User talk:Peakat

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Hello, Peakat, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Please sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing four tildes (~~~~); our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

We're so glad you're here! Meatsgains (talk) 02:27, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation

I can see you are a new editor, but Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. You must not copy and paste text from sources you find on the web into articles as you did in the article K.S. Rajendran. I have removed the infringing text, but the material you copied is copyrighted and you should instead write such information in your own words. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Rakshak Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Rakshak Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GSS (talk|c|em) 16:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Rakshak foundation logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Rakshak foundation logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:27, 13 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Chaitali Das for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Chaitali Das is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chaitali Das until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Saqib (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

May 2018

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sock of User:Uyarafath based on editing evidence. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 12:17, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peakat (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Doc James:Hi Doc James i am wondering that i don't have any kind relationship with User:Uyarafath and i even don't know him. I am totally shocked that without checking properly you just blocked me so here i request you please check properly and unblock me because i am here to contribute only Peakat (talk) 13:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

In reviewing this matter, I would concur with Doc James. You are either a sock of Uyarafath or work for the same firm. Either way, the block is valid. As such, I am declining this request. 331dot (talk) 19:31, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Delhi Meetup !

Hello ! Greetings of the day ! A meetup plus onsite editing event is being planned in New Delhi, this Sunday. I request you to please attend the same. More details here -Abhinav619 (talk) 04:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]