User talk:Pbrunnen

This is Pbrunnen's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: DICONDE (April 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nearlyevil665 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Too many primary sources. Needs more secondary sources to attest for notability.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DICONDE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DICONDE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

nearlyevil 665 16:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pbrunnen! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! nearlyevil 665 16:17, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DICONDE (April 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Smartyllama were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Same issues as before, we need independent, reliable sources

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DICONDE and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:DICONDE, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Smartyllama (talk) 13:39, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation (January 11)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

All Primary sources. No indication of notability

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 04:32, 11 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation

Hello, Pbrunnen. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 05:04, 13 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation

Hello, Pbrunnen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:34, 11 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Pbrunnen! Your additions to Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 17:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your removal of my content was ridiculous. This entire process is completely arbitrary and has no professionalism.

ALL the content that was placed on that article was written by myself and all the cited of the standards sources elicited complaints by your fellow "editors" of using too many primary sources. So I had removed them in an attempt to get the article published... This is my third complete rewrite to meet "editors" changing goal posts and I'm absolutely sick of this, especially when there are other pages that are exceedingly similar and have even less references. Secondly, you provide no evidence of your claim of plagiarism, so if you are going to bandy about with such claims you had better bring proper proof of your actions. Pbrunnen (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation. Thanks! Stuartyeates (talk) 08:46, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation (January 8)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Mattdaviesfsic was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Too many acronyms and far too wordy for anyone to understand.

Mattdaviesfsic (talk) 20:48, 8 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What part of this submission is "contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia"?!!?? This editorial process is arbitrary and unprofessional. One person says needs more primary sources, another says too many primary sources; not explained enough so I rewrote it in plain English, copyright violation allegation BS, too many acronyms so I add definitions; then other editors remove my content. This is total BS! Give my one clear reason that this page is any different than the DICOM page that is published? We are a standards committee and we are doing the same type of work as the DICOM standards committee, but their article was accepted and they are mostly primary sources too. I've put hours of effort into writing this, countless times on IRC chat with other editors and all I'm trying to do is help provide a resource so others can learn more about these standards. Pbrunnen (talk) 02:31, 13 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation

Hello, Pbrunnen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:48, 8 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation

Hello, Pbrunnen. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Digital Imaging and Communication for Nondestructive Evaluation".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:59, 3 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]