User talk:Peachy1621

War over Mountainous Armenia

How are you able to create War over Mountainous Armenia that is, in many places, word for word identical to the version created by blocked sockpuppet, AmanAmanAmaTurq? Either you are the same editor or you are illicitly copying content from a blocked editor. I see no third option but am giving you a chance to explain yourself. --Yamla (talk) 18:59, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's from the military wiki. i am not aman aman ama turq Peachy1621 (talk) 19:01, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://military-history.fandom.com/wiki/War_over_Mountainous_Armenia this is where i got the text from Peachy1621 (talk) 19:02, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to do that. That's a violation of copyright. I'll go and delete that article. You must tell us what other articles you've copied content into. --Yamla (talk) 19:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can i rewrite it then Peachy1621 (talk) 19:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but you absolutely must not violate copyright. That means rewriting it from scratch, not just simply rewording the content. Please be exceptionally careful here. Any further copyright violation may result in you being indefinitely blocked from en.wikipedia. --Yamla (talk) 19:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Peachy1621 (talk) 19:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've moved your draft over to Draft:War over Mountainous Armenia. Once it is ready to be published, please submit it via the process outlined in WP:AFC. --Yamla (talk) 19:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Yamla (talk) 20:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

but the thing i copied it from is sourced- what do you want me to change? there's nothing i can possibly change or else it'd be innacurate Peachy1621 (talk) 22:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You were warned about copying and pasting. You copied and pasted. --Yamla (talk) 22:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Really, you shouldn't even have that other site open, let alone copy from it. If you are unable to edit without copying from another source, please refrain from any further editing. --Yamla (talk) 22:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

so, what do you expect me to change? it is a template, there is nothing to change, because otherwise, it would be inaccurate... what do i have to change for it to not be copied?... Peachy1621 (talk) 23:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I want to be very, very clear here. I expect you to rewrite that article from scratch and never copy and paste content from elsewhere. If you are unable to do this, you should not be writing that article. --Yamla (talk) 10:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Explain what was copied and pasted in the deleted revision. If this was about the numbers in the infobox, e.g. army size/casualties, then how exactly am I supposed to put those in? Peachy1621 (talk) 17:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I will say this one last time. When the block expires, there had better be zero instances of you copying and pasting. If you are unable to rewrite an article from scratch without copying and pasting, you have no business writing the article. --Yamla (talk) 17:11, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

then can i ask a friend to rewrite it? this is without the infobox of course Peachy1621 (talk) 07:19, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This would be dangerous. How would your friend not violate copyright? What about WP:MEAT? --Yamla (talk) 10:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

By rewriting the page about the conflict Peachy1621 (talk) 15:41, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May we continue this conversation? Peachy1621 (talk) 17:19, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Can we resume this? Peachy1621 (talk) 22:24, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of indefinite for violating copyright policy by copying text or images into Wikipedia from another source without evidence of permission. Please take this opportunity to ensure that you understand our copyright policy and our policies regarding how to use non-free content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peachy1621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to be unblocked so I can continue editing. I was blocked because I inserted an infobox that was referred to as copied. I will not insert that infobox anymore, or infoboxes in general that may be referred to as copied and pasted. I only want to rewrite the page I was originally working on. Thanks Peachy1621 (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your history to date shows that you do not understand copyright and that unblocking you would be a bad idea that could potentially expose Wikipedia to legal jeopardy. 331dot (talk) 09:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Block evasion

User was caught evading their block as ArmoGaren to continue violating copyright. --Yamla (talk) 10:08, 30 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just saw this - i don't know who ArmoGaren is lol Peachy1621 (talk) 08:48, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blanking

You are not permitted to remove (or edit) declined unblock requests for your currently active block. You are also not permitted to solicit others to help you evade your block by editing on your behalf. If you do any of these things again, you will lose access to this talk page. --Yamla (talk) 10:24, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ok Peachy1621 (talk) 17:12, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it's lonely here :(

hi Peachy1621 (talk) 11:13, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Stop wasting our time. --Yamla (talk) 11:14, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

is there any way i can see if my appeal was accepted (i can't tell what happened to it.) if i lost my appeal key? Peachy1621 (talk) 17:24, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the posting of this notice.

Yamla (talk) 17:27, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

TPA restored

Following UTRS appeal #100737. Feel free to make an unblock request as normal. Admins will be able to read your previous UTRS appeals, so you can keep it brief and just refer to that if you like. -- asilvering (talk) 02:44, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help! Peachy1621 (talk) 04:33, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

UTRS appeal #100830 was declined. User was already told to make their request here, not on UTRS. --Yamla (talk) 12:21, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Peachy1621 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. I have been banned on Wikipedia for nearly half a year now; I've learned how copyright policy works here. I believe that the reasoning used to ban me was not correct, and was unjust, which I am up to discuss. My previous appeals can also be read for further information. I didn't mean to disrupt Wikipedia, and won't cause issues again. I just wanted to create and edit things I have a passion for. I'm sorry. Peachy1621 (talk) 17:16, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am confused by your unblock request. You say the block was unjust, but you also apologize. Are you saying that you did not violate copyright? Or that you did, but should not have been blocked? PhilKnight (talk) 06:26, 9 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I was apologizing for any trouble I caused. The fact that I was trying to get across was that I had 2 copyright violations. The first one I was banned for 24 hours for, the second I was banned permanently for. To me, it seems you didn't even glance at the conversations with Yamla I had, which are STILL there. All of my reasoning is in those conversations with Yamla. That's why in the middle of the appeal, I referred you guys to them. The whole point of my unblock request is that the "copyright violations" weren't valid. @PhilKnight: Peachy1621 (talk) 00:11, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing to state that your previous block was not correct, and was unjust is unlikely to help, given that the block isn't intended to punish you but rather to prevent disruption to Wikipedia. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 03:53, 8 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Significa liberdade: How else may I prove to you guys that I will not disrupt Wikipedia when unblocked? When I was block evading, I do not remember violating copyright, doing any edit wars, or anything in general besides the block evasion itself. I created 4 pages, many of which were in the draft submission process. I want to be given one more chance to edit on Wikipedia. If I violate any rules after that, I'll accept my ban and won't come back. Peachy1621 (talk) 18:34, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You repeatedly violated WP:COPYRIGHT using Frenchman1953. Frankly, I think it's time to re-revoke talk page access. It's clear you still don't see the problems that lead to your block. I'll leave your access open for another 24 hours in case you want to make one final unblock request before I do so. --Yamla (talk) 18:52, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Where did i violate that? Peachy1621 (talk) 19:17, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to accuse me of violating copyright again and not give an actual instance of it, and revoke my talk page access, then go ahead. I'm sure you will. Otherwise, I am waiting. If you can show me where I violated copyright on that account, I'll shut up and leave Wikipedia for good. Peachy1621 (talk) 19:21, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Take a look at Special:Contributions/Frenchman1953. Specifically, the deleted contributions were deleted due to copyright. Note they are deleted, so only admins can view the content. Two specific examples are here and here. Note that neither of these were deleted by me, I'm just pointing them out to you. I expect you to honour your word now. --Yamla (talk) 20:05, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, that content was uploaded by AmanAmanAmaTurq/Movaigonel. We both used that account (I assume you can check the IP address for that edit?). Either way, I don’t see myself editing here again for the forseeable future. Bye. Peachy1621 (talk) 20:44, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]