User talk:Pc4235

Jane Burgermeister

If you want help improving this artice, I will be glad to help. I see you've saved a copy in your userspace. I don't know if the DRV will result in the standing article being reinstated but I see no reason why an article that freshly asserts the notability of the subject can't simply be recreated (however, we have to take our time and really write a good article so it won't be deleted again). Let me know. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 07:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I will try to help. It seems many of the sources are either trivial, or possibly not reliable, so it may be tricky until she attracts more mainstream press attention. Do you know of any articles in mainstream news sources, particularly sources apart from what has already been provided? They need not be available online, hard-copy newspapers, magazines and books can be just as easily cited. If you have any access to citable references, please let me know and if they are online, give me the links. If they are books, newspapers or magazines in hard-copy format only, I'll need the author, title, name of the periodical, date of publication. I'll work on this as time allows. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 17:29, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your support. After seeing soo many Jane Burgermeister videos, I tought she deserved a page. After a long search, I see that what happened is that she appeared to give credibility to the Swine Flu Conspiracy Theory, so her writings and videos were massively copied on the internet by the theory supporters. What I think now is that the important phenomenon is this new conspiracy theory, not Jane Burgermeister herself.

(talk) 11:30, 13 November 2009

You may very well be correct. The H1N1 conspiracy topic would probably be much easier to write about from a sourcing standpoint as well, especially if you can find statements from people like Ron Paul in reliable sources. Good luck and let me know if I can help. <>Multi‑Xfer<> (talk) 23:34, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of User:Pc4235/Swine Flu Conspiracy Theory

User:Pc4235/Swine Flu Conspiracy Theory, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Pc4235/Swine Flu Conspiracy Theory and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of User:Pc4235/Swine Flu Conspiracy Theory during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 04:47, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]