User talk:Pentachlorphenol

Wikipedia:Babel

de

Dieser Benutzer spricht Deutsch als Muttersprache.

en-3

This user can contribute with an advanced level of English.

fr-1

Cet utilisateur peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.

Search user languages

Please contact me at: Pentachlorphenol de.wiki. Thank You.

Three-revert rule

I assume you are familiar with WP:3RR on en.wiki. If not, please take a read through it. Your edits to International Civil Aviation Organization do not qualify for an exception. —C.Fred (talk) 20:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: I am familiar with this rule but I do not know if you also have the exception: ...to revert clear vandalism... block evasion is vandalism. Spreading his specific pov also. But if you prefer, I will leave him to you and I hope, you have fun with him. He went to the arbcom at de-wiki, his claims were rejected. Today he continued spreading his pov and was blocked. Then he came over to you.

I have a different view of wikipedia. I think it is one project with many languages and with many different rules in each version. --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 20:10, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Three revert rule

Greetings Pentachlorphenol. I see that you are a frequent and respected contributor at German Wikipedia, and drop by English Wikipedia from time to time. Welcome back!

I noticed that you are engaged in a content dispute with Peterpens at the article International Civil Aviation Organization. If you weren't already aware of this, English Wikipedia has something called the three revert rule. It states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. I'm not sure if German Wikipedia has a similar rule.

I'm sure you can appreciate why we want editors to follow the proper dispute resolution process, whether they are newcomers or experienced users like yourself. Thanks. --Drm310 🍁 (talk) 20:05, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]