User talk:Pending

Test Edit to ensure connection! Simple English: Pending (talk)

Simple English: Pending, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Simple English: Pending! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Theopolisme (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 20:41, 7 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Pending. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by PrimeHunter (talk) 00:20, 9 January 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template.[reply]

Help request

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Is there a special permission needed to create an article that starts with Wikipedia: ? I want to add one to the simple English Wikipedia, but I am not sure if I need to get permission from an admin. (I am a trusted user on the Simple English, with rollback and patroller rights) Pending ^{(tell me I screwed up}

Each Wikipedia is separate and has its own rules and policies, so you really need to ask that question on Simple.

Here on the English Wikipedia, the prefix "Wikipedia" is used only for pages to do with the working of the site, policy pages such as Wikipedia:Verifiability and notice-boards like Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion. I am not familiar with Simple English Wikipedia, but pages like simple:Wikipedia:Manual of Style suggest that that is their practice, too. If you are proposing a new policy page on Simple, I would advise proposing it first on whatever is their equivalent of Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) to see whether others agree. JohnCD (talk) 19:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I sorted it outPending ^{(tell me I screwed up}

A barnstar for you!

	The Barnstar of Good Humor
	Thanks for signing my guestbook! Jianhui67^{talk★contribs} 13:15, 22 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 14:17, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 16:19, Thursday, December 19, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Talkback

Hello, Pending. You have new messages at LukeSurl's talk page.
Message added 17:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

LukeSurl^{t c} 17:20, 23 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

How is my Entry a Neologism?

Please give me more info on exaclty what this means...and how the article I submitted is such a thing? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MickGinger (talk • contribs) 02:49, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The article did not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. I suggest you read what they are and attempt to fix your article by finding things that make your article notable. This is why the article was declined. -Pending ^{Tell me I screwed up!} 13:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, but I have read them, and followed all of the guidelines. However, the reason was that this was a Neologism? This is incorrect...How much more notable is Time Magazine? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.83.254.2 (talk) 17:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

−

Let me read the article again. If you wish I will edit some stuff in your article, and make it acceptable.Pending ^{Tell me I screwed up!} 17:17, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. I meant to tag it for notability. I see why you were asking that. Accepted. -Pending ^{Tell me I screwed up!} 17:22, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article on Hou De Kharcha

Can you please advise me what needs to change to make this article accepted? I think I have given all the legit article references from newspaper. Given its internet meme and in Marathi language - It's has not made to lot of english newspapers but i have given all references to marathi newspaper. Also the first reviewer whom i worked with had mentioned this article is a candidate for Did you know and now i m having problem to get it accepted. The first reviewer and me worked and put lot of structure and was finalized. Can you please help me or tell me that its never going to be accepted? Coolflip9 (talk) 22:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I would be glad too help you. Let me make some edits to the page and see if it meets the requirements thereafter. -Pending ^{Tell me I screwed up!}

Alright because I have not a slightest clue about the topic of the article, I could not change anything. Fortunately for you though, I have reviewed the minimal requirements for such an article and it just barely gets by. I will tell you this. I will accept the article, but please note that I cannot stop it from getting deleted if other people do not believe it is notable. -Pending ^{Tell me I screwed up!} 23:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, I think its notable and is a fad among Marathi speaking population. It's used in Marathi movies and google image search will lead you thousands of examples of meme. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coolflip9 (talk • contribs) 00:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Height

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Height. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:09, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 24 January

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the SGH Martineau LLP page, your edit caused a URL error (help) and a wikilink error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Article included numerous references

Article submitted regarding Movable Ink was rejected by you for "lack of notability," but every sentence written was referenced back to notable business and technology publications including TechCrunch, GigaOm, Mashable, and Business Insider. Please reconsider, or let me know how this submission can be made stronger. Thank you! JacobStudley1978 (talk) 18:31, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style/Dates and numbers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:00, 26 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox legislature

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Template talk:Infobox legislature. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:04, 27 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service. — Legobot (talk) 00:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

For future reference

Please note that Olympic athletes are considered de facto notable. DS (talk) 01:59, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Naren Gupta

On 1 January 2022, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Naren Gupta, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Spencer^T•C 21:42, 1 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]