Jump to content

User talk:Pengowl

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome

[edit]

Hello, Pengowl, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement.

Ser Amantio di Nicolao

Happy editing! Ser Amantio di NicolaoChe dicono a Signa?Lo dicono a Signa. 17:20, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

Your recent edits

[edit]

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 02:00, 24 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Pengowl, Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia :) You recently modified the article Trance music, updating references. What was your primary intention, and can we help you at clearing those notes? There are now numbers in "sup" near to note calls, a bit confusing - I did not remove them since I suppose they are still under work, am I right? Teuxe (talk) 12:00, 28 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Teuxe! I hope you're well! My intention in updating references was to make the article more rigorous & more defensible & make editing more objective. About the "sup"s, they indicate the page numbers, and weren't my idea. I had previously put page numbers in the references section, but someone made a bunch of edits and put the page numbers referenced in the sups. I assumed that this was the proper way to indicate page numbers, and so when updating references I put the pages numbers in the sups. I assume there is a better way to do this, if only in the references at the bottom listing all page numbers referenced. What do you recommend? Thanks! Pengowl (talk) 20:23, 1 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

February 2012

[edit]

I don't understand your comments on Trance music. Danceking05 was blocked in May, though to all of Wikipedia, not just one article. But that block is past, and xe isn't being disruptive now. Second, no one can do an edit that someone else can't undo, so if there's something you think needs to be changed back, you can do that. Third, I don't see any place where he removed information--he moved some around, and he marked some as needing citations, but no major removals.

Ultimately, if you have concerns, please bring them to Talk: Trance music rather than just trying to cram everything into a short edit summary. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:54, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I just got your email, and skimmed it, but it's way too much for me to read. As I said above, you can undo any edit he made, and his editing style is actually quite normal: I almost always make a number of small changes instead of large ones, since it's actually easier to see each individual change. Even if you can't hit "undo", the changes were very small and you could re-edit them by hand.
Ah, I had to go back to earlier in the month to see the removals. If you look at the history, you'll see that I agreed with them. That article had massive chunks of text that were unsourced, much of it mark that way for a very long time. WP:V says that unsourced text needs to be removed from articles.
As for his bad behavior on talk, yes, he has acted badly there. Then again, so have those who've opposed his changes. And his recent discussion on talk was quite polite.
So, I still really don't know what's wrong with what he did. Maybe you're right, and some portion of what he removed was covered by a source. If that's the case, do what we're all supposed to do: hit the edit button, and re-add the information with a source right next to it.
I don't see any cause for Dk5 to be blocked. I see an editor working (mostly) within policy to clean up a lot of unsourced material. Qwyrxian (talk) 22:07, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
And I know zilch about the topic, and don't see how I can help, sorry. Dougweller (talk) 19:23, 3 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


Teahouse logo
Hello! Pengowl, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A State of Trance Future Favorites, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Pengowl. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "A State of Trance Future Favorites".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by one of two methods (don't do both): 1) follow the instructions at WP:REFUND/G13, or 2) copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/A State of Trance Future Favorites}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, and click "Save page". An administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:23, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]