been flagged as requiring cleanup.

If possible, we would appreciate your assistance in cleaning up this article to bring it up to Wikipedia's quality standards. If you are unsure what the nature of the problem is, please discuss this on the article's talk page.
You have been left this message by PocKleanBot, an automated process that notifies editors that articles to which they may have contributed on more than one occasion in the past now need cleanup. If you have any comments or object to this message being left, please leave a message on PocKleanBot's talk page.

(from Hotdiggedy dog)

Thanks...I will be talking to you as I get questions...Thanks again...Hotdiggedy dog 22:24, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

  • No problem, just felt I ought to inform you before they end up removing your name for having to few mainspace edits. Don't worry, eventually if you keep a good track record (no bans, edit wars, warnings, etc.) and gain 250 mainspace edits they will be more than happy to approve you ;).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:26, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Beautiful

I have read your poetry and I find them wonderful. — Seadog 02:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

I am glad you have provided them :). — Seadog 02:13, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
It's so good to see someone else who has the most vandalized pages in their watchlist as well! Whenever I have to go somewhere, and I don’t have the time to fix that little bit of vandalism on the “Banana” or the “Hilary Duff” page, I can always count on seeing your name there reverting the next time I log on. Although we’ve never met before, but I feel that you definitely deserve this Anti-Vandalism Barnstar fully! Awesome work! lovelaughterlife♥talk? 03:08, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thank you for the barnstar! Glad to see you got one tonight too. --PresN 04:48, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Sorry... but

This message was left in reference for an image change on the Xbox 360 article.

There was previously an innapropriate image of Semen and I wanted to change it as soon as possible... so I didn't care wether or not it was right... I jusyt wanted to get that picture replaced...—Preceding unsigned comment added by Meph1sto (talk • contribs)

RFA?

Hey Persian Poet Gal, I have seen you everywhere and I think that you would be a great Phenomenal administrator! You are kind and civil you know what you are doing and you have been around for a while. Would you mind if I nominate you, it would be an honor. Please let me know. Cheers. — Seadog 23:21, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Seadog that is immeasurably kind of you! Others have approached me about it and I am really honored however I think it would be best if we give it a few more months. I most graciously accept if the Wikipedia community feels that I would be eligible enough to be an admin but per some advice I recieved from Husond, he wanted to submit an RfA by January or February due to my becoming really active in the community since October of this year (even though I created this account in 2005). However if you or anyone else feels that they would like to nominate me, I will accept based on their beliefs in my abilities.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 23:29, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

User:Pooper Scooper 007

Blocked, thanks for the heads-up. NawlinWiki 04:44, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The Argentina Bit

Not a problem! Yes, a stunning vocabulary indeed. Also nabbed a bit of vandalism he/she performed on what I surmise to be his/her school yesterday (seeing as the person's edit log reveals edits to that school's page dating back over one year). Anyway, you're perfectly welcome :). Ginsengbomb 19:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

oh thanks.

hey thanks for telling me. i meant to hav it as abrevaition for popcorn . sory. me english not to good. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ilove porn (talk • contribs) 19:48, 14 December 2006 (UTC).

You're welcome

...but of course! It's nice of you to have put such a pleasant spot on Wikipedia. Thanks for the star.  :) Antandrus (talk) 20:28, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

Quickly

I'd just like to say that what I posted on the talk page was not very personal at all, but it was fact. People are completely ignorant and biased when it comes to subcultures and I was just pointing out that they were completely wrong and ignorant. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Die Interviewer (talk • contribs) 00:14, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

  • Yes but realize that an article talk page is for discussing changes to an article. Also if you noticed I removed the other topics which were posted inappropriately that were direct attacks on the subject of the article, so it was not only in regards to yourself.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:17, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

For reverting vandalism to my user page. I appreciate it. --Guinnog 00:19, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I wondered at that myself. Also, I am around 8000 miles from Scotland at the moment. Ah well. --Guinnog 00:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Fast editing, thanks for that. + Ceoil 00:26, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ecotec Vandalism

Hey, just saw your message. Sorry about that, I haven't done much wiki editing so I didn't realize the user page and the user talk page were separate. Thanks for the clarification. Promit 01:18, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

(from 60.228.88.163)

Hi I noticed that you rejected my Iraq submission - I actually agree with your comments. However I do think there is value in my general idea. How about a compilation page with all the alternative strategies that have ever been suggested, listing all of them and analysing their various merits? Richard Davis Brisbane Australia—Preceding unsigned comment added by 60.228.88.163 (talk • contribs)

  • Thank you for approaching very politely but as I said that kind of information does not merit its own article. If you honestly are interested in adding that information post your request on the Talk:Iraq War page and ask other editors about how they feel adding the edit to the main article.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:27, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Expert Pathologist

I am not runnin g a spam I am a physician referring ptients with cancer diagnosis to a website that offers second opinion and confirm their pathology cancer diagnosis. Also offers free consultation by asking a physician pathologist about your diagnosis by filling the "FeedBack" form. Try the website. it is not a spam. Please dont remove —The preceding unsigned comment was added by ExpertPathologist (talk • contribs) 01:40, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

But he sounds so... expert. (snickers) --ElaragirlTalk|Count 03:09, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

o'reilly

Sorry, I didn't mean to waste your time. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 71.192.246.130 (talk) 02:00, 15 December 2006 (UTC).

Your FAQ

The FAQ on your userpage is more helpful than anything else I've seen on Wikipedia. Please don't think me too familiar, but you rock.NinaEliza (talk • contribs • count • logs • email) 03:03, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Ne-Yo

Hey! My name's Mickel (guinea_to_the_pig@hotmail.com) Umm, Yeah, I saw you wrote a comment to the person who vandalized the In My Own Words page, and I see that they also made a new album for Ne-Yo. Who is this person? Cause they're stupid Love Mickel :)

P.S: Add me on MSN—Preceding unsigned comment added by Mickel The Vain (talk • contribs)

  • There is no way of really knowing who the vandalizer was but if I remember correctly they did so under an account name rather than an anonymous IP. I'm not one to throw around names but I agree that the act of vandalizing is non-to-smart :P. Unfortunately I'm not one for instant messengers however if you want to contact me you can always drop a message here.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:35, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Edits and etc..

This IP address recently made some edits to the Benedict Arnold and Tiger articles, which were renounced as vandalism. I don't know if you can do anything about this, or if I'm even doing this the wrong way, but I just want you to know that this particular IP address belongs to the George West Independent School district, so it's public and any of the students could be editing articles, so you might want to block this IP from editing articles, anyway.

Thanks.

208.68.153.65 17:25, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • I am not an administrator, so I am not the one to come to enact a block. However it is very good that you brought that your IP is a shared one. I will try to help by tagging your IP talk page with the "This is a School IP" tag. That should assist administrators when they are examining suspicious edits by your IP address.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 17:37, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

(from Juliachill13)

Hi - just got your message about deleting the Sandlot Games posting. I tried to follow BigFish Games format to ensure that it wasn't like an advertisement.

Can you tell me what I could remove to get the entry posted?

Thanks, Julia

julia@sandlotgames.com—Preceding unsigned comment added by Juliachill13 (talk • contribs)

  • Hello Julia, that article that you were using as reference itself requires some recalibration and cleanup, I have tagged that article with a cleanup tag after you alerted me to it (also check the talk page which discusses Neutral Point of View concerns: Talk:Big Fish Games. As far as your own article it strikes as blatant advertising because it mainly consists of external links to your companies games rather than sufficient content. Also the wordage strikes as very much as a point-of-view, Wikipedia is a Neutral Point of View encyclopedia, meaning that passages like "Sandlot Games boasts a captivating portfolio..." indicate language that is not neutral enough. Please consider taking out the bulk of the links in the article and write content which describes the company without point-of-view adages. Regards,¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 19:57, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Willy riding on his rims

LOL, that one is a couple of wheels short of a bicycle. He appears to have stopped trolling for now ... (am I bad if I admit I laugh at these sometimes?) ... :) Antandrus (talk) 22:30, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Your RfA

Hello again Persian Poet Gal. As you can see here, I've listed you on my subpage about RfAs. I was wondering if you would be interested in attempting an RfA in the beginning of February 2007, possibly the 1st of Feb. You are such a prodigal user and I see your name all the time, I can't avoid feeling eager for the adminship that you most deserve. :-) Best regards.--Húsönd 22:34, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Your huge confidence in my abilities truly humbles me Husond. As long as you agree that we give it some time, seeing as Seadog approached me yesterday about the matter, I am receptive to accepting a nomination by February as you have suggested now and in the past. I really thank you for your kindness and regardless of being an administrator, I love Wikipedia with or without a mop :).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 22:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Hurray! :-) No need to feel humbled, appraisal comes naturally when one's doing a superb job such as yours. Ok, I shall make a preliminary schedule to Feb 1, 2007. It's gonna be great. :-) Regards.--Húsönd 22:46, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for letting me know. I protected one of the pages he had been recreating, and I also blocked the user for 24 hours. =) Nishkid64 23:06, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

And best of luck with USC. I hear from Johns Hopkins on Monday lol. =) Nishkid64 23:07, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in Homosexuality. Wikipedia is not a mere directory of links nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that exist to attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam policies for further explanations of links that are considered appropriate. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. ¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:07, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Warnings

How do you give a warning to someone who appears to be vandalising a page? I wish to know because I may have a problematic situation.

From Andrew Winston 00:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Look on my user page at the section which is marked "How-To" Guide to Wikipedia and scroll down to the "what to do if you see vandalism" question. It gives you all the details you need to know ;) (do not forget to click the link about how to revert, its wikified directly to the page).¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 00:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Persian Poet Gal, If in an article people's names are mentioned, does the author need to seek permission if they do not want their names on the page? Andrew Winston 01:09, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

  • Hmmm I don't quite understand your question. If a person mentioned in the article does not want their name included in its content I guess they could request this on the article talk page. Could you elaborate your question more please?¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

What I meant if the person did not want their name on the article and it remains could it be construed as a form of vandalism?Andrew Winston 01:42, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

  • If the name was added as an inappropriate edit anyone can revert the edit or remove the name. As far as a name being included unwantingly in an article it is not considered a vandalism issue but something else entirely. The person would have to go through other measures such as requesting on Talk pages or more seriously from the Wikipedia corporation I guess.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 01:55, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Ok thanks. I just had a small issue with a page, and I think i'll be able to manage it. If I cannot, I will contact you again.Concerned Dude 02:00, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Hello once again, Sorry to come back, but I have one more question to ask. If a user uses someone's name and it seems like they are personally attacking them, what can you do? If you can do something, are there any specific people who might be able to help? Andrew Winston 02:13, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

  • You can issue them a personal attack warning, such as: {{subst:npa}} {{subst:npa2}} {{subst:npa3}} {{subst:npa4}}. However in this case, after looking at the user page of the user whom you contacted, I see how it derives some personal attacks on yourself. I strongly recommend in this case that you contact an administrator (admin Can't sleep, clown will eat me is on at the moment) and politely specify how the user is personally attacking you on their userpage. The admin could delete the page if a block is not exactly the best way to handle it.¤~Persian Poet Gal (talk) 02:22, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Do I need to tell you who the person is? Or do you already know? and does user:andrew winston attack anyone?Andrew Winston 02:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Uh, i'm a little confused, I can't see anywhere on clown will eat me's page where i can make a complaint!

Thank you very much. I have spoken to him and am waiting a reply.Andrew Winston 02:51, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Rawr!

You beat me to the db-nonsense by two seconds on "Fine Piece of Meat!" RAWR I say to thee. :P Pumeleon 01:26, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Heh...

...always looking out for me, I see. hugs --ElaragirlTalk|Count 02:38, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Persian_Poet_Gal/Archive2&oldid=1199065802"