User talk:Patrickzuili
Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Peer-to-peer, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --LjL (talk) 23:32, 12 July 2009 (UTC)
If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Peer-to-peer, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines. Your username, as well as your insistence in re-adding claims that were pointed out as dubious and badly sources by several people, makes me suspect a conflict of interest. Even if this is not the case, please abstain from engaging in an edit war, and instead provide valid sources for your claims when they are requested. --LjL (talk) 23:40, 12 July 2009 (UTC)