User talk:Pauseypaul
Surprise your stalkers
[edit]Yes Bling!
Welcome!
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia, Pauseypaul! Thank you for your contributions. I am ToBeFree and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}}
at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages, feel free to sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! ~ ToBeFree (talk) 18:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Is this a New Thing why did I not get The Cookies Welcome?
Reference errors on 10 March
[edit]Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the List of awards and nominations received by Adele page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)
June 2016
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to List of awards and nominations received by Adele, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. State something other than "fake", which should justify the removal of a perfectly notable award. FrB.TG (talk) 10:12, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Please stop adding FAKE Awards to Adele page & stop harassing others users... you need to spend a little more time reading , before pressing delete. I did give a Valid reason..but because I wont give you Stars you removed! Why are you adding Fake awards & deleting Real ones? ....I did not just say it was Fake I listed the award website. Pauseypaul (talk)Pauseypaul (talk)
Adele Glamour Awards June 2016 , She did not win any award you listed her for & there was No Such Award in 2016. Pauseypaul (talk)
London, England
[edit]Hi.
Just to let you know (per the Adele page), I wasn't in any way confused as to whether England was in the UK or the UK was in England, I was removing England because another editor had changed her intro from English to British because they think people can't be English on Wikipedia, just British. So it seemed more consistent to have that she was born in the UK (making her British) than England (which suggests she would be introduced as English). But since you have changed it back to how it was before, I have also changed the intro back to what it was before for the sake of consistency.
Thanks Rodericksilly (talk) 03:54, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Thanks all nice and Tidy again Pauseypaul (talk) 11:47, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
List of most viewed YouTube videos
[edit]Hi, I made that edit because the current phrase "In June 2015" is ambiguous. It can mean the beginning of June, the end of June, etc. And in the latter case, the following statement would be wrong, see the discussion here. Gap9551 (talk) 01:31, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
25
[edit]Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 25 (Adele album), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Do not remove sourced sales from any article. And also don't add this, purposefully adding a link to IRMA website, when there has been no certification displayed for the album. —IB [ Poke ] 09:49, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Link to blanking! Caution: Removal of content, blanking what did I blank? 2 weeks ago.... strange Pauseypaul (talk)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pauseypaul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Hello
[edit]Hi, Hello went up from 16th place to 15th on December 18, 2017, this is the edit, you can find what you want on the history of the page, bye bye--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 18:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)
You are a little star thank you Luke— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pauseypaul (talk • contribs)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Pauseypaul. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
New discussion
[edit]Hi, there is a new discussion on Talk:List of most-liked YouTube videos, if you're interested and you want to leave a comment you are welcome, bye--Luke Stark 96 (talk) 16:32, 1 September 2019 (UTC) Thank you for the Heads Up I also support deletion this is clearly original research and is un-sourced have added my pennys worth Pauseypaul (talk) 16:53, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]February 2020
[edit]Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. 115.164.80.205 (talk) 00:39, 18 February 2020 (UTC)
Interesting that this user was blocked & IP address is currently blocked. shortly after this silly comment Pauseypaul (talk) 21:27, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Lucy Bronze
[edit]- Same at Lucy Bronze. Don't make this more of a habit, consider this message a disruptive editing warning. Kingsif (talk) 18:49, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
- No not the Same at Lucy Bronze. The Vice reference link does not have a comment from Bronze & it is clearly just Tagging her in four times at the bottom of the article to get people to out Lucy, which is not the place of Wikipedia to do. I do not feel that this was disruptive. Have you read the talk page the Vice comment was added by a sockpuppet how is it still on the page? Pauseypaul (talk) 23:59, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Players clubs "as of"
[edit]Hi, this is just to give clarity and ask a question. I have reverted a few 'club updates' at the England women's national football team article (not just Nobbs) because both the current list and the recent call-ups list are dated, and that date is in the past. Your revert reason seems to think I removed her as no longer being in the England squad, maybe, though I didn't. To give a more complete explanation than an edit reason will allow: I based my edits - to retain the player club at the time of the list's date (i.e. the last game they were called up for England) - on the under-X lists and various squad lists for historic tournaments doing the same. If there are other players whose clubs are 'too recent' for when they last played for England, the same would need to be done (but I think Daly moved before), in my interpretation. Of course, I said to please revert me if the (for lack of a better descriptor) main squad list always includes players' current clubs, even if the person hasn't been called up since a move. And, if there isn't a standard and you think the clubs should be updated anyway, I am open to that discussion. Thanks, Kingsif (talk) 03:03, 6 January 2023 (UTC)
NPA
[edit]There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.Kingsif (talk) 22:22, 27 July 2023 (UTC)
Question
[edit]You've used the phrase "a professional Wikipedian with 50k+ edits under this name." Who is that about? CityOfSilver 17:23, 30 July 2023 (UTC)
Using non standard characters
[edit]Can you stop using non standard characters like the those from the mathematical bold character set to type English text as you did here [1] and in many other comments? Doing so may break screenreaders or otherwise cause WP:accessibility problems and may also cause problems for search engines and potentially may even fail to display on some extremely old or low end devicess. If you need to format your text, please use the normal character set with standard formatting using wiki markup such as using '''three consecutive apostrophes''' for bold text or ''two consecutive apostrophes'' for italic text. See Help:Formatting for more help. Nil Einne (talk) 12:25, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
- I have no idea how the mathematical plus character appeared, I merely typed into LibreOffice 7.4 copied and posted a reply.
- ‘‘‘Thank you for the helpful links’’’ I think. Pauseypaul (talk) 13:54, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:47, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 19 November 2024 (UTC)