User talk:Patriot.ET

Shukur Samsak moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shukur Samsak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Justi yaya 13:10, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the page contains zero secondary sources. Subjects should have multiple secondary sources giving significant coverage for them to be included. Justi yaya 13:11, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Shukur Samsak

Hello, Patriot.ET. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Shukur Samsak".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:00, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shukur Samsak moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shukur Samsak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because you may have a possible Conflict of Interest and please do not recreate deleted drafts in main article space; have them reviewed as drafts. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

hey, thanks for your help and advice, I've spent almost 6 hours now improving the article, keeping it neutral and adding references. The article is much better and improved now, the article is ready for publication now! Patriot.ET (talk) 16:31, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shukur Samsak (August 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by UtherSRG was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You may want to revert back to the previous draft before continuing. I have restored the deleted history to make that easier, or I can fully restore the previous to the current version.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shukur Samsak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

UtherSRG (talk) 12:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Patriot.ET! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! UtherSRG (talk) 12:48, 7 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shukur Samsak moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Shukur Samsak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because needs review - please do not copy-paste move articles. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. UtherSRG (talk) 11:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But it had already been reviewed and when I submitted it I didn’t get any response for 1 month. Patriot.ET (talk) 15:15, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was indeed reviewed, and declined. The process is then you updated and submit it for review again. Then you wait for the review to happen. There are tons of reviews waiting to happen. Just be patient. - UtherSRG (talk) 15:28, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, but you’re like the only one out of all the people who has edited my article that take it away and always tell me to wait, but okay then. Patriot.ET (talk) 15:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wait What are you doing!!!! It says in my notifications that my article was reviewed 19 hours ago, and that it was already accepted and reviewed. Why are you not letting me post this article and keep taking it away. Patriot.ET (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was reviewed by @Mccapra Patriot.ET (talk) 15:56, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was even connected to a wikidata Patriot.ET (talk) 16:03, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't an AFC review. That was a NPP review, which is not the same. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:36, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shukur Samsak (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by SafariScribe were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't meet WP:NPOL. Sources aren't reliable too. Pls read up WP:42.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Shukur Samsak and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 16:55, 10 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]