User talk:Perogrimadi

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nigma Talib, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Nigma Talib. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Perogrimadi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Nigma Talib, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Delta13C (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delta13C, there is no COI with the context. I am discussing details now on the page.Perogrimadi (talk) 13:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Perogrimadi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Perogrimadi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Samwalton9 (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help needed

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Although I am a newbie on Wikipedia, I can clearly find User:Delta13C is overtagging a page Nigma Talib knowingly, even there are no such issues, Can someone check his contributions. He seems to be linked with Michael Uzick, check his contribution at Draft:Michael Uzick and attacking the page with a biasness.(refer to the talk page) Please help me to understand if I need to know under Wikipedia editing policies.Perogrimadi (talk) 19:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

User:Samwalton9

I have removed the tags on Nigma Talib. We're supposed to always assume good faith, but Delta13C seems to be trying to start an WP:Edit war and create problems by indiscriminately tagging for issues that are not present. White Arabian mare (Neigh) 20:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If the talk page discussion doesn't suffice, my suggestion would be to pursue dispute resolution. Huon (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Neigh, please check the edit history of the article. I was not indiscriminately tagging, but was restoring tags that were removed from bold action by Perogrimadi. Most of my edits to Talib Nigma were tagging ref-needed and flagging unreliable sources. Delta13C (talk) 10:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback

Hello, Perogrimadi. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.

Orphaned non-free image File:Callminer logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Callminer logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of AccessiBe

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on AccessiBe, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:57, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

October 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. MER-C 10:03, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]