User talk:Pb30/2008

Gremolata.com

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Gremolata.com, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Gremolata.com. Kannie | talk 03:06, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Nice pickup

Out of the four of us reverting on Couplet, you were the only one to manage to actually get rid of all the vandalism. Good work. Trusilver (talk) 22:44, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

Haha, thanks. Reverts can get messy at times with multiple vandalism edits -- pb30<talk> 22:47, 11 January 2008 (UTC)

At the risk of sounding really nasty...

...your actions on my article are the primary reason I do not contribute new material. It's gotten to the point of becoming futile to add anything at all without someone coming in and slapping a notice of some sort on it.

I have no interest in the man, but I thought he was more than worthy of an article after reading his biography. He owns several of New Orleans' top restaruants, three of Houston's top restaurants as well as one of the top restaurants at Downtown Disney, probably one of the most famous restaurants there as well.

If that isn't notable, I don't know what is. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 19:49, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

• Please don't worry about it. I may have been a bit hot when I wrote the note and I'm equally sorry for writing it in the first place. It's just that there seems to be no consensus anymore. It used to be that an assertion of notability was all that was required. In fact, I remember tagging some single-sentence stubs for speedy deletion and having the move overturned. I honestly have lost track of what this site needs. Anyway, thanks for being nice even if I was less than so. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

PMDrive1061 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RFA

Hello. I asked a question on your RFA. JetLover (talk) (Report a mistake) 03:51, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA's formatting

Good evening, and congrats on your nomination for Adminship. I wish you the best of luck in your request, and hope that you get the mop without trouble. I have a quick question for you, though. You may notice that the RfA template includes a Tally next to the Userlinks and General Comments, rather than at the top as normal. We've been discussing a different format, and would like to try it out on an RfA. Please see the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship#Proposal: Relocate tally for more information. This note is basically to let you know that the tally has been deliberately moved in the template, that it isn't in the wrong place, and - unless you'd prefer to have it at the top, as normal - we'd like to see if it works in its new placement. It's your RfA, so by all means - feel free to move it if you so wish. But, since there's been some confusion, I thought I'd mention it. Thanks, and again - good luck. UltraExactZZ ^Claims ~ Evidence 03:57, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

your rfa

Question 4 Dlohcierekim 05:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Tongues of Fire Bean

I've turned down the speedy delete request for this article because although the article is short,

• It seems to clearly identify its subject
• It asserts notability (common use in Italian cooking)
• It may be a hoax, but whether it is or not isn't blatantly obvious to someone who doesn't know beans.

Suggest taking article to AfD. Best, --Shirahadasha (talk) 03:57, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism revert

When reverting vandalism, always be careful to check that you're reverting to a good edit. This [1] edit reverted to a bad edit by ClueBot. I've cleaned it up, and it can happen to anyone, but wanted to call it to your attention. Thanks for your work and good luck with the RFA!  :-) - Philippe | Talk 18:45, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Indeed - like I said, it can happen to anyone. But since I changed your work, I wanted to let you know. :-) - Philippe | Talk 21:08, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Your edits on my article

Thank you for motivating me to learn to edit Wikipedia. The article on which you reverted my changes still needs cleaning up. I'm sure it will get there. 71.178.221.25 (talk) 03:43, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

71.178.221.25 (talk) has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Adminship

Congratulations, you are now an administrator! Now is the time to visit the Wikipedia:New admin school and, if you haven't already, to look through the Wikipedia:Administrators' how-to guide and Wikipedia:Administrators' reading list. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me, or at the Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard. Warofdreams talk 04:20, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks to Warofdreams and all those that supported my RfA. To those that opposed, I'll keep your suggestions in mind. -- pb30<talk> 04:29, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Congrats! Malinaccier (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Congratulations! --Coppertwig (talk) 23:22, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for tagging the page 163.153.162.12. The school district has reported that they have identified the students involved and are taking appropriate action. --NERIC-Security (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Lol

Thanks... I never really checked if you were an admin :p RT | Talk 17:48, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Gratz then! :) RT | Talk 17:49, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

#wikipedia-en-admins

If that was indeed you requesting access, please indicate it while logged in. John Reaves 18:13, 31 January 2008 (UTC)

Btline "revert"

Hi thank you for editing Wikipedia! However, I am afraid you are wrong. If you took the time to look at what I am doing, you will understand what I was doing. The talk page in question is not longer in use. I am therefore redirecting it to a new page. In future, please check before making accusations on my talk page. I am going to delete the accusation! Many thanks, and good luck editing further articles. Wikipedia needs you! Btline (talk) 18:28, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

I Am The author

I am the author of the page that i deleted. I am not the only author but i did start it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Safirbabar (talk • contribs) 03:39, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:Pedrodeigo2

Hi! Please block the user. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 18:34, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

User talk:204.171.48.66

Please block the user too. And the link the user added was so vicious that, if there's a way, do something about it. I had to shut down my computer. Thank you. Oda Mari (talk) 19:02, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

Other admins blocked the two users above. Regards. Oda Mari (talk) 19:19, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

User:Refsworldlee/Oliver Golding

Thanks for the delete. Best wishes. Ref ^(chew)(do) 00:30, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Mistake

Sorry, I am a new user and messed up. Can you please: delete the article "CICS_Northtown_Academy" delete the article "Chicago International Charter School Northtown" rename "CICS_Northtown_Academy2" to "CICS_Northtown_Academy"

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaldak (talk • contribs) 21:16, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your help! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Yaldak (talk • contribs) 21:23, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of talk page.

Hi, you deleted Talk:Ghulam Mohammed (disambiguation) as (CSD G8: Talkpage of deleted or non-existent article). I noticed that this page was actually moved not too long ago. Perhaps it needs to be undeleted and moved back to that article? (not an admin myself, so I cannot verify). --TheDJ (talk • contribs) 15:55, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Melchizedek (band) albums

I have nominated Category:Melchizedek (band) albums (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Jfire (talk) 18:14, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Another block?

Hi Pb30: A few days ago, you blocked User:65.41.113.251 (see User_talk:65.41.113.251) for vandalism. They're at it again, vandalizing the Bald Eagle article. Any chance you can extend the block another couple of days? MeegsC | Talk 17:42, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Huggle User Category

Hi there. I have seen that you use huggle by the fact that you have automatically updated the huggle white list(it does this when closing huggle). I was wondering if you would add the category [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to your user page so that it fills out and we know who actually uses huggle. If you do not want to you do not have to. I am also sorry if i have already talked to you about this or you no longer use huggle but i sent it to everyone that has edited the page since mid January. I hope we can start to fill out this category. If you would like to reply to this message then please reply on my talk page as i will probably not check here again. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism

• hey, thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page. I've been getting that a lot recently. Probably because I try to revert so much vandalism, and the vandals don't like it. Oh well. What can you do about it? I'll add your pages to my watchlist, its a goodwill thing I do for those who reverted vandalism from my page. So, if you are vandalised, I will do my best to help you :) Steve Crossin (talk) 17:22, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Huggle Category Problem

Hi there.You are receiving this message from me as you have not added your huggle category correctly. At the moment on category here you can see that you are sorted under the letter U. To fix this please change the [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle]] to [[Category:Wikipedians who use Huggle|YOURNICKNAMEHERE]]. This will fix the problem. If you do not change this within a few days then i will do this for you but i would prefer to send you a message like this than just go and change your page. If you want to contact me then please use my talk page as i will not be checking back here. Thanks for your help. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 16:47, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Question because Bot didn't provide the answer

Hi. You deleted a page I created called "Ruby James". The bot told me to go to WP:WMD where it says "none of the information on a 'deleted' page has actually been lost. Continue reading for details." So I read the article and it's not mentioned where the information is now. Can you tell me? It was much work to go through the eight or so sources I gave and I hope it's not lost. I couldn't find an answer on the FAQ and by searching the Help Desk. Also, it was deleted so fast I did not have the chance to discuss and give the reasons for notability (though I thought the coverage I linked to was enough). Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 22:02, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi Pb30, your response left me confused as you did not address anything I asked you. I asked about where to actually find what was deleted ("none of the information on a 'deleted' page has actually been lost") because I had searched the provided links and wasn't able to find it. Additionally, you did not address what I said about not being able to expand upon the notability because, as I said, the article was deleted so fast. The claim I had not included citations or references also confuses me, I had eight in the article, for practically everything I wrote. Sorry to bother you but I tried to find the answer on my own and couldn't. Hekerui (talk) 00:12, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you, I read that and certainly I saw it under #1. I only wanted to know where the content of what I wrote in the article went after deletion. Not to recreate it (that seems impossible when you say my links are not worthy). That's all I need to know and can't find. I read Wikipedia:WWMPD, I have four links on my talk page to that now, I just don't see where what I wrote went. It is perhaps obvious but I checked the deletion log and it's nowhere to be found and Wikipedia:WWMPD mentions it as being there but I can't find it. Do you want me to ask the Help Desk? I just thought because you wrote "feel free to ask" I would ask you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hekerui (talk • contribs) 00:44, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

WP:Lectures on the 6th

Kim is starting the lectures on April 6th around 15:00 UTC (although that is apparently open to discussion). Just a reminder... Xavexgoem (talk) 14:11, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Lectures

The lecture has started. irc.freenode.net, #wikipedia-en-lectures

--Kim Bruning (talk) 15:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

#wikipedia-en-lectures @ 15:00 UTC today, yay. Xavexgoem (talk) 15:01, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

Today (Apr 20th), around 15:00 UTC! Possibly on Skype, but certainly on IRC (#wikipedia-en-lectures on freenode)! I don't actually know about the Skype details... Message me on Skype (xavexgoem) about that, if you have it (no harm in getting it, either), and then maybe by that time I'll have a clue :-p Xavexgoem (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank You

Thanks for reverting the vandalism to my talk pages. --Deadly∀ssassin 21:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC)

holy SHIT ur fast.

lol i was jkin i was testin ya 2 see how fast u were and wow u were fast! im impressed. =) nice job. cya round

WP:Lectures

They are today (27 April 2008) at 15:00 UTC. Here is the skype link & here's the IRC link. Xavexgoem (talk) 15:02, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Lectures time

Yeah, we're posting on time for once (40 minutes early). Todays lecture is by Vassyana (an expert mediator), who will be talking about how to deal with conflicts, whether you are a mediator or not. Hope to see you there! --Kim Bruning (talk) 14:15, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Lectures

Todays lecture is starting! The topic is "How source experts judge source reliability" and the speaker is DGG. The meeting location for setup is #wikipedia-en-lectures on irc.freenode.net. The lecture will be given over skype. Contact Filll2 or kim_bruning to be invited to the lecture chat also.

--Kim Bruning (talk) 15:08, 18 May 2008 (UTC)

CfD nomination of Category:Embassies in Washington, D.C.

I have nominated Category:Embassies in Washington, D.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:Diplomatic missions in Washington, D.C. (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Россавиа ^Диалог 20:42, 16 June 2008 (UTC)

john bull blanking socks

Now they've started blanking the talk page! miquonranger03 (talk) 03:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Newest sock: User:34ln6kk

71.174.246.27

Please block this IP address for persistent vandalism. today's contributions are particularly annoying.--otherlleft (talk) 15:02, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

208.25.97.242

Thanks for blocking this IP, but more importantly please get better soon! -FlyingToaster (talk) 15:09, 7 October 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

For cleaning up my talk page and blocking that IP. He'll probably be back tomorrow, he seems to have some kind of obsession, but maybe he'll give up. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 15:50, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

To let you know

Gofo is on last warning. -- IRP ☎ 16:06, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Note: User replied on my talk page. -- IRP ☎ 21:11, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

...for reverting the vandalism on my page. JohnCD (talk) 16:22, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

User talk:71.155.229.46

Hi. I was watching WP:AIAV myself. Are you sure this guy was vandalizing? It appears to be a legitimate quote from the film that has no ulterior purpose. The guy ignored warnings, admittedly, but I'm not sure that he intended any harm. - Richard Cavell (talk) 16:31, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Nice one

Looks like they were sitting counting the days until the previous 1 year block expired so they could get blocked again. --GraemeL ^(talk) 18:15, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

I was thinking the same thing, probably marked the new date on their calendar :) -- pb30<talk> 18:17, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

thanks for the help. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bobbyksehgal (talk • contribs) 19:00, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

User page

Thanks for the revert. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 11:00, 7 November 2008 (UTC)

Bobsmith69

See User Talk:Bobsmith69. Not sure whether you are watching that page. Han-Kwang (t) 10:32, 8 November 2008 (UTC)

request for third opinion

Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down a section on 'allegation of cruelty' as subsection under 'criticism' section in Operation Blue Star article, concerns include WP:NPOV, the summary of dispute can be found at [2], please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that 'alleged' bias may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 07:50, 9 November 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks, best wishes, Eric Wester (talk · contribs · email) 02:41, 10 November 2008 (UTC)

Template:DANFS talk

I noticed that you created Template:DANFS talk. You may be interested in the conversation at Template talk:DANFS#Problem with category inclusion. Regards—G716 <^T·_C> 03:27, 5 December 2008 (UTC)

Nope

That was not me. Please get it right in the future. 89.243.213.86 (talk) 21:22, 6 December 2008 (UTC)