User talk:Paulbrock/Archive1
 | This is an archive of past discussions with User:Paulbrock. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Welcome!
Hello, Paulbrock, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} after the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! Simply south 21:06, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
Pubs
Yeah I should be able to help out with pubs in the Shropshire and Manchester areas. Let me know if you set anything up. :) David 20:46, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
Top or not?
Hi. Either category is probably ok. It is just a mechanism for broadly splitting out the articles so editors can target the more significant ones that have been neglected. MRSC • Talk 06:30, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Just wanted to thanks for the B-class rating you awarded to West Bromwich Albion F.C.. When I first joined Wikipedia the article was extremely poor (IMO): it had lots of text but no images (apart from the club badge and kits), virtually no references, the history section was incredibly recentist and the layout very non-standard. I've done a quite a bit of work to try to bring it up to standard, so it's good to know that I'm getting there. There's still a long way to go in order to get to Featured Article status though, which is what I'd like to achieve ultimately. I have a good idea where most of the remaining weaknesses lie and am looking to address these, but if you have any particular observations having reviewed the article, I'd be really interested to hear from you. Cheers. --Jameboy 21:57, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
Thank you ...
ta .... Kbthompson 09:36, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
script
You requested that {{WPLondon}} be added to the assessment script. This has been done. –Outriggr § 05:48, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:43, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Football Task Forces
Take a look here for ideas on how to set up a task force. Kingjeff 00:44, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Can you add FC Bayern Munich Task Force to sidebar? Kingjeff 22:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Netherlands
Thank you for setting up the task force, but please, please, the country is called the Netherlands, not Holland. Please see Netherlands#Naming conventions. Using Holland for the Netherlands is akin to using England for the UK. AecisBrievenbus 11:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
- That's ok, mistakes can happen. I think everything has been fixed now. But thanks for setting up the taskforce :) AecisBrievenbus 12:07, 30 June 2007 (UTC)
Italy task force
Yeah, I was fully involved in setting up the Italian taskforce. I already had that link, but I wanted first to assess as many articles as possible (at least all the ones in my watchlist, surely many more you could wonder). Thanks for the interest, I'll surely knock at your wikidoor in case I am in need of help. --Angelo 19:35, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
New to football/USA and Canada taskforce
I'm new to WikiProject Football/USA and Canada task force, and I'd like to know how I can help the project. I was trying to figure out how to use the USA = yes and Canada = yes tags, but I don't really understand how to. --TFCforever 15:49, 11 July 2007 (UTC)
Hello, Paulbrock
- I responded to your concerns as to the Supercouple article, which you can see with this link...[1]...on the Supercouple article's talk page. Flyer22 00:21, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- I responded again, of course, on the Supercouple article's take page as to your concerns on some of its content. Not that I have to alert you every time I do, I mean, you'll likely discover that yourself, but I also want to point out that User: Anetode also stated some concerns similar to yours about the Supercouple article, in which you can see some of on my talk page with this link...[2].
If you can help on improving the Supercouple article in any way, please do. Flyer22 02:45, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Need your help!
Hello! I hope you are feeling great. I need a help from you with regards to templates. For more information, please view this page. I feel that it is paramount to achieve consistency with regards to templates. If you know how to correct this, it would be much appreciated. --Siva1979Talk to me 05:11, 24 July 2007 (UTC)
- Hello again! I need your comments in this page. Your views in this matter would be greatly appreciated. --Siva1979Talk to me 17:23, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
James Milner Career section
Not really asking for full feedback on this article (although I wouldn’t mind it). I’d just like to know what you feel the best way the divide up the Career section is, by Club, by season, not at all or some other way. Please leave your reply under the section in my talk page named “Milner Career section”. Buc 16:45, 14 August 2007 (UTC)
rm wikiproject
add a link and i will do the same. just tell me when. Smithcool 20:54, 26 August 2007 (UTC)
Sorry, do you know anything about this issue? --necronudist 21:23, 4 September 2007 (UTC)
It's a very high-use, high-risk template. It's used on 20,428 pages, and frankly, it shouldn't be updated with a very high frequency. Without protection, it's a target of vandalism or poorly-written code; when the template is changed, all 20,428 pages must be re-cached, sometimes twice if edits are incorrect. Looking through the edit history, this has happened recently, when edits were made that caused whitespace to be added. Template sandboxes exist for this reason, to test new code before changing a high-use template. I hope that clarifies the situation. Cheers. --MZMcBride 22:11, 22 September 2007 (UTC)
- Absolutely. When you have new code to be added to a protected page, you use an {{editprotected}} request. On the template talk page, you put the code
{{editprotected}}near the requested change and it will add the page to Category:Wikipedia protected edit requests. Several admins keep an eye on that category, however, if you'd like assistance quicker, you can leave a note on my (or any other admin's) talk page. Just try to be sure that the code is accurate and that an admin can understand what you want to be done. Generally, the more easily-understandable the request is, the faster it gets done. : - ) Cheers. --MZMcBride 01:19, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Curious about the articles by quality statisitics box
I was wondering how to create an articles by quality statistics box like the one on the Football in USA/Canada task force: {{Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Football in the USA and Canada articles by quality statistics}}. I have recently created a task force on a different topic and would like to know how to link the task force tags into categories and statistics like you have done on the USA/Canada task force. I have modeled the design of the task force after the USA/Canada one, so however you were able to set it up will proably work on my project. I'd really like to know how to do it. Thank you so much! TFCforever 15:48, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
Football articles
Firstly I welcome your comments. I am simply suggesting things and welcome full and open discussions regarding mergers, page moves etc. I would not cary out any potential controversial activities wihout solid reasoning based in policy, guidelines and constructive discusions. All of the proposals made, have been put to discussion before anything goes ahead. Please feel free to contribute to discussions on associated talk pages. Many thanks Lucy-marie (talk) 15:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Thats why I taged the pages and started discussions to avoid possible COI.--Lucy-marie (talk) 19:58, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
response
Thank you. I'm still learning about Wikipedia procedures. I'll do what you suggested. Enigmaman (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2008 (UTC)
Notability of non-playing footballers (AfD:Paul Rodgers (footballer))
Hello! You contributed to AfD:Paul Rodgers by voting to keep him. As you may know, WP:FOOTY is currently working to finalize a Notability criteria. One of the points of the current suggestion that are still being debated is more or less a translation of AfD:Paul Rodgers. I'm now trying to come up with a suggestion that summarizes this AfD, and would like you to comment on my interpretation of your arguments, and perhaps even discuss a suggestion. Thank you! Sebisthlm (talk) 20:25, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Quick question about WP:Football USA/Canada task force
I was wondering about the importance rankings for articles within the scope of the USA/Canada task force of WP:Football. Should the rankings reflect the article's importance to the entire WikiProject or just the task force? For instance, an article on D.C. United would be High or even Top if the ranking was only for the task force, but only Mid if the ranking is for all of WP:Football. To this point, I have treated all articles' importance as relative to the entire project, but the number that would be affected by a change is minimal. (Most articles are about little-known players who would be of Low importance regardless of the system used) TFCforever 00:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
AutoWikiBrowser Application
You are eligible to use AutoWikiBrowser! I have reviewed your application and a admin will add you shortly to the list! --Party!Talk to me! 02:57, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
Cardiff and the 2012 Olympics
Cardiff International Sports Village won't be hosting events, I believe, but it will be used for training athletes. The Millenium Stadium on the other hand will host events. I'll find some sources shortly Welshleprechaun (talk) 17:55, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Cheers for pointing me to the above. There really is a policy/guidance note for everything on here isn't there?! Another one to add to the know how list. Thanks Dick G (talk) 08:25, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Palace of Westminster
Hello there. Although I have left my messages regarding the Palace of Westminster in its talk page, I have only done so because they regard the subject and its article's improvement; they are more intended for you rather than any one else. I should very much appreciate it if you could answer. I have a couple of other concerns as well, but nothing major. I should really like to see this article re-featured in time, and I am sure that you share these feelings with me. Regards, Waltham, The Duke of 19:59, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Template:Football/doc
Hi Paul. I streamlined Template:Football/doc and created examples of how the template will appear under various parameter scenarios at Template:Football/Examples. Congrats on a well maintained template: easy-to-read concise code with no extras and everything working as designed. Please feel free to revise my changes as appropriate. GregManninLB (talk) 15:19, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
London meetup
Hi, I saw your great work on Palace of Westminster. It would be fantastic to see that article featured again, best of luck with it! I thought you might be interested in the upcoming London meetup, on May 11th. You can sign up on the page if you're keen. the wub "?!" 18:54, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Ooh, and I just thought to check your contributions, see how long you'd been around. Happy first edit anniversary! the wub "?!" 18:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Clough deid?
Nigel's still with us. I think you thought you were looking at his pop's article. - Dudesleeper / Talk 02:48, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Timothy Wyllie
Hello Paulbrock! I just wanted to drop a line commending you for the way you are editing the T. Wyllie page! Perhaps the UK is not as squeamish about things that are outside the range of American Post Modern Puritan theology.
Gratefully,
Rob Davis (aka Daynal/Rldavisiv) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.105.6.44 (talk) 07:14, 26 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for April 21st, 2008.
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 17 | 21 April 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 16:18, 25 April 2008 (UTC)
Keston Windmill
Are you sure this is only stub class? if so, what needs doing to get it up to start class? Mjroots (talk) 18:26, 26 April 2008 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot (talk) 04:15, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
Patrolling
Thank you for helping to patrol the far end of the newpages log. DS (talk) 02:36, 8 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 2nd and 9th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 18 | 2 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 19 | 9 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 06:22, 10 May 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for May 12th, 2008.
|
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 20 | 12 May 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:23, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
Redirect
Hi I am not at all sure why you have so speedily redirected my List of people from Lewes, East Sussex without consulting me as to my motives. It isn't the same thing at all as the Category: as I said on my note when I began the list there are fifty names to be included. It is part of a rewrite of the Lewes article which I am undertaking to comply with [the Wiki recommended way of writing about settlements. I did a complete trawl of all the links to the town and came up with the fifty plus names of people with some connection with the town, few of which had been linked to the category. Since there are so many, it would be impossible to list them all on the main article and so, had you given me time, I should have noted as a link with a paragraph title Notable people from Lewes. I have taken it back so that I can complete the work. Peter Shearan (talk) 06:54, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- I have now completed the list. I have also added a comment of the page to which you redirected it originally! Peter Shearan (talk) 10:41, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
- you might also see my note on the Category:People from Lewes article: categories are getting overused, and the result is far from satisfactory. Peter Shearan (talk) 10:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)
Lewes
Paul, Thank you for your remarks. As you see I have now completed the list, and included a reference to it on the Lewes article. I guess as it's open house there will always be these superfluous articles, and it's pretty difficult to take some sort of stand against them! Anyway, I'm now working on the rest of the article, but that will take some little while. Thanks again Peter Shearan (talk) 17:31, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
I don't mind
The article is/was in my watchlist because of this AfD, and when it popped back up with zero content I came to the logical conclusion. I don't bite newbies. --Closedmouth (talk) 12:45, 19 May 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the suggestions
Hi, you are right about the backlog. Thanks for reminding. Shovon (talk) 11:01, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
| This is an archive of past discussions with User:Paulbrock. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |