User talk:PelleDKK

Welcome!

Hello, PelleDKK, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 15:25, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ricky T. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 00:47, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Ricky T. Thank you. Corvus cornix_talk 00:49, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Ricky T. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Corvus cornix_talk 00:56, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing cleanup tags from articles, such as you did with John Palermo, unless you actually clean up the articles or, in the cases of your removal of blpsources tags, actually add sources. Your behavior is increasingly disruptive, and if you continue, you will be blocked from editing. Corvus cornix_talk 19:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Consider the above a final warning. Corvus cornix_talk 19:28, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for repeatedly removing maintenance tags in spite of warnings. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 20:08, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Melodie Metropolitane

The article Melodie Metropolitane has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Record company does not appear to meet Wikipedia's guidelines. Article is unreferenced and the "Official Website" is under construction.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 21:24, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/PelleDKK for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. P. D. Cook ^{Talk to me!} 14:10, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 14:22, 26 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In reply to your email

You wrote that you did not understand why you have been blocked. This is rather surprising, as it was explained to you on this very talk page. You must obviously have seen these messages, since you saw fit to delete them. Please be advised, that if you make any more attempts to use sockpuppets, your block will be extended drastically. The same will be the case if you resume your disruptive editing, once the block expires. Favonian (talk) 22:45, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]