User talk:PatGallacher/Archive 13
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:PatGallacher. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | Archive 11 | Archive 12 | Archive 13 | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 |
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, PatGallacher
Thank you for creating Thuringbert of Wormgau.
User:Rosguill, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
It seems to me like it should be "of Wormsgau". What's your opinion?
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
signed, Rosguill talk 18:15, 27 March 2020 (UTC)
The article Artur Sandauer has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 02:55, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Artur Sandauer
Hello PatGallacher,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Artur Sandauer for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!
Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 13:39, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
- Tag removed, sorry about that. Regards Hughesdarren (talk) 13:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Robert Cawdron
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Robert Cawdron".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Train of Knowledge (Talk) 03:54, 10 April 2020 (UTC)
The article Jennifer Croxton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable actor
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:32, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- I’ve noticed you’ve deprodded the article - Have you managed to locate any independent secondary sources that would indicate notability? Currently the only external link is IMDb which is not a WP:RS. If not I will take to AfD. Thanks. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Jennifer Croxton for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jennifer Croxton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jennifer Croxton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Cardiffbear88 (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
Gerald Joseph Cuthbert Harrison moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Gerald Joseph Cuthbert Harrison, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 22:50, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
Robert Waddington (politician) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Robert Waddington (politician), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Amkgp ✉ 00:50, 18 May 2020 (UTC)
William George Waterhouse Reynolds moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, William George Waterhouse Reynolds, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 00:00, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Owen Parker moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Owen Parker, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 03:57, 20 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert Waddington (politician) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Zanimum (talk) 04:19, 20 May 2020 (UTC)Howard Button moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Howard Button, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Celestina007 (talk) 17:09, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
I suggest giving people a few minutes to add sources. PatGallacher (talk) 17:13, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
1922 MPs
Hello PatGallacher! I appreciate you adding articles for members of the short Parliamentary session of 1922. I have seen your work in the Draft article space and I think these are well on their way to being accepted. I'm a little apprehensive about accepting the articles myself, because they seem a little short on content, even for a stub. I challenge you to find a little more information about these subjects to pad out the articles and their sources a little more (which shouldn't be impossible if they existed in the 20th Century). Once that is all done, I would be happy to accept those drafts! Thanks for all your help at expanding Wikipedia! Bkissin (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- May I add to this and suggest you hold off creating these articles unless you have the material to create "mini biographies". I draw your atention to the biographies I created out of thin air recently: Albert Lindsay Parkinson and Bouverie McDonald, all out of Google-able sources, more substantive than these recent additions.Marplesmustgo (talk) 23:48, 24 May 2020 (UTC)
Alfred Hillier moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Alfred Hillier, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ~Amkgp ✉ 03:53, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
William Gastrell moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, William Gastrell, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page.
The page is a good start, but needs more inline citations and, preferably, more reliable sources before it is ready to be published. This is a good start however, and I hope you will develop the article so that it may be moved back to the public in the futureNightenbelle (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
William Weir Gilmour
Hello Pat. I’m not sure if this is the correct way to message you. I’ve not used this before. I removed content from the page because is my father and my then 17 year old was researching her ancestry. I didn’t want her learning about this online. Mel1425 (talk) 00:55, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Thank you for your reply. I recognise this could raise some complex and sensitive issues. However Wikipedia is not censored for the protection of minors, see WP:NOTCENSORED. Some might ask if the issue you mention was more deplorable than his fascist activities. Wikipedia has biographies on a lot of people with controversial personal lives e.g. Tommy Sheridan currently has a teenage daughter, her parents might not feel happy about some issues online, and Chelsea Clinton was in her teens when her father's activities hit the headlines. However I will raise this on the appropriate Wikipedia noticeboard if you want. PatGallacher (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
I didn’t think anyone would care about it being removed and didn’t know I had to give a reason. I’m not knowledgeable about Wikipedia procedures. Neither Tommy Sheridan nor Clinton have been convicted of sexually abusing their juvenile daughters. In addition, W W Gilmour has been dead for over 20 years and he has no influence in politics today. I would have been happy for the politicians and religious leaders who knew him to have spoken out about at the time. It upsets me that they kept quiet, possibly because they were also involved in some of his “activities”, yet now it is published on a public forum. That particular information benefits no-one. Thank you. Mel1425 (talk) 18:28, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Howard Button has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Goldsztajn (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Alfred Hillier has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Goldsztajn (talk) 19:00, 30 May 2020 (UTC)I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hello, PatGallacher
Thank you for creating Charlotte Corday (1908 film).
User:Boleyn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
You have been repeatedly asked not to create articles with no or poor referencing, many times over many years. IMDB is not an accepted ref on WP.
To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Boleyn (talk) 20:50, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
Charlotte Corday (1908 film) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Charlotte Corday (1908 film), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 20:51, 2 June 2020 (UTC)
- Well, I created this article because it already existed on the French wikipedia and their equivalent of Charlotte Corday (disambiguation), but I will look into improving it. PatGallacher (talk) 00:13, 3 June 2020 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: William Gastrell has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Bkissin (talk) 14:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Corday (1908 film) (June 5)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charlotte Corday (1908 film) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Charlotte Corday (1908 film), click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello, PatGallacher!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:21, 5 June 2020 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: William George Waterhouse Reynolds has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
Eddie891 Talk Work 13:12, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Ways to improve Ernest Alexander (politician)
Hello, PatGallacher,
Thank you for creating Ernest Alexander (politician).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This has been tagged for referencing issues.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 07:09, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
"Deposed monarchy cruft" (I call it "crowncruft")
Is it about time for us to do a RfC about what I call "crowncruft"? There are editors out there who seem to feel that the great-grandson of some Italian duke deposed in 1935 should still qualify as notable just because they can put "Duke of Fortessa-Cappucino" on their business cards at the vacuum-cleaner dealership where they work. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Possibly, although we seem to be making a reasonable job of eliminating them on a case-by-case basis. PatGallacher (talk) 16:41, 31 July 2020 (UTC)
Manuel Uribarri moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Manuel Uribarri, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Kadzi (talk) 10:03, 9 August 2020 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Manuel Uribarri has a new comment
Deletion of Prince Daniel of Saxony
Hello PatGallacher, I am attempting to address your proposed deletion due to "Deposed monarchy cruft". I have added some explanations and references to the article. Is this sufficient to allay deletion? If not, could you please suggest what more would be needed?--Dr.bobbs (talk) 12:57, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
IMHO no, I'm afraid. It's not a question of references or more detail, it's a question of whether he is notable, see WP:GNG. If you want you could contest the prod, but then this would probably end up going to AFD. PatGallacher (talk) 16:33, 29 August 2020 (UTC)
Check your Autism
Really, why are you so obsessively bothered by the existence of royal and noble biographical pages? Your crusade to delete theme achieves absolutely nothing. Your obsessions are own business, and you shouldn't project them onto Wikipedia, which groans under the weight of earnest but useless contributors like you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.19.173.184 (talk) 10:35, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
There is a degree of monarchist bias about many of these articles, and also anti-German and anti-Italian bias about some of them, not recognising the unification of these countries in the mid-19th-century, there is also original research in some of the supposed lines of succession. See WP:BIAS. PatGallacher (talk) 14:13, 1 September 2020 (UTC)
Roger McKenzie (trade unionist) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Roger McKenzie (trade unionist), does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Aaqib Anjum Aafī (talk) 18:45, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Out of curiosity, why are you questioning her notability? - dwc lr (talk) 08:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
Being the wife of a notable pretender does not make you notable, see WP:NOTINHERITED. PatGallacher (talk) 16:36, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- Yeah but have you looked up what coverage is out there of her in reliable sources, or are you just making generalisations? You might as well start going around tagging as being of questionable notability any random footballer, actor, opera singer, scientist, politician etc that you’ve never heard of as they do not automatically confer notability. I can’t see the basis of your notability test. Nobody is automatically notable. - dwc lr (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
- I came to inquire about the exact same thing. Did you even look her up before nominating or did you just assume because she was a pretender's consort she was not notable? I sense an anti-monarchist bias to this nomination, no WP:NPOV. --Richiepip (talk) 01:26, 8 September 2020 (UTC)
Francisco de Eguía moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Francisco de Eguía, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. John B123 (talk) 09:37, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 2
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 633 Squadron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Glencoe.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:43, 2 October 2020 (UTC)
Royal notability
Greetings...you have a very good understanding of Wiki policies and have also voted and put up for deletion many Royalty related articles. I would appreciate if you could provide your opinion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Tripura Sundari Ammani. Regards, Sunshine1191 (talk) 01:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)
Why did you not issue a similar warning to Rhino131 for supposedly being "unconstructive" and "edit-warring". Seems very biased and one-sided of you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.11.64.214 (talk) 20:31, 10 October 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 19
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roza Salih, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The National.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
The article Category:Deaths in Connecticut has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Hello PatGallacher. I'm nominating the category you created, Deaths in Connecticut, because I feel its redundant to its parent category Category:Death in Connecticut
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joeyvandernaald (talk) 14:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths in Hawaii
A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths in Hawaii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:54, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
Query
The Question asked “which son of Noah was ancestor of Jesus Christ?” & your post indicated Ham, by going to that page, but it was Shem. Please correct this if possible. It may be an error of the search feature. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.58.197.14 (talk) 01:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, not sure what you are on about. PatGallacher (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Category:Deaths in Connecticut has been nominated for discussion
Category:Deaths in Connecticut has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Joeyvandernaald (talk) 15:11, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
 | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Battle of Thermopylae (191 BC)
I rewrote the article from scratch, I know what I am doing. Look for the context of the edit before undoing it.--Catlemur (talk) 08:56, 3 December 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Charlotte Corday (1908 film)
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Charlotte Corday".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 21:51, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 11
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sanquhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Free Church of Scotland.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:12, 11 December 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of William Crichton, 2nd Earl of Dumfries for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/William Crichton, 2nd Earl of Dumfries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Train of Knowledge (Talk) 00:26, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Deaths by stabbing in Hawaii
A tag has been placed on Category:Deaths by stabbing in Hawaii requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 16:56, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:The Rocking Horse Winner (1977 film)
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Rocking Horse Winner".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 03:18, 28 January 2021 (UTC)
Zara Mohammed moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Zara Mohammed, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Loksmythe (talk) 19:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Manuel Uribarri
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Manuel Uribarri".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 16:28, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Manuel Uribarri has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
CommanderWaterford (talk) 13:19, 11 February 2021 (UTC)Ways to improve Paddy Christie (journalist)
Hello, PatGallacher,
Thank you for creating Paddy Christie (journalist).
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
This has been tagged for two issues.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Boleyn}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Boleyn (talk) 12:28, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Francisco de Eguía
Hello, PatGallacher. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Francisco de Eguía".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:14, 15 March 2021 (UTC)