User talk:Paul Slocum
HD DVD obsolete
[edit]Hi Paul. I think that the word "obsolete" is a more accurate description of HD DVD than "discontinued". The format has been abandoned by its chief developer, Toshiba. However, there is currently a fire sale of HD DVD players and discs and manufacturers and stores try to get rid of them, so they're still on sale. Also, LG is still trying to promote its dual-mode HD DVD + Blu Ray player, as I guess it's still useful to Blu Ray users as well as people who have an existing collection of HD DVD disks. It's really hard to define at what point the format has been discontinued. When the last player or disk has been sold? However, obsolete is easier to define, as HD DVD has been supplanted by something newer, and is no longer the "general" thing as the list of stores refusing to stock it increases. This fits the definition of "obsolete", as you can see from a dictionary definition: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/obsolete. Also, the references describe it as obsolete rather than discontinued. Regards, Lester 00:57, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for File:Facemaker sm.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Facemaker sm.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 04:17, 19 September 2010 (UTC)
The article Talley Dunn Gallery has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No indication here of notability, or that it could possibly meet WP:NCORP
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 12:55, 19 September 2021 (UTC)