User talk:Peggy Sue

It is suspected that this user might be a sock puppet or impersonator of Diane S. Please refer to contributions for evidence. See block log and current autoblocks.

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia. (see: block log • contributions • page moves • current autoblocks)

Welcome!

Hi Peggy Sue, and a warm welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you have enjoyed editing as much as I did so far and decide to stay. Unfamiliar with the features and workings of Wikipedia? Don't fret! Be Bold! Here's some good links for your reference and that'll get you started in no time!

Editing tutorial, learn to have fun with Wikipedia. Picture tutorial, instructions on uploading images. How to write a great article, to make it an featured article status. Manual of Style, how articles should be written.

Most Wikipedians would prefer to just work on articles of their own interest. But if you have some free time to spare, here are some open tasks that you may want to help out :

RC Patrol - Keeping a lookout for vandalism. Cleanup - Help make unreadable articles readable. Requests - Wanted on WP, but hasn't been created. Merge - Combining duplicate articles into one. Wikiprojects - So many to join, so many to choose from...Take your pick!

Oh yes, don't forget to sign when you write on talk pages, simply type four tildes, like this: ~~~~. This will automatically add your name and the time after your comments. And finally, if you have any questions or doubts, don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Once again, welcome! =)

- Mailer Diablo 18:47, 20 August 2005 (UTC)

3RR warning

This is a new account, but you have already made at least two reverts. Please be aware of our core policy, 3RR. -Willmcw 20:03, August 20, 2005 (UTC)

Assume good faith

A fundamental tenet of Wikipedia is that we assume good faith. Some of the language that you used at the John W. Ratcliffe talk page is not consistent with such an assumption. A lie is an intentional misrepresentation of the facts. I do not see how you can know that the intention of the editors whom you oppose is deception. Please try to use courteous language that does not assume malice by your fellow editors. —Theo (Talk) 16:55, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

• • • If I have evidence to the fact there are lies posted, it indeed may be charged.Peggy Sue 20:15, 29 August 2005 (UTC)

I look forward to learning more of your evidence that the authors of the statements that you charcterize as "lies" made those statements with the intention to deceive. —Theo (Talk) 22:09, 29 August 2005 (UTC)