User talk:Penaber49

November 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Abu Hanifa Dinawari. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. HistoryofIran (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also, don't randomly accuse others of engaging in anti-Kurdish activity just because you don't like something about them. It's not only bizarre but also quite a serious accusation. It goes without saying that altering sourced information is also disruptive. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:03, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I will add source in my next changes. But it is not convincing that you are in good faith. Penaber49 (talk) 19:13, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No, you will take your concerns to the talk page, where you will discuss properly without casting WP:ASPERSIONS. It is quite rich when you accuse me of not acting in good faith, when you are altering information supported by 8 sources. --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:21, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

In fact, I want to believe that you know that many sources in the history of nations in the Middle East are biased or incomplete. I cannot follow Persian Wikipedia because of my writing site. Misleading sources are used a lot in Turkish Wikipedia. This situation has also been expressed by Turkish scientists. I do not intend to prolong the discussion with you. Please take this as a well-meaning suggestion, take a broader view of things and facts. Penaber49 (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care and I don't need your patronizing, unhelpful "suggestion". --HistoryofIran (talk) 19:39, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Despite this answer you gave, I will still wish you well :)) Penaber49 (talk) 19:43, 18 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nowruz

See Talk:Nowruz#New year. You need to discuss your concerns there. --Mann Mann (talk) 12:13, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I understand, but why do you allow Kurds, who celebrate Newroz the biggest, to censor Kurdish names? A few years ago, Iran and Turkey banned Newroz because it was a Kurdish holiday, killed Kurds and threw them into dungeons. The Kurds are still the ones who protect Newroz the most, and the ethnic nationalists who previously hated Newroz are the ones who censor Kurdish words. I think the English wikipedia should be freed from censors, respect. Penaber49 (talk) 12:37, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]