User talk:Patrick/Feb 2008 - Dec 2009

Archive:

Speedy deletion of Template:Academy Awards nominees

A tag has been placed on Template:Academy Awards nominees requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 02:59, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

E template issue

Your highly appropriate change of this template so that it follows the MOS guideline has been reverted by some dickhead called Knowledge Seeker. Template_talk:E#MOS_breach:_spacing_of_the_.C3.97_sign Tony (talk) 07:46, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The WikiProject Films coordinator selection process is starting. We are aiming to elect five coordinators to serve for the next six months; if you are interested in running, please sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 10:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Centralized discussion about dates

Hi Patrick. I noticed you created Category:Dates and there is currently a centralized discussion going on, at Wikipedia talk:Centralized discussion/Removal of many individual date articles, about individual date articles (after June 30, 2003 was listed for deletion by someone). Your input on these articles would be appreciated. Thanks. --Pixelface (talk) 18:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Age templates

Sorry about the age templates. I had tested them in all the places that I use them, but didn't think of them being used in equations. I've added nts versions of the templates at {{age/nts}} and {{age in days/nts}}. --Arctic Gnome (talk • contribs) 16:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help:Namespace

Hi Patrick. We stumbled on each others edits a lot lately, seems you are hard working in partly the same areas as I am. :)

I noticed you changed the links in the section "Template programming" that I had added to meta:Help:Namespace (Help:Namespace). Your edit comment and the change doesn't seem to match, or I am missunderstanding what you tried to achieve. So here's what I see:

The way you used {{mlw}} didn't change anything, as far as I can see. The way I coded it made it look exactly the same. Both ways also make the link to a local blue link on the English Wikipedia.

I agree that my edit summary does not apply, I thought on Wikipedia en: would give interwiki link style, like w:. Even so, the problem with en: is that when copying the wikitext to wikibooks etc. the target would be wrong. Also, {{mlw}} has additional Linksearch functionality.--Patrick (talk) 07:38, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You used {{tiw}} on the template names. The old way I used already made the links turn local blue on the English Wikipedia. But if you really wanted to add all those tiny "( talk edit history links )" then I see what you were doing. But that adds unnecessary complexity to the text. And I think it is much better that the first-time visitors to that template come directly to Template:Main talk other and see its documentation, rather than clicking one of the "( talk edit history links )".

{{tiw}} on Wikipedia does not have a history link. I also removed the talk link. {{tiw}} and {{tim}} are the standard ways of linking to templates from help pages.--Patrick (talk) 07:40, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I see it you made the text dependant of more templates and thus more likely to break when replicated on other language Wikipedias and on other projects, without really adding anything. Or what am I missing?

As mentioned, avoiding en: helps in this regard. Yes, each wiki needs these templates, but there are only a few of this kind.--Patrick (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and you can respond here, I'll be watching this talk page.

--David Göthberg (talk) 03:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ah now I see, thanks. I have also read up a little meanwhile, so now I understand better what you mean. (I think that was my first edit to such meta help documents.) I didn't know when I coded that that "en:" links cause problems on Wikibooks etc. And I just tested, you are right, "w:" links doesn't turn into local links here at Wikipeida. :(

And I hope {{mlw}} is available at all the projects as you say. Since I see now that you are right about it doing a better job.

So, since I don't like the extra links that {{tiw}} causes then I guess I should change all the links to using {{mlw}} to get the look I want.

This interwiki stuff is tricky.

--David Göthberg (talk) 09:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

{{main talk other}} now broken, please revert

Hi Patrik. I saw you stumbled on one of the more subtle details of {{main talk other}}. Empty versus not defined template parameters are not the same thing. So I left a message for you at Template talk:Main talk other. I knew I should have documented the details of that code more...

--David Göthberg (talk) 14:20, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another admin reverted your edit, so now the template works again. That was a subtle thing so I am not surprised you didn't see it. Its pretty counter intuitive that {{{variable|default}}} doesn't produce the default for empty but defined variables.

--David Göthberg (talk) 14:49, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know the difference between empty and undefined, but that an empty "demospace" is supposed to work like an undefined one was only implicitly suggested in the usage example section. I added that to the Basic functionality section.--Patrick (talk) 15:19, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I took a look, yeah good addition. Thanks for helping with ironing out the kinks in the documentation.

--David Göthberg (talk) 19:35, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Help desk

It seems like you have helped a user with something (see [1]). However that did NOT have to do with Wikipedia, the free encylcopedia. See WP:NOT for more info on this. Nothing 444 14:17, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strictly it belongs on mw:, but the answer is as short as a link to there.--Patrick (talk) 15:48, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

yea but still Nothing 444 19:55, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:Catsh

A tag has been placed on Template:Catsh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:20, 23 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of List of non-pornographic films featuring nudity

An editor has nominated List of non-pornographic films featuring nudity, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of non-pornographic films featuring nudity and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 21:59, 26 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Ft

Template:Ft has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — _pete 14:39, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Suppressing printing of placeholder images

Good day! I have a couple of questions.

I noticed that you wrote the Template:Image class and successfully added it to Template:Infobox actor and that placeholder images do not print on articles with Infobox actor. I presumed this was due to the class="metadata dummy" of image class but when I tried adding Image class to Template:Infobox Gridiron football person, it still shows on the print view. Did I do it incorrectly or was there something else done with Infobox actor to prevent placeholders printing?

This is also very pertinent to a discussion going on about placeholder images at Wikipedia:Centralized discussion/Image placeholders and I wonder if you could pipe in with your opinion and expertise on this matter particularly in Technical limitations of present system section but, of course, generally as well.

Thanks, DoubleBlue (Talk) 01:04, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I see you fixed my capitalisation error on Infobox Gridiron football person! Much appreciated. DoubleBlue (Talk) 02:47, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Contents

I revised Category:Contents to be based on Wikipedia:Namespace. Since you have the most contributions to Wikipedia:Namespace (see WP Page stats), would you please look at Category:Contents and approve/modify as needed. Thanks. GregManninLB (talk) 18:31, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Project

Myself and several other editors have been compiling a list of very active editors who would likely be available to help new editors in the event they have questions or concerns. As the list grew and the table became more detailed, it was determined that the best way to complete the table was to ask each potential candidate to fill in their own information, if they so desire. This list is sorted geographically in order to provide a better estimate as to whether the listed editor is likely to be active.

If you consider yourself a very active Wikipedian who is willing to help newcomers, please either complete your information in the table or add your entry. If you do not want to be on the list, either remove your name or just disregard this message and your entry will be removed within 48 hours. The table can be found at User:Useight/Highly Active, as it has yet to have been moved into the Wikipedia namespace. Thank you for your help. Useight (talk) 17:50, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Rdt

Template:Rtd has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Kubanczyk (talk) 18:50, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Apparently should be Wikipedia:Templates for deletion#Template:Rdt.--Patrick (talk) 21:07, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Elements of Dynamic Symmetry

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Elements of Dynamic Symmetry, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Dicklyon (talk) 04:41, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Clothing laws by country

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Clothing laws by country, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jeepday (talk) 21:03, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I removed the chart Diff, going to look to see if I can find a reference for anything in the text. Jeepday (talk) 22:21, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Found a couple references, and made a few changes per the references. Moving on to other article now. Jeepday (talk) 22:44, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Funny Games U.S.

Can you please show me where the consensus was to move this to the new title?--CyberGhostface (talk) 19:57, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you feel it should be moved to Funny Games U.S., then please list it at Wikipedia:Requested moves. And if you move a page, it's always good to fix any redirects that will be caused as a result. Thanks! Lugnuts (talk) 07:36, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion is at Talk:Funny_Games_(2008_film)#move_to_Funny_Games_U.S..--Patrick (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: UEFA Euro 2008

OK, fair enough, but I assume the "abbr" parameter in the table actually does something or it serves no purpose. Could we not find a less invasive way of displaying what the abbreviations stand for than a big ugly template? – Pee Jay 10:02, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wondered about that "abbr" too, it does not do anything, it seems. Linking the headers to an explanation is another possibility.--Patrick (talk) 10:06, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps. What we really need is a single appendix-style page that any football article can link to. It would negate the need for keys and legends in most articles. Another alternative would be making it so that the expanded term comes up as a tooltip when you roll over the abbreviation. – Pee Jay 10:22, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That is fine, but do not remove a legend before creating a proper replacement!--Patrick (talk) 20:34, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Happening

Was the film any good? I'm interested in seeing it, but not sure if it's worth seeing in theaters or waiting for the DVD release. —Erik (talk • contrib) - 22:45, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I liked the first part, after that it was more of the same.--Patrick (talk) 23:00, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding my help desk question

Oh hey, I'd completely forgotten to check on that — but your solution seems to have worked! Thanks much! $\sim$ Lenoxus " * " 19:56, 26 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Minor edits

Patrick --

Just in the future, when you are moving pages or chaning pages to redirects, I think it would be helpful if you did not mark those changes as "minor edits". It makes it difficult to effectively monitor a watchlist. Thanks |► ϋ r b a n я e n e w a l ◄| (talk) 16:08, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean? A move cannot be marked as minor. I just marked a change in a redirect to fix a double redirect as minor.--Patrick (talk) 23:24, 2 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

re. Converting file to HTML so it works for email

Patrick, thanks for addressing my question. Could you please explain how I convert the file on the address bar to HTML so I can copy/paste? Thanks. JohnClarknew (talk) 14:26, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Things depend on operating system, browser, and email program. I tried to explain in Wikipedia:Help_desk#Copy.2Fpaste_link_to_WP_article_to_email how it works for me. As I said, when I copy the rendered link itself (not the URL in the address bar), and use HTML-format in email program Outlook (a setting, not a conversion I have to do myself), the link works.--Patrick (talk) 14:41, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I don't have the background to take this all in, but on a hit or miss basis I have made it work, so thanks for taking the time to understand my question. JohnClarknew (talk) 16:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for fixing HMS2Deg

How did you find it? (The sound you hear is Saintrain (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2008 (UTC)'s head hitting desk repeatedly.)[reply]

I noticed the error from the example.--Patrick (talk) 21:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I mean the template in the 1st place? The VP post? Saintrain (talk) 22:43, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, Wikipedia:Village_pump_(technical)/Archive_45#Two odd(?) template behaviors.--Patrick (talk) 05:50, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Diminishing and increasing marginal utility

The only thing required for diminishing marginal utility is that

e_{n+1}\prec e_{n}

where $e_{i}$ is the best possible use of the $i$ unit of the good or service. The only thing required for increasing marginal utility is that

e_{n+1}\succ e_{n}

Neither of these imply any quantification of utility, and certainly none of the examples that you furnished imply quantification of utility. There is no good purpose in adding an assumption of quantification to the section of “Marginal utility” which discusses the “law” of diminishing marginal utility. The article discusses quantified utility in due course.

And please be aware that mainstream economics has made a terrible hash of things when it comes to labelling various conceptions as “ordinal” or as “cardinal”. Not only do most economists confuse various possible sorts of quantifications, but they don't even engage in the same confusions, so that one author will use “cardinal” for any case where only affine transforms are allowed (eg, for EU maximizers), and another will use it to mean cases where interpersonal arithmetic is allowed, and much wanking has been echoing through the literature for literally decades as a result. —SlamDiego_←T 02:35, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Negative number fix for template:nts

Please take a look at Template_talk:Sort#Negative_number_fix_for_template:nts. -- Tcncv (talk) 06:55, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

mediawiki

Please check your talk page on mediawiki for a question. --Gerry Ashton (talk) 20:08, 6 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cite news

Thank you for your help in editing this template. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 02:38, 10 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of RESTORE

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article RESTORE, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. ViperSnake151 23:52, 11 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kinetic energy talk

Patrick, could you please take this to this guy's talk page and keep it there? This really is not appropriate for an article's talk page. Other than that, we both know this will never end, right? Thanks, DVdm (talk) 21:21, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A short answer can better be put under the question.--Patrick (talk) 21:37, 19 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not if after two warnings the question shouldn't have been asked there in the first place. And again, other than that, in some cases no answer is far more effective. DVdm (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

BFJA Awards

could you please add BFJA Awards in incert list in Template:Infobox Actor.--Jayanta Nath (talk) 11:32, 24 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Seven of Daran

Hee, ik was net van plan om dat artikel aan te maken, tot mijn grote verbasing bestond het al :) Dit is wel een goed interview met Rolf Visser, de initiatiefnemer van de film: http://pauwenwitteman.vara.nl/Archief-detail.113.0.html?&tx_ttnews[tt_news]=1132&tx_ttnews[backPid]=111&cHash=eeddc67fc5. Groet, JACO PLANE • 2008-09-25 21:25

AfD nomination of Hatnote

I have nominated Hatnote, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hatnote. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — neuro^(talk) 23:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC) — neuro^(talk) 23:02, 8 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template

This Template:Infobox NS-station has a problem. It does not show correctly in articles. Can you fix that? --VanBurenen (talk) 11:35, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is fixed. --VanBurenen (talk) 13:07, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Agglo Utrecht.png

Image:Agglo Utrecht.png is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Agglo-utrecht.png. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Agglo-utrecht.png]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 12:51, 24 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsten Sheridan

Would you mind semi-protecting the BLP Kirsten Sheridan? An IP editor keeps adding negative gossip with a filmmaker online forum as the ref, despite being pointed to WP:RS. Thanks, Melty girl 21:29, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Summary field

RfD nomination of Horizontal dividing line

Image:Panoramix.png

This image was deleted a long time ago for lack of FUR. Could you undelete it, I will add a FUR, please ? Thanks. --Pah777 (talk) 14:20, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Patrick (talk) 23:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Patrick. Thanks for restauring the file, but I had forgotten to add your talk page to my watchlist, so that I did not see the restoration (and forgot the image). Can you restore it again, please, I will add a fur immediately.

I have another question: what is the template you use to welcome the new participants to the wikiprojects ? I wanted to use it for User:Tylerdmace but did not find it. --Pah777 (talk) 23:25, 13 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

request for third opinion

Hi, I and my fellow editors are facing a deadlock on a issue of removing/toning down a section on 'allegation of cruelty' as subsection under 'criticism' section in Operation Blue Star article, concerns include WP:NPOV, the summary of dispute can be found at [2], please let us know your views/opinion at the talk page of the article so that 'alleged' bias may be looked into and a consensual solution may be found. Thanks LegalEagle (talk) 07:37, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Template help

Can you help me with the template Template:National Public Radio. I want to add a second parameter for year, so it would be "National Public Radio|21546|2004" and it would read out say "Joe Smith on National Public Radio in 2004". I need it for people who have been interviewed more than once. --Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ) (talk) 21:09, 9 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Young People Fucking

Hi Patrick, just thought I'd give you a quick tip: Here you wrote "fucking"; generally, we try to avoid adverbs on Wikipedia, additionally, the word conflicts with our neutral tone policy. Just thought I'd bring this to your attention! Thanks! Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 21:50, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I meant it as a neutral term. If you prefer a different wording, note that your "consents to anal sex" is ambiguous (who penetrates who?).--Patrick (talk) 22:36, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uh... even if you had the best intentions with "fucking", it's really not encyclopaedic. Also, "fucking" means sexual intercourse without passion or love; they're a married couple. I shall change it again to make it less ambiguous. Thank you. Scarian ^{Call me Pat!} 23:04, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No content in Category:Images with 2D dihedral symmetry

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Category:Images with 2D dihedral symmetry, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Category:Images with 2D dihedral symmetry has been empty for at least four days, and its only content has been links to parent categories. (CSD C1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Category:Images with 2D dihedral symmetry, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:40, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Expectation

This edit is unfortunate and I'm surprised that it persisted so long. Just go to expectation and click on "what links here" and you see that a very large number of the links should point to expected value, the mathematical concept. Furthermore, with a very small bit of common sense, one would EXPECT that. Accordingly I've moved the page to expectation (epistemic) and changed expectation to a disambiguation page. Michael Hardy (talk) 18:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

100px		Hello, fellow reading fan
		Thanks for being one of the major contributors at ≈ The Boy in the Striped Pyjamas ---Go reading!!!---

--CFountain (talk) 21:25, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template substitution

How do I create a conditional new line in wikitext when substituting a template? I'm trying to add a newline when e.g. parameter "align" is present.

Sample

1. Sample template : "Template:testnewline" ([3])

ABC{{<includeonly>subst:</includeonly>#ifeq:{{{align|}}}|{{{align}}}|
 align = {{{align}}}|}}
DEF

2. When called empty ({{subst:testnewline}}), it should just create

ABC
DEF

3. When called as {{subst:testnewline|align=left}}, it should create

ABC
 align = left 
DEF

but it generates [4]:

ABCalign = left 
DEF

The newline keeps getting stripped as per Meta:Help:Newlines and spaces. I couldn't figure out the workarounds described there, e.g. with Template:For loop. I was wondering if you would help me with this. It would help me improve a template like [5] -- User:Docu

Put ABC (or some last part of it) inside the ifeq [6].--Patrick (talk) 22:13, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, that works. As I like to add several conditional lines, I suppose I just need to put one inside the other. -- User:Docu

That does not work if the conditions are independent. In that case another method is needed, like that of Template:Conditional template call with newline (applying it or doing it in a similar way).--Patrick (talk) 23:59, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I tried to work it out by calling {{!}} with [7], but still ended up with [8]. BTW I added the optional fields to the documentation at 1 while looking at 2. -- User:Docu

I added substctc=subst:[9], it seems fixed now. I clarified the purpose of p1n and p1v.[10]--Patrick (talk) 08:51, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. It works. I added it as a sample to the documentation. -- User:Docu

Infoboxes

Hi there, I notice you've contributed to quite a few technically bits of Wikipedia, so I was hoping you could help me. I'm currently practicing making an infobox on my userpage. I looked on the page Template:Infobox and found some examples to work on and have also been looking at other infobox templates as a guide too. The problem I am having is how to use optional headers. So, here's my scenario:

I have an infobox about a professional dancer, outlining their personal details, training school and what company they dance with. As dancers are promoted within the company, this influences the roles they play, so I would like to include the date when the dancer was promoted at each rank. However, if no information is provided about when the dancer was promoted, I don't want that section of the infobox to be seen.

This is what I have at the moment:

|header1 = Dates Promoted
|label2 = Principal
|data2 = {{{Promoted_Principal}}}
|label3 = Senior Soloist
|data3 = {{{{Promoted_Snr_Soloist}}}
|label4 = Soloist
|data4 = {{{Promoted_Soloist}}}
|label5 = Senior Corps
|data5 = {{{Promoted_Snr_Corps}}}

Now I just need to know how to hide all of that if no data is given for any of those fields (Principal - Senior Corps).

I hope I'm making sense, I'm trying to learn this by the bucket science method of "I don't know what I'm doing, but if I keep trying it different ways, I'm sure to get the result I'm after". Thank You!!! Crazy-dancing (talk) 15:16, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Template:Infobox#Making_fields_optional.--Patrick (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and I would love to know how you d those collapsible bits as well. So for example if you look at the version my userpage, I have included a list of previous companies. How would I make that into a collapsible list? Crazy-dancing (talk) 15:25, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See Help:Collapsing.--Patrick (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much, I will go and read these immediately, your help is much appreciated. Crazy-dancing (talk) 15:03, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New Pages

A tag has been placed on New Pages, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect to a user page from the main/article space.

If you can fix the redirect to point to a regular Wikipedia article rather than a user page, please do so and remove the speedy deletion tag. However, please do not remove the speedy deletion tag unless you are fixing the redirect. If you think the redirect should be retained as is for some reason, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your reasoning on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- IRP ☎ 00:17, 14 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of J. C. Penney (disambiguation)

I have nominated J. C. Penney (disambiguation), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/J. C. Penney (disambiguation). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP)} 19:15, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Soest

Can you change that to Soest instead of Soest in all applicable templates? A disambiguation page is not very usefull. Peter Horn 00:55, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about the triplicate, something, I don't know what, went haywire. Peter Horn 00:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links are specified in Template:Link Dutch municipality (done).--Patrick (talk) 08:34, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Then why do the following still appear in Pages that link to "Soest" ?

I'm puzzled. Peter Horn 15:47, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Those can be removed with a null edit (done).--Patrick (talk) 16:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I still have to learn a trick or two. Peter Horn 14:44, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kamiel Maase & Talk:Kamiel Maase#Which Soest The cross country race was in which Soest, Soest, Netherlands or Soest, Germany? I'm inclined to think it is the first of the two. Peter Horn 15:43, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NNDB

I see that you have a link to NNDB on something you call a "ref tab" on your user page. Please be aware that NNDB has been ruled as explicitly failing to be a reliable source in multiple discussions on this site. Please do not use it as a reference for any article, as someone would just have to clean up after it later. DreamGuy (talk) 21:58, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorting help

Thanks for your help at list of coal mines in the United States - couldn't figure it out and it was driving me crazy! Bantman (talk) 22:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I need help

Hello Patrick, I left you a message here about a problem I have in that wiki, I hope you can help me with that. - Damërung ^{...ÏìíÏ...}_{__Ξ_} . -- 09:46, 2 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Definition of 'Kowloon peninsula'

I am seeking to change our definition of 'Kowloon peninsula'. See that talk page.
Earthlyreason (talk) 06:36, 12 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template

A template you created, Template:Nmile, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. R'n'B (call me Russ) 09:42, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox actor

Hi. I was wondering if you could explain this change and how that works. Is it an automatic suppression or something we must do? Thanks. Wildhartlivie (talk) 21:39, 4 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please see Template:Image class names.--Patrick (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:2x

Template:2x has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Locos epraix ~ Beastepraix 16:40, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:Fs

Template:Fs has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:11, 9 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to HTC Dream, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources, please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. UltraMagnus (talk) 08:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

table optimization

Dear Patrick; I made a long wikibreak. Hope that you are fine. I need your help in table optimization at the pages listed at special:PrefixIndex/user:Gangleri/tests/sandbox/squares/rakonto. These pages are part of a new game developed together at commons:category:Collaborative work. Please take a look at the related talk page. You might be interested on some card tricks. Just look at Medias (examples). My friend and me made the videos in a rush. Please enjoy. Best regards
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 12:06, 6 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I moved the page to commons:Commons:Story (game) - collaborative work. Best regards

‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 02:54, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Seating

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Seating. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Seating. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Tfdendsp

Template:Tfdendsp has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 13:34, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cycling in the Netherlands

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Cycling in the Netherlands, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --unforgettableid | talk 18:32, 9 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Voyager 1

Hi! Are there sources for the interesting statements about Voyager 1 you added recently? Thanks! --Cyclopia ^talk 13:14, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I changed now 15 to 19 m/s per year, found by comparing velocities on two dates from http://voyager.jpl.nasa.gov/mission/weekly-reports/index.htm; 1000 km/s is from Escape_velocity#List_of_escape_velocities; 4 km/s is from the escape velocity formula; specific energy and terminal velocity are from the formula of kinetic energy.--Patrick (talk) 22:31, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ehm, this is brilliant, but unfortunately I'd say this violates WP:OR. --Cyclopia ^talk 22:33, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would say simple arithmetic is not OR, it just provides some clarification.--Patrick (talk) 22:37, 12 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Biezelinge

Greetings! I restored this article that you started in 2005 and expanded it with information from the Dutch Wikipedia. If you have any other knowledge on the subject that you'd like to impart, please have at it. Cheers! bd2412 T 22:48, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Map of cities served by the Dutch railways night service

Template:Map of cities served by the Dutch railways night service has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 21:05, 1 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Resistance is futile

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Resistance is futile. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Resistance is futile (2 nomination). Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:08, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Patrick! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 5 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

Melody Klaver - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:42, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]