User talk:Paul haynes

While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, please be aware that Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, and as such, if you add non-notable information such as you did to Volleyball, then it is highly likely to be removed. If you have verifiable evidence showing that Association Flipper is notable, please feel free to re-add the information, along with the evidence. That all said...

Welcome!

Hello, Paul haynes, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Pak21 16:22, 6 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greenpeace II

Thanks for your thoughts. I have moved the section to the criticism page, but with clarification, which I think sits well for the moment, but you might want to change. I have added a few thoughts on both the Greenpeace and the criticism discussion pages, which I would like to hear your thoughts on. Thanks again Paul haynes 11:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks for your hard work. And I was just thinking to myself "oh yeah, i should put that mergeto template up". -Theanphibian ^{(talk • contribs)} 13:02, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of E3 Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on E3 Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. role^player 17:42, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Paul. At this moment, the article does not appear to meet our notability guidelines, so it cannot stay in Wikipedia's articlespace indefinitely. In the meantime, I have moved the article to User:Paul haynes/E3 Foundation as a userspace draft so that you can work on bringing the article up to standards. Regards, Dabomb87 (talk) 23:13, 13 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:E3 Foundation, from its old location at User:Paul haynes/E3 Foundation. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:50, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:E3 Foundation concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:E3 Foundation, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:E3 Foundation

Hello, Paul haynes. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "E3 Foundation".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Sam Sailor ^Talk! 14:46, 30 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]