User talk:Paul HT

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HellermannTyton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Pol430 talk to me 09:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi wikipedians, to be honest, I think it is quite difficult to make a contribution to wikipedia. However, I still think that it is worth it. But I will not start an article, again. Particular in this case, there are no sources on the internet regarding the history of the company. Apart from local articles in Spanish and Polish and German. Exept from the history pages of the company. We'll see, --Paul HT (talk) 13:20, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

Hello, Paul HT. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HellermannTyton, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Pol430 talk to me 09:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Paul HT. You have new messages at Pol430's talk page.
Message added 20:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Pol430 talk to me 20:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: HellermannTyton (September 23)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HellermannTyton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Hasteur (talk) 19:39, 23 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Paul HT, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: HellermannTyton (January 10)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/HellermannTyton.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chris1834 (talk) 17:54, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Further review

Paul HT, I got your message this morning and went back and reviewed your site again. I am not sure why I labeled it that way as you are correct there are enough sources. All I can say is that I reviewed almost 200 sites in the last 3 days trying to help get some articles processed as we still have over 1000 articles to be reviewed and sometimes your mind goes crazy. The only comment I have for your article is that the history section is written as a timeline and to make it more effective and easier to read it should be rewritten in prose. That isn't a reason to keep it from be created though. Chris1834 (talk) 13:33, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

While I would move this article to mainspace, when preparing to do so it turns out the article already exists. You must know that as you yourself have edited it. I can't create your article with the same name as an article that already exists. Your 2 options would be to simply copy your code and paste it in to the article that already exists, eliminating what is currently there. Or propose the old article for deletion at WP:AFD, which will take some time and has to have a consensus from multiple editors. If you simply copy your code in to the old one, you avoid this AFC process altogether anyway and I can't see anyone challenging you as your article is far better than the one that currently exists. Chris1834 (talk) 13:45, 13 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]